Land-use trade-offs between tree biodiversity and crop production in the Atlantic Forest

被引:8
|
作者
Marcilio-Silva, Vinicius [1 ]
Marques, Marcia C. M. [1 ]
Cavender-Bares, Jeannine [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Parana, Setor Ciencias Biol, Lab Ecol Vegetal, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Univ Minnesota, Inst Environm, Dept Ecol Evolut & Behav, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
biodiversity measurement; cropland; deforestation; ecosystem services; sustainability; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; PATTERNS; DIVERSITY; INTENSIFICATION; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSERVATION; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.13138
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Trade-offs in ecosystem services (ES) have received increasing attention because provisioning services often come at the expense of biodiversity loss. When land-use patterns are not maximally efficient relative to productivity, provisioning services, such as crop production, can often be increased without losing biodiversity. The Atlantic Forest (AF) encompasses dense, mixed, and seasonal forests and has high levels of endemism and anthropogenic threat. We examined trade-offs between biodiversity and crop production in the AF to provide insights into land-use management decisions. We developed a biodiversity metric that combines information on tree species richness, evolutionary distinctiveness, and rarity at the local level. We examined the extent to which the nature of ES trade-offs differ among the 3 forest types. We assessed how annual deforestation rates and land management practices affect biodiversity and agricultural revenues. Finally, we tested whether it is possible to achieve the same total regional revenue without reducing biodiversity by improving local management practices. The 3 forest types had similar patterns in ES trade-offs, although within mixed forest patterns differed. Biodiversity appeared to be more sensitive to land-use change than crop revenues. Certain crops yielded up to 10 times higher values in some sites. Enhanced crop productivity may increase revenues without reducing biodiversity. Our results showed that to enhance human well-being without further conversion of AF, maximizing crop productivity is needed . Increasing efficiency of management outcomes by maintaining higher biodiversity and increasing provisioning services depends on knowledge of forest type, the comparative advantage of planting crops in the best places, and preserving species in a balanced manner across forests. Compensaciones de Uso de Suelo entre la Biodiversidad de arboles y la Produccion Agricola en el Bosque Atlantico Las compensaciones en los servicios ecosistemicos (SE) han recibido mayor atencion porque los servicios de aprovisionamiento a menudo conllevan la perdida de biodiversidad. Cuando los patrones de uso de suelo no son maximamente eficientes en relacion con la productividad, los servicios de aprovisionamiento, como la produccion agricola, a menudo pueden ser incrementados sin perder biodiversidad. El Bosque Atlantico (BA) comprende bosques densos, mixtos y estacionales y tiene altos niveles de endemismo y amenazas antropogenicas. Examinamos las compensaciones entre biodiversidad y produccion agricola en el BA para proporcionar ideas para las decisiones de manejo de uso de suelo. Desarrollamos una medida de la biodiversidad que combina informacion sobre la riqueza de arboles, la singularidad evolutiva y rareza a nivel local Examinamos el grado en que la naturaleza de las compensaciones de los SE difiere entre los 3 tipos de bosque. Evaluamos como afectan las tasas anuales de deforestacion y las practicas de manejo a la biodiversidad y a las ganancias agricolas. Finalmente, probamos si es posible obtener la misma ganancia regional total son reducir la biodiversidad mediante la mejora de las practicas de manejo locales. Los 3 tipos de bosque tuvieron patrones similares de compensaciones de SE, aunque los patrones difirieron en los bosques mixtos. La biodiversidad parecio ser mas sensible al cambio de uso de suelo que a las ganancias agricolas. Ciertos cultivos proporcionaron valores 10 veces mas altos en algunos sitios. El incremento de la produccion agricola puede incrementar las ganancias sin reducir la biodiversidad. Nuestros resultados muestran que para incrementar el bienestar humano sin mayor alteracion del BA se requiere maximizar la produccion agricola. El incremento de la eficiencia del manejo al mantener mas biodiversidad y aumentar los servicios de aprovisionamiento depende del conocimiento del tipo de bosque, de la ventaja comparativa de sembrar cultivos en los mejores sitios y la preservacion de especies de manera equilibrada en los bosques. Resumen ???? ???????????????????, ????????????????????????????????????????????, ????????????????, ????????????????????????????????, ????, ????????????????????????????????????????????, ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????, ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????, ???????????????????, ????????????????????????????????????????????, ????????????????????, ???????????????????????, ????????????????????????, ??????????????????????????, ??????????????????????????, ??????????????????????????????????????????????, ???????????????????????, ???????????????????????: ???; ??: ???? Article impact statement: Human well-being can be enhanced without further conversion of Atlantic Forest by improving agricultural practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1074 / 1084
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating conservation and forestry production: Exploring trade-offs between biodiversity and production in regional land-use assessment
    Faith, DP
    Walker, PA
    Ive, JR
    Belbin, L
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 85 (1-3) : 251 - 260
  • [2] TRADE-OFFS BETWEEN NON MARKET AND MARKET LAND-USE - CROP PRODUCTION, FORESTRY, AND OUTDOOR RECREATION
    MUSSER, WN
    ZIEMER, RF
    WHITE, FC
    GEORGIA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION RESEARCH BULLETIN, 1982, (270): : 1 - 23
  • [3] Identifying trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services delivery for land-use decisions
    Constance Fastré
    Hugh P. Possingham
    Diederik Strubbe
    Erik Matthysen
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [4] Identifying trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services delivery for land-use decisions
    Fastre, Constance
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Strubbe, Diederik
    Matthysen, Erik
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [5] Land-use trade-offs in the Kapuas peat forest, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
    Suwarno, Aritta
    Hein, Lars
    Weikard, Hans-Peter
    van Noordwijk, Meine
    Nugroho, Bayu
    LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 75 : 340 - 351
  • [6] Global bioenergy scenarios - Future forest development, land-use implications, and trade-offs
    Kraxner, Florian
    Nordstrom, Eva-Maria
    Havlik, Petr
    Gusti, Mykola
    Mosnier, Aline
    Frank, Stefan
    Valin, Hugo
    Fritz, Steffen
    Fuss, Sabine
    Kindermann, Georg
    McCallum, Ian
    Khabarov, Nikolay
    Boettcher, Hannes
    See, Linda
    Aoki, Kentaro
    Schmid, Erwin
    Mathe, Laszlo
    Obersteiner, Michael
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2013, 57 : 86 - 96
  • [7] Environmental Impacts of Water Use in Global Crop Production: Hotspots and Trade-Offs with Land Use
    Pfister, Stephan
    Bayer, Peter
    Koehler, Annette
    Hellweg, Stefanie
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (13) : 5761 - 5768
  • [8] Assessing the impact of changes in land-use intensity and climate on simulated trade-offs between crop yield and nitrogen leaching
    Blanke, Jan Hendrik
    Olin, Stefan
    Sturck, Julia
    Sahlin, Ullrika
    Lindeskog, Mats
    Helming, John
    Lehsten, Veiko
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 239 : 385 - 398
  • [9] Analytical Solutions to Trade-Offs between Size of Protected Areas and Land-Use Intensity
    Butsic, Van
    Radeloff, Volker C.
    Kuemmerle, Tobias
    Pidgeon, Anna M.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2012, 26 (05) : 883 - 893
  • [10] Spatial land use trade-offs for maintenance of biodiversity, biofuel, and agriculture
    Kathrine D. Behrman
    Thomas E. Juenger
    James R. Kiniry
    Timothy H. Keitt
    Landscape Ecology, 2015, 30 : 1987 - 1999