Integrating Machine Learning into an SMT-Based Planning Approach for Production Planning in Cyber-Physical Production Systems

被引:0
|
作者
Heesch, Rene [1 ]
Ehrhardt, Jonas [1 ]
Niggemann, Oliver [1 ]
机构
[1] Helmut Schmidt Univ, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
AI Planning; Cyber-Physical Production System; Machine Learning; SMT;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-50485-3_33
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Cyber-Physical Production Systems (CPPS) are highly complex systems, making the application of AI planning approaches for production planning challenging. Most AI planning approaches require comprehensive domain descriptions, which model the functional dependencies within the CPPS. Though, due to their high complexity, creating such domain descriptions manually is considered difficult, tedious, and error-prone. Therefore, we propose a novel generic planning approach, which can integrate mathematical formulas or Machine Learning models into a symbolic SMT-based planning algorithm, thus shedding the need for complex manually created models. Our approach uses a feature-vector-based state-space representation as an interface of symbolic and sub-symbolic AI, and can identify a solution to CPPS planning problems by determining the required production steps, their sequence, and their parametrization. We evaluate our approach on twelve planning problems from a real CPPS, demonstrating its ability to express complex dependencies within production steps as mathematical formulas or integrating ML models.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 331
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implementing cyber-physical production systems in learning factories
    Thiede, Sebastian
    Juraschek, Max
    Herrmann, Christoph
    6TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON LEARNING FACTORIES, 2016, 54 : 7 - 12
  • [22] CP3L: A Cyber-Physical Production Planning Language
    Anis, Anas
    Afer, Wilhelm Sch
    Pines, Andrey
    Niggemann, Oliver
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2015 IEEE 20TH CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES & FACTORY AUTOMATION (ETFA), 2015,
  • [23] Approach for an event-driven production control for cyber-physical production systems
    Berger, Christoph
    Zipfel, Alexander
    Braunreuther, Stefan
    Reinhart, Gunther
    12TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTATION IN MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, 2019, 79 : 349 - 354
  • [24] Production Process Interoperability for Cyber-Physical Production Systems
    Weichhart, Georg
    Mangler, Juergen
    Mayr-Dorn, Christoph
    Egyed, Alexander
    Haemmerle, Alexander
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2021, 54 (01): : 906 - 911
  • [25] A Comparison of Modeling Approaches for Planning in Cyber Physical Production Systems
    Anis, Anas
    Schaefer, Wilhelm
    Niggemann, Oliver
    2014 IEEE EMERGING TECHNOLOGY AND FACTORY AUTOMATION (ETFA), 2014,
  • [26] One-of-a-kind Production in Cyber-Physical Production Systems Considering Machine Failures
    Vinci Carlavan, Guido
    Alejandro Rossit, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED DESIGN & PROCESS SCIENCE, 2021, 25 (02) : 100 - 119
  • [27] An Approach of Cyber-Physical Production Systems Architecture for Robot Control
    Garcia, Carlos A.
    Lanas, David
    Alvarez M, Edison
    Altamirano, Santiago
    Garcia, Marcelo, V
    IECON 2018 - 44TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY, 2018, : 2847 - 2852
  • [28] An SMT-Based Approach to Motion Planning for Multiple Robots With Complex Constraints
    Imeson, Frank
    Smith, Stephen L.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS, 2019, 35 (03) : 669 - 684
  • [29] Secure Control for Cyber-physical Systems Based on Machine Learning
    Liu K.
    Ma S.-H.
    Ma A.-Y.
    Zhang Q.-R.
    Xia Y.-Q.
    Zidonghua Xuebao/Acta Automatica Sinica, 2021, 47 (06): : 1273 - 1283
  • [30] Rule-Based With Machine Learning IDS for DDoS Attack Detection in Cyber-Physical Production Systems (CPPS)
    Hussain, Ayaz
    Marin Tordera, Eva
    Masip-Bruin, Xavi
    Leligou, Helen C.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 114894 - 114911