Impacts of spatial heterogeneity of anthropogenic aerosol emissions in a regionally refined global aerosol-climate model

被引:0
|
作者
Hassan, Taufiq [1 ]
Zhang, Kai [1 ]
Li, Jianfeng [1 ]
Singh, Balwinder [1 ]
Zhang, Shixuan [1 ]
Wang, Hailong [1 ]
Ma, Po-Lun [1 ]
机构
[1] Atmospher Sci & Global Change Div, Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
关键词
NATIONAL CENTER; TECHNICAL NOTE; VERSION; ATMOSPHERE; SENSITIVITY; REPRESENTATION; INVENTORY; CHEMISTRY; GASES; CYCLE;
D O I
10.5194/gmd-17-3507-2024
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Emissions of anthropogenic aerosol and their precursors are often prescribed in global aerosol models. Most of these emissions are spatially heterogeneous at model grid scales. When remapped from low-resolution data, the spatial heterogeneity in emissions can be lost, leading to large errors in the simulation. It can also cause the conservation problem if non-conservative remapping is used. The default anthropogenic emission treatment in the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) is subject to both problems. In this study, we introduce a revised emission treatment for the E3SM Atmosphere Model (EAM) that ensures conservation of mass fluxes and preserves the original emission heterogeneity at the model-resolved grid scale. We assess the error estimates associated with the default emission treatment and the impact of improved heterogeneity and mass conservation in both globally uniform standard-resolution ( similar to 165 km) and regionally refined high-resolution ( similar to 42 km) simulations. The default treatment incurs significant errors near the surface, particularly over sharp emission gradient zones. Much larger errors are observed in high-resolution simulations. It substantially underestimates the aerosol burden, surface concentration, and aerosol sources over highly polluted regions, while it overestimates these quantities over less-polluted adjacent areas. Large errors can persist at higher elevation for daily mean estimates, which can affect aerosol extinction profiles and aerosol optical depth (AOD). We find that the revised treatment significantly improves the accuracy of the aerosol emissions from surface and elevated sources near sharp spatial gradient regions, with significant improvement in the spatial heterogeneity and variability of simulated surface concentration in high-resolution simulations. In the next-generation E3SM running at convection-permitting scales where the resolved spatial heterogeneity is significantly increased, the revised emission treatment is expected to better represent the aerosol emissions as well as their lifecycle and impacts on climate.
引用
收藏
页码:3507 / 3532
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Natural aerosol-climate feedbacks suppressed by anthropogenic aerosol
    Spracklen, D. V.
    Rap, A.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 40 (19) : 5316 - 5319
  • [2] Climate Impacts From a Removal of Anthropogenic Aerosol Emissions
    Samset, B. H.
    Sand, M.
    Smith, C. J.
    Bauer, S. E.
    Forster, P. M.
    Fuglestvedt, J. S.
    Osprey, S.
    Schleussner, C. -F.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 45 (02) : 1020 - 1029
  • [3] Aerosol indirect effects from shipping emissions: sensitivity studies with the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM
    Peters, K.
    Stier, P.
    Quaas, J.
    Grassl, H.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2012, 12 (13) : 5985 - 6007
  • [4] Implementing microscopic charcoal particles into a global aerosol-climate model
    Gilgen, Anina
    Adolf, Carole
    Brugger, Sandra O.
    Ickes, Luisa
    Schwikowski, Margit
    van Leeuwen, Jacqueline F. N.
    Tinner, Willy
    Lohmann, Ulrike
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2018, 18 (16) : 11813 - 11829
  • [5] Aerosol activation and cloud processing in the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM
    Roelofs, G. J.
    Stier, P.
    Feichter, J.
    Vignati, E.
    Wilson, J.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2006, 6 : 2389 - 2399
  • [6] BVOC-aerosol-climate interactions in the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM5.5-HAM2
    Makkonen, R.
    Asmi, A.
    Kerminen, V. -M.
    Boy, M.
    Arneth, A.
    Guenther, A.
    Kulmala, M.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2012, 12 (21) : 10077 - 10096
  • [7] Simulating the Effects of Anthropogenic Aerosols on Terrestrial Aridity Using an Aerosol-Climate Coupled Model
    Zhao, Shuyun
    Zhang, Hua
    Wang, Zhili
    Jing, Xianwen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2017, 30 (18) : 7451 - 7463
  • [8] The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3-Part 1: Aerosol evaluation
    Tegen, Ina
    Neubauer, David
    Ferrachat, Sylvaine
    Siegenthaler-Le Drian, Colombe
    Bey, Isabelle
    Schutgens, Nick
    Stier, Philip
    Watson-Parris, Duncan
    Stanelle, Tanja
    Schmidt, Hauke
    Rast, Sebastian
    Kokkola, Harri
    Schultz, Martin
    Schroeder, Sabine
    Daskalakis, Nikos
    Barthel, Stefan
    Heinold, Bernd
    Lohmann, Ulrike
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 12 (04) : 1643 - 1677
  • [9] Anthropogenic aerosol forcing - insights from multiple estimates from aerosol-climate models with reduced complexity
    Fiedler, Stephanie
    Kinne, Stefan
    Huang, Wan Ting Katty
    Raisanen, Petri
    O'Donnell, Declan
    Bellouin, Nicolas
    Stier, Philip
    Merikanto, Joonas
    van Noije, Twan
    Makkonen, Risto
    Lohmann, Ulrike
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2019, 19 (10) : 6821 - 6841
  • [10] The regional aerosol-climate model REMO-HAM
    Pietikainen, J. -P.
    O'Donnell, D.
    Teichmann, C.
    Karstens, U.
    Pfeifer, S.
    Kazil, J.
    Podzun, R.
    Fiedler, S.
    Kokkola, H.
    Birmili, W.
    O'Dowd, C.
    Baltensperger, U.
    Weingartner, E.
    Gehrig, R.
    Spindler, G.
    Kulmala, M.
    Feichter, J.
    Jacob, D.
    Laaksonen, A.
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 5 (06) : 1323 - 1339