Benefit-Cost Analysis of Increased Funding for Agricultural Research and Development in the Global South

被引:4
|
作者
Rosegrant, Mark W. [1 ]
Wong, Brad [2 ,3 ]
Sulser, Timothy B. [1 ]
Dubosse, Nancy [2 ]
Lybbert, Travis J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Int Food Policy Res Inst, Washington, DC USA
[2] Copenhagen Consensus Ctr, Tewksbury, MA 01876 USA
[3] Mettalytics, South Golden Beach, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Agr & Resource Econ, Davis, CA USA
关键词
agricultural innovation; agricultural R&D; benefit-cost analysis; eliminate hunger; IMPACT model; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; GREEN-REVOLUTION; RETURNS; AFRICA; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1017/bca.2023.27
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper conducts a benefit-cost analysis of expanding agricultural research and development (R&D) in the Global South. We extend a recent modeling exercise that used IFPRI's IMPACT model to estimate the investments required to reduce the global prevalence of hunger below 5%. After 35 years, the increased funding is estimated to increase agricultural output by 10%, reduce the prevalence of hunger by 35%, reduce food prices by 16%, and increase per capita incomes by 4% relative to a counterfactual where funding continues to rise on historical trends. Using an 8% discount rate, the net present value of the costs of agricultural R&D are estimated at $61 billion for the next 35 years, while the net present benefits in terms of net economic surplus (the sum of consumer and producer surplus) are estimated at $2.1 trillion. The central estimate of the benefit-cost ratio (BCR) is 33, consistent with previous research documenting high average returns to agricultural research and development. The central BCR reported in this study places the intervention at the 91st percentile of all previous Copenhagen Consensus BCRs in agriculture, and 87th percentile for all BCRs regardless of sector. Agricultural R&D is likely one of the best uses of resources for the remainder of the Sustainable Development Goals and decades beyond.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 205
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Benefit-cost analysis and the environment - Response
    Arrow, KJ
    Cropper, ML
    Eads, GC
    Hahn, RW
    Lave, LB
    Noll, RG
    Portney, PR
    Russell, M
    Schmalensee, R
    Smith, VK
    Stavins, RN
    SCIENCE, 1996, 272 (5268) : 1572 - 1573
  • [42] Benefit-Cost Analysis for Climate Action
    Bureau, Dominique
    Quinet, Alain
    Schubert, Katheline
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2021, 12 (03) : 494 - 517
  • [43] A Benefit-Cost Analysis of Increased International Migration of Skilled Labor in Africa and the World
    Maskus, Keith E.
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2023, 14 : 301 - 336
  • [44] A benefit-cost analysis of a red drum stock enhancement program in South Carolina
    Rhodes, R. J.
    Whitehead, J. C.
    Smith, T. I. J.
    Denson, M. R.
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2018, 9 (02): : 323 - 341
  • [45] A benefit-cost analysis of a regional Global Ocean Observing System: Seawatch Europe
    Stel, JH
    Mannix, BF
    MARINE POLICY, 1996, 20 (05) : 357 - 376
  • [46] Global climate change: Benefit-cost analysis vs. the precautionary principle
    Hammitt, JK
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2000, 6 (03): : 387 - 398
  • [47] Estimating overall returns to international agricultural research in Africa through benefit-cost analysis: a "best-evidence" approach
    Maredia, Mywish K.
    Raitzer, David Anthony
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 41 (01) : 81 - 100
  • [48] The decision to use benefit transfer or conduct original valuation research for benefit-cost and policy analysis
    Allen, Bryon P.
    Loomis, John B.
    CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2008, 26 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [49] The incompatibility of benefit-cost analysis with sustainability science
    Anderson, Mark
    Teisl, Mario
    Noblet, Caroline
    Klein, Sharon
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2015, 10 (01) : 33 - 41
  • [50] Dynamic Benefit-Cost Analysis for Uncertain Futures
    Dudley, Susan E.
    Perez, Daniel R.
    Mannix, Brian F.
    Carrigan, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2019, 10 (02) : 206 - 225