A randomized controlled trial to compare the live birth rate of the first frozen embryo transfer following the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol vs. the antagonist protocol in women with an anticipated high ovarian response

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Zhi Qin [1 ]
Ai, Ai [1 ]
Zhang, Yuan [1 ]
Li, He [2 ]
Wang, Jing Yun [1 ]
Wang, Lu [1 ]
Ng, Ernest Hung Yu [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Matern & Infant Hosp 1, Ctr Assisted Reprod, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Obstet & Gynecol Hosp, Shanghai Ji Ai Genet & IVF Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Li Ka Shing Fac Med, Sch Clin Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hosp, Li Ka Shing Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol,Sch Clin Med,Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; PITUITARY SUPPRESSION; LH SURGE; IVF; DYDROGESTERONE;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.027
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the live birth rate of the first frozen embryo transfer (FET) after ovarian stimulation by the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol vs. the antagonist protocol in women with an anticipated high ovarian response who were undergoing in vitro fertilization. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: A tertiary assisted reproduction center. Patients: Women with infertility aged <43 years undergoing the first in vitro fertilization cycle and having antral follicle count of >15. Interventions: Medroxyprogesterone 10 mg daily was given from the start of ovarian stimulation until the day of ovulation trigger in the PPOS protocol. In the antagonist protocol, an antagonist 0.25 mg daily was given from the sixth day of ovarian stimulation until the day of ovulation trigger. Blinding was not possible for women or physicians but the biostatistician was blinded to the group assignment. Main Outcome Measure: Live birth rate of the first FET cycle. Results: A total of 784 women were recruited from June 2020 and October 2021 and assigned randomly in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: PPOS group (n = 392) and antagonist group (n = 392). Embryo transfer was either cancelled or postponed in 62 women (62/392, 15.8%) in the PPOS group and 65 (65/392, 16.6%) in the antagonist group because of no transferable embryos or no FET within 6 months after randomization. The two groups were similar in demographic characteristics and the numbers of oocytes obtained or fertilized, cleaving embryos, good-quality embryos at day 3, blastocysts developed, and embryos or blastocysts frozen. There was no statistically significant difference in the live birth rate of the first FET cycle between the PPOS and antagonist groups on the basis of both the intention-to-treat analysis (37.5.0% [147/392] vs. 32.7% [128/392]; relative risk, 1.148 [95% confidence interval, 0.949-1.390]) and per-protocol analysis (44.5% [147/330] vs. 39.1% [128/327]; relative risk, 1.138 [95% confidence interval, 0.950-1.364]). Both groups showed comparable clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and cumulative live birth rates. Conclusion: The live birth rates of the first FET following the PPOS and antagonist protocols were comparable in women with an anticipated high ovarian response.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 945
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of IVF outcomes in women undergoing IVF stimulation using progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) Vs GnRH antagonist (GnRH-Antag) protocol
    Salkar, J.
    Hegde, V.
    Agarwal, A.
    Vytla, D.
    Mogili, I.
    Bommakanti, L.
    Sindu, K.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39
  • [32] Poor prognosis for ovarian response to stimulation: results of a randomised trial comparing the flare-up GnRH agonist protocol vs. the antagonist protocol
    Devesa, Marta
    Martinez, Francisca
    Coroleu, Buenaventura
    Tur, Rosa
    Gonzalez, Clara
    Rodriguez, Ignacio
    Barri, Pedro N.
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2010, 26 (07) : 509 - 515
  • [33] Progesterone protocol versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilization treatments with frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Zhu, Xiuxian
    Ye, Hongjuan
    Ye, Jing
    Fu, Yonglun
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (05)
  • [34] Pregnancy outcome following fresh vs. frozen embryo transfer in women of advanced reproductive age according to their response following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.
    Amui, J.
    Brasile, D.
    Choe, J. K.
    Check, J. H.
    Wilson, C.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2006, 86 : S401 - S401
  • [35] Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation with or without clomiphene citrate supplementation in normal ovulatory women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Liu, Yali
    Chen, Qiuju
    Yu, Sha
    Wang, Yun
    He, Wen
    Chang, Hannah Ya-Ning
    Wang, Bian
    Gao, Hongyuan
    Long, Hui
    Wang, Li
    Lyu, Qifeng
    Ai, Ai
    Kuang, Yanping
    CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 88 (03) : 442 - 452
  • [36] Natural vs. programmed cycles for frozen embryo transfer: study protocol for an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial
    Baksh, Sheriza
    Casper, Anne
    Christianson, Mindy S.
    Devine, Kate
    Doody, Kevin J.
    Ehrhardt, Stephan
    Hansen, Karl R.
    Lathi, Ruth B.
    Timbo, Fatmata
    Usadi, Rebecca
    Vitek, Wendy
    Shade, David M.
    Segars, James
    Baker, Valerie L.
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [37] Natural vs. programmed cycles for frozen embryo transfer: study protocol for an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial
    Sheriza Baksh
    Anne Casper
    Mindy S. Christianson
    Kate Devine
    Kevin J. Doody
    Stephan Ehrhardt
    Karl R. Hansen
    Ruth B. Lathi
    Fatmata Timbo
    Rebecca Usadi
    Wendy Vitek
    David M. Shade
    James Segars
    Valerie L. Baker
    Trials, 22
  • [38] Live birth after fresh embryo transfer vs elective embryo cryopreservation/frozen embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing IVF (FreFro-PCOS): study protocol for a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial
    Shi, Yuhua
    Wei, Daimin
    Liang, Xiaoyan
    Sun, Yun
    Liu, Jiayin
    Cao, Yunxia
    Zhang, Bo
    Legro, Richard S.
    Zhang, Heping
    Chen, Zi-Jiang
    TRIALS, 2014, 15
  • [39] Fertility outcomes in women after controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist long protocol: fresh versus frozen embryo transfer
    Ding, Xiaoyan
    Yang, Jingwei
    Li, Lan
    Yang, Na
    Lan, Ling
    Huang, Guoning
    Ye, Hong
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [40] Live birth after fresh embryo transfer vs elective embryo cryopreservation/frozen embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing IVF (FreFro-PCOS): study protocol for a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial
    Yuhua Shi
    Daimin Wei
    Xiaoyan Liang
    Yun Sun
    Jiayin Liu
    Yunxia Cao
    Bo Zhang
    Richard S Legro
    Heping Zhang
    Zi-Jiang Chen
    Trials, 15