Impact of management strategies on forest susceptibility to spruce bark beetle damage and potential trade-offs with timber production and biodiversity

被引:0
|
作者
Fustel, Teresa Lopez-Andujar [1 ]
Ohman, Karin [1 ]
Klapwijk, Maartje [2 ]
Nordkvist, Michelle [2 ]
Sangstuvall, Lars [3 ]
Lamas, Tomas [1 ]
Eggers, Jeannette [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Resource Management, SE-90183 Umea, Sweden
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Ecol, Box 7044, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Bergvik Skog Ost, Sveavagen 9, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Spruce bark beetle; Forest management; Optimization; Trade-off; Forest susceptibility; Management strategies; IPS-TYPOGRAPHUS L; NORWAY SPRUCE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; PICEA-ABIES; STORM; INFESTATION; DISTURBANCE; ATTACKS; MOUNTAINS; OUTBREAKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2024.121964
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The European spruce bark beetle (SBB) is an important insect pest in many countries such as Sweden and has caused the loss of millions of trees over the past few decades. Forest management targeting key variables in the forest can be a potential tool to decrease SBB susceptibility. In this paper, we simulated forest development over a 70-year planning horizon and evaluated the effect of different forest management strategies on spruce bark beetle susceptibility, timber production and biodiversity indicators. We used national forest inventory plots located in Kronoberg county, Southern Sweden, from 2016 to 2020 to perform the analyses. A reference strategy mimicking current management practices was simulated and compared with four other management strategies that can be an alternative to decrease spruce bark beetle damage. The four management strategies were (1) mixed forest stands, (2) shorter rotations and no thinnings, (3) prolonged rotations and (4) continuous cover forestry. The strategies differed in how and when regeneration, pre-commercial thinning, thinnings and final fellings were performed. The optimization of each of the strategies was aimed at reducing spruce bark beetle susceptibility while simultaneously investigating trade-offs with a range of timber production demands. In addition, we simulated a combined strategy where any of the strategies could be chosen with the objective of reducing spruce bark beetle susceptibility. Also, we evaluated each strategy with respect to biodiversity indicators described in the Swedish environmental quality objective Living Forests. The results show that a combination of all strategies is the most effective option to manage the forest to achieve the lowest average susceptibility in the analysed forest area. Shorter rotation management also resulted in low susceptibility. In addition, management strategies leading to large reductions in the abundance of large stem diameter Norway spruce trees in the landscape achieve lower susceptibility values. Our results suggest that various management strategies, alone or in combination with others, can be successfully employed to decrease forest susceptibility to spruce bark beetle damage. However, achieving multiple management objectives simultaneously, such as timber production and promotion of biodiversity, may require additional constraints in the mathematical models in addition to the settings used to describe each of the strategies. Future work should explore incorporating these additional constraints to better optimize management decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Experimental evaluation of herbicide use on biodiversity, ecosystem services and timber production trade-offs in forest plantations
    Stokely, Thomas D.
    Kormann, Urs G.
    Verschuyl, Jake
    Kroll, Andrew J.
    Frey, David W.
    Harris, Scott H.
    Mainwaring, Doug
    Maguire, Doug
    Hatten, Jeff A.
    Rivers, James W.
    Fitzgerald, Stephen
    Betts, Matthew G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2022, 59 (01) : 52 - 66
  • [2] Modest trade-offs between timber management and fire susceptibility of a Bolivian semi-deciduous forest
    Blate, GM
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2005, 15 (05) : 1649 - 1663
  • [3] Forest management scenarios in a changing climate: trade-offs between carbon, timber, and old forest
    Creutzburg, Megan K.
    Scheller, Robert M.
    Lucash, Melissa S.
    LeDuc, Stephen D.
    Johnson, Mark G.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2017, 27 (02) : 503 - 518
  • [4] How Forest Management affects Ecosystem Services, including Timber Production and Economic Return: Synergies and Trade-Offs
    Duncker, Philipp S.
    Raulund-Rasmussen, Karsten
    Gundersen, Per
    Katzensteiner, Klaus
    De Jong, Johnny
    Ravn, Hans Peter
    Smith, Mike
    Eckmuellner, Otto
    Spiecker, Heinrich
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2012, 17 (04):
  • [5] Modelling for forest management synergies and trade-offs: Northern hardwood tree regeneration, timber and deer
    Millington, James D. A.
    Walters, Michael B.
    Matonis, Megan S.
    Liu, Jianguo
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2013, 248 : 103 - 112
  • [6] Composition and Elevation of Spruce Forests Affect Susceptibility to Bark Beetle Attacks: Implications for Forest Management
    Faccoli, Massimo
    Bernardinelli, Iris
    [J]. FORESTS, 2014, 5 (01): : 88 - 102
  • [7] Land-use trade-offs between tree biodiversity and crop production in the Atlantic Forest
    Marcilio-Silva, Vinicius
    Marques, Marcia C. M.
    Cavender-Bares, Jeannine
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2018, 32 (05) : 1074 - 1084
  • [8] Promoting Multiple-use Forest Management: Which trade-offs in the timber concessions of Central Africa?
    Lescuyer, Guillaume
    Mvongo-Nkene, Mikhail Nelson
    Monville, Guillaume
    Elanga-Voundi, Marcien Boris
    Kakundika, Tito
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 349 : 20 - 28
  • [9] Forest Biodiversity, Carbon Sequestration, and Wood Production: Modeling Synergies and Trade-Offs for Ten Forest Landscapes Across Europe
    Biber, Peter
    Felton, Adam
    Nieuwenhuis, Maarten
    Lindbladh, Matts
    Black, Kevin
    Bahyl, Jan
    Bingol, Ozkan
    Borges, Jose G.
    Botequim, Brigite
    Brukas, Vilis
    Bugalho, Miguel N.
    Corradini, Giulia
    Eriksson, Ljusk Ola
    Forsell, Nicklas
    Hengeveld, Geerten M.
    Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke A.
    Kadiogullari, Ali Ihsan
    Karahalil, Uzay
    Lodin, Isak
    Lundholm, Anders
    Makrickiene, Ekaterina
    Masiero, Mauro
    Mozgeris, Gintautas
    Pivoriunas, Nerijus
    Poschenrieder, Werner
    Pretzsch, Hans
    Sedmak, Robert
    Tucek, Jan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2020, 8
  • [10] Management Strategies for Wood Fuel Harvesting-Trade-Offs with Biodiversity and Forest Ecosystem Services
    Eggers, Jeannette
    Melin, Ylva
    Lundstrom, Johanna
    Bergstrom, Dan
    Ohman, Karin
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (10)