Neutralizing Self-Selection Bias in Sampling for Sortition

被引:0
|
作者
Flanigan, Bailey [1 ]
Golz, Paul [1 ]
Gupta, Anupam [1 ]
Procaccia, Ariel D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Comp Sci Dept, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Cambridge, MA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Sortition is a political system in which decisions are made by panels of randomly selected citizens. The process for selecting a sortition panel is traditionally thought of as uniform sampling without replacement, which has strong fairness properties. In practice, however, sampling without replacement is not possible since only a fraction of agents is willing to participate in a panel when invited, and different demographic groups participate at different rates. In order to still produce panels whose composition resembles that of the population, we develop a sampling algorithm that restores close-to-equal representation probabilities for all agents while satisfying meaningful demographic quotas. As part of its input, our algorithm requires probabilities indicating how likely each volunteer in the pool was to participate. Since these participation probabilities are not directly observable, we show how to learn them, and demonstrate our approach using data on a real sortition panel combined with information on the general population in the form of publicly available survey data.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Volunteerism and self-selection bias in human positron emission tomography neuroimaging research
    Lynn M. Oswald
    Gary S. Wand
    Shijun Zhu
    Victoria Selby
    [J]. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 2013, 7 : 163 - 176
  • [42] Do schizophrenic subjects who consent to imaging show a self-selection bias?
    Armenakis, AD
    Anzalone, S
    Poole, JH
    Deicken, R
    Vinogradov, S
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 51 (08) : 110S - 111S
  • [43] Self-Selection Bias: An Essential Design Consideration for Nutrition Trials in Healthy Populations
    Young, Lauren M.
    Gauci, Sarah
    Scholey, Andrew
    White, David J.
    Pipingas, Andrew
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2020, 7
  • [44] BIAS IN ESTIMATES OF DISCRIMINATION AND DEFAULT IN MORTGAGE LENDING - THE EFFECTS OF SIMULTANEITY AND SELF-SELECTION
    YEZER, AMJ
    PHILLIPS, RF
    TROST, RP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REAL ESTATE FINANCE AND ECONOMICS, 1994, 9 (03): : 197 - 215
  • [45] THE TRIPLE OPTION CHOICE - SELF-SELECTION BIAS IN TRADITIONAL COVERAGE, HMOS, AND PPOS
    STRUMWASSER, I
    PARANJPE, NV
    RONIS, DL
    MCGINNIS, J
    KEE, DW
    HALL, HL
    [J]. INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 1989, 26 (04) : 432 - 441
  • [46] What Makes a Good Fisherman? Linear Regression under Self-Selection Bias
    Cherapanamjeri, Yeshwanth
    Daskalakis, Constantinos
    Ilyas, Andrew
    Zampetakis, Manolis
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 55TH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY OF COMPUTING, STOC 2023, 2023, : 1699 - 1712
  • [47] Victim-Offender Mediation and Reduced Reoffending: Gauging the Self-Selection Bias
    Jonas-van Dijk, Jiska
    Zebel, Sven
    Claessen, Jacques
    Nelen, Hans
    [J]. CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 2020, 66 (6-7) : 949 - 972
  • [48] Self-Selection of Peers and Performance
    Kiessling, Lukas
    Radbruch, Jonas
    Schaube, Sebastian
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2022, 68 (11) : 8184 - 8201
  • [49] SCHOOLING, SELF-SELECTION, AND HEALTH
    BERGER, MC
    LEIGH, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 1989, 24 (03) : 433 - 455
  • [50] WHY NOT TRY SELF-SELECTION
    THOMPSON, ME
    [J]. ELEMENTARY ENGLISH, 1956, 33 (08): : 486 - 490