Cortical Morphology in Cannabis Use Disorder: Implications for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment

被引:1
|
作者
Soleimani, Ghazaleh [1 ]
Towhidkhah, Farzad [1 ]
Saviz, Mehrdad [1 ]
Ekhtiari, Hamed [2 ]
机构
[1] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Fac Biomed Engn, Dept Biomed Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Laureate Inst Brain Res, Tulsa, OK USA
关键词
tDCS; Individual differences; Cortical morphology; Computational head models; Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Substance use disorder; SURFACE-BASED ANALYSIS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; ELECTRIC-FIELD; ORBITOFRONTAL CORTEX; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; BRAIN; TDCS; MOTOR; THICKNESS; REGIONS;
D O I
10.32598/bcn.2021.3400.1
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been studied as an adjunctive treatment option for substance use disorders (SUDs). Alterations in brain structure following SUD may change tDCS-induced electric field (EF) and subsequent responses; however, grouplevel differences between healthy controls (HC) and participants with SUDs in terms of EF and its association with cortical architecture have not yet been modeled quantitatively. This study provides a methodology for group-level analysis of computational head models to investigate the influence of cortical morphology metrics on EFs. Methods: Whole-brain surface-based morphology was conducted, and cortical thickness, volume, and surface area were compared between participants with cannabis use disorders (CUD) (n=20) and age-matched HC (n=22). Meanwhile, EFs were simulated for bilateral tDCS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The effects of structural alterations on EF distribution were investigated based on individualized computational head models. Results: Regarding EF, no significant difference was found within the prefrontal cortex; however, EFs were significantly different in left-postcentral and right-superior temporal gyrus (P<0.05) with higher levels of variance in CUD compared to HC [F-(39,F- 43)=5.31, P<0.0001, C=0.95]. Significant differences were observed in cortical area (caudal anterior cingulate and rostral middle frontal), thickness (lateral orbitofrontal), and volume (paracentral and fusiform) between the two groups. Conclusion: Brain morphology and tDCS-induced EFs may be changed following CUD; however, differences between CUD and HCs in EFs do not always overlap with brain areas that show structural alterations. To sufficiently modulate stimulation targets, whether individuals with CUD need different stimulation doses based on tDCS target location should be checked.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 662
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Major Depressive Disorder
    Gersten, Maia
    Jamil, Asif
    Cassano, Paolo
    Camprodon, Joan A.
    PSYCHIATRIC ANNALS, 2022, 52 (11) : 451 - 455
  • [22] Transcranial direct current stimulation for hyperactivity and noncompliance in autistic disorder
    D'Urso, Giordano
    Bruzzese, Dario
    Ferrucci, Roberta
    Priori, Alberto
    Pascotto, Antonio
    Galderisi, Silvana
    Altamura, Alfredo Carlo
    Bravaccio, Carmela
    WORLD JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 16 (05): : 361 - 366
  • [23] Practical use and indications of transcranial direct current stimulation
    Mares, T.
    Albrecht, J.
    Buday, J.
    Ceresnakova, S.
    Raboch, J.
    Anders, M.
    CESKA A SLOVENSKA NEUROLOGIE A NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2019, 82 (01) : 37 - 47
  • [24] Daily transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) leads to greater increases in cortical excitability than second daily transcranial direct current stimulation
    Alonzo, Angelo
    Brassil, Joseph
    Taylor, Janet L.
    Martin, Donel
    Loo, Colleen K.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2012, 5 (03) : 208 - 213
  • [25] Effects of cortical anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on swallowing biomechanics
    Doeltgen, Sebastian H.
    Rigney, Lakkari
    Cock, Charles
    Omari, Taher
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2018, 30 (11):
  • [26] Modulation of cortical excitability in man using transcranial direct current stimulation
    Nitsche, MA
    Liebetanz, D
    Tergau, F
    Paulus, W
    NERVENARZT, 2002, 73 (04): : 332 - 335
  • [27] Transcranial direct current stimulation as a treatment for auditory hallucinations
    Koops, Sanne
    van den Brink, Hilde
    Sommer, Iris E. C.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [28] Transcranial direct-current stimulation as treatment in epilepsy
    Gschwind, Markus
    Seeck, Margitta
    EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2016, 16 (12) : 1427 - 1441
  • [29] Treatment of major depression with transcranial direct current stimulation
    Fregni, F
    Boggio, PS
    Nitsche, MA
    Marcolin, MA
    Rigonatti, SP
    Pascual-Leone, A
    BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2006, 8 (02) : 203 - 204
  • [30] Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) - a treatment for depression
    Ferrucci, R.
    Bortolomasi, M.
    Fumagalli, M.
    Giacopuzzi, M.
    Mameli, F.
    Priori, A.
    Scelzo, E.
    Vergari, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 15 : 23 - 23