Harnessing ML and GIS for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Risk Prioritization

被引:0
|
作者
Shalu [1 ]
Acharya, Twinkle [1 ]
Gharekhan, Dhwanilnath [1 ]
Samal, Anddipak [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Environm Planning & Technol CEPT Univ, Fac Technol, Kasturbhai Lalbhai Campus, Ahmadabad 380009, India
[2] Tata Inst Social Sci, VN Purav Marg, Mumbai 400088, India
来源
关键词
Machine learning; earthquake; artificial neural network; random forest; seismic vulnerability; HAZARD; INDIA;
D O I
10.32604/rig.2024.051788
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Seismic vulnerability modeling plays a crucial role in seismic risk assessment, aiding decision-makers in pinpointing areas and structures most prone to earthquake damage. While machine learning (ML) algorithms and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have emerged as promising tools for seismic vulnerability modeling, there remains a notable gap in comprehensive geospatial studies focused on India. Previous studies in seismic vulnerability modeling have primarily focused on specific regions or countries, often overlooking the unique challenges and characteristics of India. In this study, we introduce a novel approach to seismic vulnerability modeling, leveraging ML and GIS to address these gaps. Employing Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Random Forest algorithms, we predict damage intensity values for earthquake events based on various factors such as location, depth, land cover, proximity to major roads, rivers, soil type, population density, and distance from fault lines. A case study in the Satara district of Maharashtra underscores the effectiveness of our model in identifying vulnerable buildings and enhancing seismic risk assessment at a local level. This innovative approach not only fills the gap in existing research by providing predictive modeling for seismic damage intensity but also offers a valuable tool for disaster management and urban planning decision-makers.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 134
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of seismic vulnerability of structures
    Elnashai, Amr S.
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2006, 62 (11) : 1134 - 1147
  • [22] Seismic vulnerability assessment for Montreal
    Yu, Keyan
    Chouinard, Luc E.
    Rosset, Philippe
    GEORISK-ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF RISK FOR ENGINEERED SYSTEMS AND GEOHAZARDS, 2016, 10 (02) : 164 - 178
  • [23] Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Assessment of Urban Infrastructure and Utility Systems
    Poudel, A.
    Argyroudis, S.
    Pitilakis, D.
    Pitilakis, K.
    LIFELINES 2022: 1971 SAN FERNANDO EARTHQUAKE AND LIFELINE INFRASTRUCTURE, 2022, : 914 - 926
  • [24] Impact of vulnerability assumptions and input parameters in urban seismic risk assessment
    Hoyos, M. C.
    Hernandez, A. F.
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 19 (11) : 4407 - 4434
  • [25] Prioritization of disaster risk in a community using GIS
    Costas Armenakis
    N. Nirupama
    Natural Hazards, 2013, 66 : 15 - 29
  • [26] Prioritization of disaster risk in a community using GIS
    Armenakis, Costas
    Nirupama, N.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2013, 66 (01) : 15 - 29
  • [27] Impact of vulnerability assumptions and input parameters in urban seismic risk assessment
    M. C. Hoyos
    A. F. Hernández
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 19 : 4407 - 4434
  • [28] Towards the updated Italian seismic risk assessment: exposure and vulnerability modelling
    Angelo Masi
    Sergio Lagomarsino
    Mauro Dolce
    Vincenzo Manfredi
    Daria Ottonelli
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 19 : 3253 - 3286
  • [29] Development of Seismic Risk Scenarios Based on a Hybrid Method of Vulnerability Assessment
    A. J. Kappos
    K. C. Stylianidis
    K. Pitilakis
    Natural Hazards, 1998, 17 : 177 - 192
  • [30] Development of seismic risk scenarios based on a hybrid method of vulnerability assessment
    Kappos, AJ
    Stylianidis, KC
    Pitilakis, K
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 1998, 17 (02) : 177 - 192