Pulsed field ablation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: an ex vivo assessment of safety

被引:0
|
作者
Lennerz, Carsten [1 ,2 ]
O'Connor, Matthew [3 ]
Schaarschmidt, Claudia [1 ]
Reents, Tilko [1 ]
Bourier, Felix [1 ]
Telishevska, Marta [1 ]
Lengauer, Sarah [1 ]
Popa, Miruna [1 ]
Wimbauer, Katharina [1 ]
Holmgren, Ellen [1 ]
Thoma, Mara [1 ]
Spitzauer, Lovis [1 ]
Bahlke, Fabian [1 ]
Krafft, Hannah [1 ]
Englert, Florian [1 ]
Knoll, Katharina [1 ,2 ]
Friedrich, Lena [1 ]
Blazek, Patrick [1 ]
Hessling, Gabriele [1 ]
Kolb, Christof [1 ]
Deisenhofer, Isabel [1 ]
Kottmaier, Marc [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, German Heart Ctr Munich, Dept Electrophysiol, Lazarettstr 36, D-80636 Munich, Germany
[2] German Ctr Cardiovasc Res DZHK, Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
[3] Auckland City Hosp, Cardiol Dept, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Electromagnetic interference; Pulsed field ablation; Atrial fibrillation ablation; Pacemaker; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10840-024-01758-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Pulse field ablation (PFA) is a novel catheter ablation technology with potential safety benefits due to its tissue selectivity. It has the potential to directly damage or interact with the functionality of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in the form of electromagnetic interference (EMI). The aim of our study was to assess the impact of PFA on CIEDs. Methods PFA lesions (45 per CIED) were applied from the Farapulse system to CIEDs (< 5 cm from the lead tip and < 15 cm from the generator). All devices were checked before and after PFA application for proper sensing and pacing functionality as well as for integrity of shock circuits in ICDs using a heart simulator. Moreover, devices were then interrogated for any spontaneous reprogramming, mode switching or other EMI effects. Results In total, 44 CIEDs were tested (16 pacemaker, 21 ICDs, 7 CRT-P/D) with 1980 PFA applications. There was no change in device settings, functionality and electrical parameters, and there was no macroscopic damage to the devices. The risk of damage to the electric components or leads on a patient-based analysis is 0/44 (95% CI 0-8%) and on a PFA pulse-based analysis is 0/1980 (95% CI 0-0.2%). Clinically relevant EMI appeared with oversensing and pacing inhibition but not tachycardia detection. Conclusions Bipolar PFA appears safe and does not result in damage to CIEDs or leads. Clinically relevant EMI does occur, but appropriate peri-procedural programming may mitigate this. In vivo studies are needed to confirm our findings.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Perioperative management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Bryant, H. C.
    Roberts, P. R.
    Diprose, P.
    [J]. BJA EDUCATION, 2016, 16 (11) : 388 - 396
  • [32] Use of Implantable Electronic Devices in Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis
    John, Roy M.
    Stern, David L.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 36 (03) : 408 - 415
  • [33] Perioperative management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Stone, M. E.
    Salter, B.
    Fischer, A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 107 : 16 - 26
  • [34] Radiation therapy in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Niedziela, Jacek T.
    Blamek, Slawomir
    Gadula-Gacek, Elibieta
    Gorol, Jaroslaw
    Kurek, Anna
    Witek, Mateusz
    Wojtaszczyk, Adam
    Plaza, Przemyslaw
    Miszczyk, Leszek
    Gasior, Mariusz
    Tajstra, Mateusz
    [J]. KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2021, 79 (02) : 156 - 160
  • [35] Endoscopic Electrosurgery in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Baeg, Myong Ki
    Kim, Sang-Woo
    Ko, Sun-Hye
    Lee, Yoon Bum
    Hwang, Seawon
    Lee, Bong-Woo
    Choi, Hye Jin
    Park, Jae Myung
    Lee, In-Seok
    Oh, Yong-Seog
    Choi, Myung-Gyu
    [J]. CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 49 (02) : 176 - 181
  • [36] Sudden Death in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Tseng, Zian H.
    Hayward, Robert M.
    Clark, Nina M.
    Mulvanny, Christopher G.
    Colburn, Benjamin J.
    Ursell, Philip C.
    Olgin, Jeffrey E.
    Hart, Amy P.
    Moffatt, Ellen
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 175 (08) : 1342 - 1350
  • [37] Surgical Wound Nursing Assessment and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Do Carmo, J.
    Ferreira, Maria Joao M. J. F.
    Carvalho, Ana Filipa A. F. C.
    Oliveira, Catarina C. O.
    Pinto, Antonio A. P.
    Cunha, Pedro Silva P. S. C.
    Ferreira, Rui R. F.
    Oliveira, Mario M. O.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2021, 20 : 125 - 125
  • [38] Measuring the psychological and social dimensions in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a needed assessment
    Barisone, Michela
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2024, 23 (05) : e57 - e58
  • [39] Long-term efficacy and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices and transvenous leads
    Dinshaw, Leon
    Schaeffer, Benjamin
    Akbulak, Oezgg
    Jularic, Mario
    Hartmann, Jens
    Klatt, Niklas
    Dickow, Jannis
    Gunawardene, Melanie
    Muenkler, Paula
    Hakmi, Samer
    Pecha, Simon
    Sultan, Arian
    Lueker, Jakob
    Pinnschmidt, Hans
    Hoffmann, Boris
    Gosau, Nils
    Eickholt, Christian
    Willems, Stephan
    Steven, Daniel
    Meyer, Christian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 30 (05) : 679 - 687
  • [40] Cybersecurity: The need for data and patient safety with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Das, Subrat
    Siroky, Gregory P.
    Lee, Shawn
    Mehta, Davendra
    Suri, Ranjit
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2021, 18 (03) : 473 - 481