Effects of cyclic loading on soil-geogrid interaction characteristics

被引:0
|
作者
Ferreira, Fernanda B. [1 ]
Vieira, Castorina S. [1 ]
Lopes, Maria de Lurdes [1 ]
Ferreira, Pedro G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, CONSTRUCT, Fac Engn, R Dr Roberto Frias, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
关键词
pullout test; soil-geogrid interaction; cyclic and post-cyclic interface response; residual soil from granite; BEHAVIOR; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1051/e3sconf/202454410005
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The benefits of geosynthetic-reinforced soil systems over conventional earth-retaining structures are now well established. These reinforced systems are often subjected not only to static loads, but also to seismic and/or traffic loads, in which case the effects of repeated loading on soil-geosynthetic interaction characteristics should be properly considered. This study investigates the behaviour of a geogrid typically used for soil reinforcement under cyclic pullout loading through load-controlled laboratory pullout tests. To examine the influence of cyclic loading amplitude, number of cycles and static pullout force acting on the geogrid at the onset of cyclic loading, distinct loading patterns are considered. A well-graded residual soil from granite is used as backfill material. A comparison between the cyclic and monotonic pullout response of the reinforcement is then established in order to identify any potential strength loss attributed to cyclic loading. The experimental results show that the ultimate pullout resistance of the geogrid embedded in medium dense residual soil from granite may be adversely affected by cyclic loading. The cumulative cyclic displacements of the reinforcement are more pronounced during the initial loading cycles, but tend to stabilize with the increasing number of cycles when the soil is densely compacted. In the presence of dense soil, the cyclic strains of the geogrid specimen are particularly significant at the front section and almost negligible towards the back end.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reliability analysis of soil-geogrid pullout models in Japan
    Miyata, Yoshihisa
    Bathurst, Richard J.
    [J]. SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2012, 52 (04) : 620 - 633
  • [22] Finite-element modelling of soil-geogrid interaction dealing with the pullout behaviour of geogrids
    Yan Shuwang
    Feng Shouzhong
    B. Barr
    [J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 1998, 14 (4) : 371 - 382
  • [23] Anisotropic Shear Strength Behavior of Soil-Geogrid Interfaces
    Zhang, Jun
    Ji, Mingchang
    Jia, Yafei
    Miao, Chenxi
    Wang, Cheng
    Zhao, Ziyang
    Zheng, Yewei
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (23):
  • [24] Evaluation of Soil-Geogrid Pullout Models Using a Statistical Approach
    Huang, Bingquan
    Bathurst, Richard J.
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL, 2009, 32 (06): : 489 - 504
  • [25] Effect of strip footing on the stress-strain behavior of soil-geogrid interaction: A new simple concept
    Ahmad, Hussein
    Mahboubi, Ahmad
    [J]. GEOSYNTHETICS: LEADING THE WAY TO A RESILIENT PLANET, 12ICG 2023, 2024, : 1034 - 1040
  • [26] A Short Review on the Dynamic Characteristics of Geogrid-Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls under Cyclic Loading
    Geng, Min
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 2021
  • [27] Cyclic loading effects on soil-energy pile interaction
    Xiao, S.
    Suleiman, M. T.
    Elzeiny, R.
    Al-Khawaja, M. J.
    [J]. ENERGY GEOTECHNICS, 2016, : 529 - 534
  • [28] Some factors affecting the results of soil-geogrid direct shear test
    Nakamura, T
    Ikeura, I
    Mitachi, T
    [J]. EARTH REINFORCEMENT, VOL 1, 1996, : 123 - 128
  • [29] Effect of Surface Roughness on Soil-Geogrid/Geotextile Interface Shear Strengths
    Chai, Jin-chun
    Saito, Akinori
    Hino, Takenori
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOSYNTHETICS AND GROUND ENGINEERING, 2024, 10 (03)
  • [30] Shear behaviors of geogrid reinforced saline soil under vertical cyclic loading
    Hou, Juan
    Chu, Chenxi
    Sun, Yinyu
    Weng, Ping
    Ma, Yanxia
    Zhang, Wuyu
    [J]. Yanshilixue Yu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2023, 42 : 3832 - 3841