Application of hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach to analyze wastewater microalgae culture systems for bioenergy production

被引:4
|
作者
Liu, Weixing [1 ]
Liu, Aozhan [2 ]
Qin, Huan [3 ,4 ]
Yan, Yixin [2 ]
Fu, Dafang [2 ]
Singh, Rajendra Prasad [2 ]
机构
[1] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Suzhou 215009, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Nanjing 211189, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Visual Neurosci & Stem Cell Engn, Wuhan 430065, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Life Sci & Hlth, Wuhan 430065, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Microalgal biomass; Multi -criteria decision analysis; Entropy weight method; TOPSIS method; CRITIC method; Bioenergy production; STRAINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envres.2024.119234
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Bioenergy generation from microalgae can significantly contribute to climate mitigation and renewable energy production. In this regard, several multi-criteria decision-making method were employed to prioritize appropriate microalgae culture system for bioenergy production. Entropy weight, Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) were the employed MCDA method. Fourteen microalgae culture systems were selected as a case study, which contain teen monoculture and four dual-culture. Initially, through ans in-depth review of the literature and expert views, four categories total eight indicators were selected as the evaluation indices of the study, namely 1) Proliferation: Half growth cycle and Max growth rate,2) Biomass output: Bio-crude yield and Lipid yield, 3) Nutrient utilization: residual concentration of total Nitrogen and total Phosphorus, and, 4) Stability: coefficient of variation of Bio-crude yield and Lipid yield. The result indicated that "Pediastrum sp. & Micractinium sp." was identified as the most bioenergy potential microalgae culture system, and the evaluation results of entropy weight method and CRITIC method are similar. It is pertinent to note that 1)the entropy weight method exhibits lower sample size requirements, 2) the critic method excels when dealing with larger sample sizes, and 3) the TOPSIS method necessitates the incorporation of appropriate weighting methods to ensure credible results. In the application stage, the key indicators related to cost can be further included in the evaluation indices.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Integrated process capability and multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Dagsuyu, Cansu
    Polat, Ulviye
    Kokangul, Ali
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (10) : 7169 - 7180
  • [42] Hospital performance management: A multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Tyagi, Aman
    Singh, Preetvanti
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 12 (04) : 286 - 291
  • [43] A multi-criteria decision-making approach for schizophrenia treatment techniques
    Ozsahin, Ilker
    Abebe, Samuel Tadesse
    Mok, Greta S. P.
    ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2020, 22 (02): : 52 - 61
  • [44] A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH FOR GREENOVATIVE SUPPLIER SELECTION
    Buyukselcuk, Elif Caloglu
    Tozan, Hakan
    Vayvay, Ozalp
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2022, 29 (02): : 283 - 301
  • [45] APPLICATION OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH FOR SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF CHOSEN PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULES
    Krysiak, Magdalena
    Kluczek, Aldona
    MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2020, 11 (03) : 106 - 118
  • [46] Charging strategy selection for electric bus systems: A multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Sadrani, Mohammad
    Najafi, Amirhossein
    Mirqasemi, Razieh
    Antoniou, Constantinos
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 347
  • [48] MODELLING APPROACH FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING SELECTION PROCESS FOR ARTIFICIAL LIFT SYSTEMS IN CRUDE OIL PRODUCTION
    Rodriguez, Oriolson
    Duran-Serrano, Javier
    Garcia-Chinchilla, Cesar
    Castillo, Edgar F.
    CT&F-CIENCIA TECNOLOGIA Y FUTURO, 2018, 8 (01): : 53 - 60
  • [49] A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for firms competence evaluation
    Amiri, M.
    Zandieh, M.
    Soltani, R.
    Vahdani, B.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (10) : 12314 - 12322
  • [50] A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for optimal coal blending
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    Mitra, Ankan
    JOURNAL OF MODELLING IN MANAGEMENT, 2019, 14 (02) : 339 - 359