Cortical Morphology in Cannabis Use Disorder: Implications for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment

被引:1
|
作者
Soleimani, Ghazaleh [1 ]
Towhidkhah, Farzad [1 ]
Saviz, Mehrdad [1 ]
Ekhtiari, Hamed [2 ]
机构
[1] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Fac Biomed Engn, Dept Biomed Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Laureate Inst Brain Res, Tulsa, OK USA
关键词
tDCS; Individual differences; Cortical morphology; Computational head models; Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Substance use disorder; SURFACE-BASED ANALYSIS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; ELECTRIC-FIELD; ORBITOFRONTAL CORTEX; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; BRAIN; TDCS; MOTOR; THICKNESS; REGIONS;
D O I
10.32598/bcn.2021.3400.1
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been studied as an adjunctive treatment option for substance use disorders (SUDs). Alterations in brain structure following SUD may change tDCS-induced electric field (EF) and subsequent responses; however, grouplevel differences between healthy controls (HC) and participants with SUDs in terms of EF and its association with cortical architecture have not yet been modeled quantitatively. This study provides a methodology for group-level analysis of computational head models to investigate the influence of cortical morphology metrics on EFs. Methods: Whole-brain surface-based morphology was conducted, and cortical thickness, volume, and surface area were compared between participants with cannabis use disorders (CUD) (n=20) and age-matched HC (n=22). Meanwhile, EFs were simulated for bilateral tDCS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The effects of structural alterations on EF distribution were investigated based on individualized computational head models. Results: Regarding EF, no significant difference was found within the prefrontal cortex; however, EFs were significantly different in left-postcentral and right-superior temporal gyrus (P<0.05) with higher levels of variance in CUD compared to HC [F-(39,F- 43)=5.31, P<0.0001, C=0.95]. Significant differences were observed in cortical area (caudal anterior cingulate and rostral middle frontal), thickness (lateral orbitofrontal), and volume (paracentral and fusiform) between the two groups. Conclusion: Brain morphology and tDCS-induced EFs may be changed following CUD; however, differences between CUD and HCs in EFs do not always overlap with brain areas that show structural alterations. To sufficiently modulate stimulation targets, whether individuals with CUD need different stimulation doses based on tDCS target location should be checked.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 662
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transcranial direct current stimulation as a treatment for major depressive disorder
    Voineskos, Daphne
    Blumberger, Daniel M.
    LANCET, 2023, 402 (10401): : 506 - 507
  • [2] Modulation of Cortical Activity by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Affective Disorder
    Powell, Tamara Y.
    Boonstra, Tjeerd W.
    Martin, Donel M.
    Loo, Colleen K.
    Breakspear, Michael
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (06):
  • [3] Transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of alcohol, tobacco and opioid use disorder in clinical studies
    Cabuk, Begum Merve
    Guleken, Zozan
    ACTA NEUROBIOLOGIAE EXPERIMENTALIS, 2024, 84 (02) : 111 - 127
  • [4] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a potential treatment approach for cannabis use disorder
    Kearney-Ramos, Tonisha
    Haney, Margaret
    PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 109
  • [5] The efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation to prefrontal areas is related to underlying cortical morphology
    Filmer, Hannah L.
    Ehrhardt, Shane E.
    Shaw, Thomas B.
    Mattingley, Jason B.
    Dux, Paul E.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2019, 196 : 41 - 48
  • [6] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Autistic Disorder
    D'Urso, Giordano
    Ferrucci, Roberta
    Bruzzese, Dario
    Pascotto, Antonio
    Priori, Alberto
    Altamura, Alfredo Carlo
    Galderisi, Silvana
    Bravaccio, Carmela
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 76 (05) : E5 - E6
  • [7] Transcranial direct current stimulation treatment
    Eryilmaz, Gul
    Erkmen, Husnu
    Gotgcegtoz Gul, Isil
    ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 16 (02): : 138 - 142
  • [8] MINDFULNESS AND TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION FOR ALCOHOL USE DISORDER: FEASIBILITY AND OUTCOMES
    Stein, E.
    Votaw, V.
    Fratzke, V.
    Gallegos, S.
    Robinson, C.
    Brandt, E.
    Rose, R.
    Claus, E.
    Clark, V.
    Witkiewitz, K.
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 42 : 138A - 138A
  • [9] Transcranial direct current stimulation in treatment - resistance unipolar major depressive disorder
    Asadi, M.
    Mahdavi, S.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 33 : S95 - S95
  • [10] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): A Promising Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder?
    Bennabi, Djamila
    Haffen, Emmanuel
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2018, 8 (05)