Neutralizing Self-Selection Bias in Sampling for Sortition

被引:0
|
作者
Flanigan, Bailey [1 ]
Golz, Paul [1 ]
Gupta, Anupam [1 ]
Procaccia, Ariel D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Comp Sci Dept, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Cambridge, MA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Sortition is a political system in which decisions are made by panels of randomly selected citizens. The process for selecting a sortition panel is traditionally thought of as uniform sampling without replacement, which has strong fairness properties. In practice, however, sampling without replacement is not possible since only a fraction of agents is willing to participate in a panel when invited, and different demographic groups participate at different rates. In order to still produce panels whose composition resembles that of the population, we develop a sampling algorithm that restores close-to-equal representation probabilities for all agents while satisfying meaningful demographic quotas. As part of its input, our algorithm requires probabilities indicating how likely each volunteer in the pool was to participate. Since these participation probabilities are not directly observable, we show how to learn them, and demonstrate our approach using data on a real sortition panel combined with information on the general population in the form of publicly available survey data.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Self-selection bias in hypothesis comparison
    Whitman, Jennifer C.
    Woodward, Todd S.
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2012, 118 (02) : 216 - 225
  • [2] Confidence, Self-Selection, and Bias in the Aggregates
    Enke, Benjamin
    Graeber, Thomas
    Oprea, Ryan
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2023, 113 (07): : 1933 - 1966
  • [3] Self-selection bias in reputation systems
    Kramer, Mark A.
    [J]. Trust Management, 2007, 238 : 255 - 268
  • [4] Reducing Self-Selection Bias in Feeder Cattle Premium Estimates Using Matched Sampling
    Williams, Brian R.
    DeVuyst, Eric A.
    Peel, Derrell S.
    Raper, Kellie Curry
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2014, 39 (01) : 124 - 138
  • [5] Reviews and Self-Selection Bias with Operational Implications
    Chen, Ningyuan
    Li, Anran
    Talluri, Kalyan
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2021, 67 (12) : 7472 - 7492
  • [6] Self-selection bias in business ethics research
    James, Harvey S., Jr.
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2006, 16 (04) : 559 - 577
  • [7] Selection bias in semen studies due to self-selection of volunteers
    Muller, A
    De La Rochebrochard, E
    Labbé-Declèves, C
    Jouannet, P
    Bujan, L
    Mieusset, R
    Le Lannou, D
    Guerin, JF
    Benchaib, M
    Slama, R
    Spira, A
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 19 (12) : 2838 - 2844
  • [8] Fathers' participation in family research: Is there a self-selection bias?
    Costigan, CL
    Cox, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 15 (04) : 706 - 720
  • [9] The effectiveness of online reviews in the presence of self-selection bias
    Bhole, Bharat
    Hanna, Brid
    [J]. SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2017, 77 : 108 - 123
  • [10] CONSERVATION PROGRAM EVALUATIONS - THE CONTROL OF SELF-SELECTION BIAS
    NEWCOMB, TM
    [J]. EVALUATION REVIEW, 1984, 8 (03) : 425 - 440