Evaluating targeted COVID-19 vaccination strategies with agent-based modeling

被引:0
|
作者
Hladish, Thomas J. [1 ,2 ]
Pillai, Alexander N. [1 ]
Pearson, Carl A. B. [3 ,4 ]
Ben Toh, Kok [5 ]
Tamayo, Andrea C. [1 ]
Stoltzfus, Arlin [6 ]
Longini, Ira M. [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Biol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Emerging Pathogens Inst, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Infect Dis Epidemiol, London, England
[4] Stellenbosch Univ, South African DSI NRF Ctr Excellence Epidemiol Mod, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[5] Northwestern Univ, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL USA
[6] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Off Data & Informat, Gaithersburg, MD USA
[7] Univ Florida, Dept Biostat, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
STATES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012128
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We evaluate approaches to vaccine distribution using an agent-based model of human activity and COVID-19 transmission calibrated to detailed trends in cases, hospitalizations, deaths, seroprevalence, and vaccine breakthrough infections in Florida, USA. We compare the incremental effectiveness for four different distribution strategies at four different levels of vaccine supply, starting in late 2020 through early 2022. Our analysis indicates that the best strategy to reduce severe outcomes would be to actively target high disease-risk individuals. This was true in every scenario, although the advantage was greatest for the intermediate vaccine availability assumptions and relatively modest compared to a simple mass vaccination approach under high vaccine availability. Ring vaccination, while generally the most effective strategy for reducing infections, ultimately proved least effective at preventing deaths. We also consider using age group as a practical surrogate measure for actual disease-risk targeting; this approach also outperforms both simple mass distribution and ring vaccination. We find that quantitative effectiveness of a strategy depends on whether effectiveness is assessed after the alpha, delta, or omicron wave. However, these differences in absolute benefit for the strategies do not change the ranking of their performance at preventing severe outcomes across vaccine availability assumptions. We use our agent-based model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to evaluate alternative vaccine distribution strategies over a range of vaccine supply scenarios. We find that strategies targeting transmission (e.g., ring vaccination) perform best in preventing infections, but targeting disease risk prevents more instances of severe outcomes. Specifically, strategies based on age, or age and comorbidities-which do not require contact tracing-resulted in the fewest hospitalizations in our model. These strategy rankings held true across all vaccine supply scenarios and were robust to the introduction of SARS-CoV-2 variants. While the quantitative results cannot be directly applied to other settings (as we used a synthetic population calibrated to the State of Florida), the rankings of strategies should be more generalizable.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Equation-Based Modeling vs. Agent-Based Modeling with Applications to the Spread of COVID-19 Outbreak
    Kasereka, Selain K.
    Zohinga, Glody N.
    Kiketa, Vogel M.
    Ngoie, Ruffin-Benoit M.
    Mputu, Eddy K.
    Kasoro, Nathanael M.
    Kyandoghere, Kyamakya
    MATHEMATICS, 2023, 11 (01)
  • [42] The impact of prioritisation and dosing intervals on the effects of COVID-19 vaccination in Europe: an agent-based cohort model
    Catala, Marti
    Li, Xintong
    Prats, Clara
    Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [43] The impact of prioritisation and dosing intervals on the effects of COVID-19 vaccination in Europe: an agent-based cohort model
    Martí Català
    Xintong Li
    Clara Prats
    Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [44] COVID-19 Spatial Diffusion: A Markovian Agent-Based Model
    Gribaudo, Marco
    Iacono, Mauro
    Manini, Daniele
    MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (05) : 1 - 12
  • [45] Covasim: An agent-based model of COVID-19 dynamics and interventions
    Kerr, Cliff C.
    Stuart, Robyn M.
    Mistry, Dina
    Abeysuriya, Romesh G.
    Rosenfeld, Katherine
    Hart, Gregory R.
    Nunez, Rafael C.
    Cohen, Jamie A.
    Selvaraj, Prashanth
    Hagedorn, Brittany
    George, Lauren
    Jastrzebski, Michal
    Izzo, Amanda S.
    Fowler, Greer
    Palmer, Anna
    Delport, Dominic
    Scott, Nick
    Kelly, Sherrie L.
    Bennette, Caroline S.
    Wagner, Bradley G.
    Chang, Stewart T.
    Oron, Assaf P.
    Wenger, Edward A.
    Panovska-Griffiths, Jasmina
    Famulare, Michael
    Klein, Daniel J.
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2021, 17 (07)
  • [46] FPGA-accelerated Agent-Based Simulation for COVID-19
    Fu, Lei
    Guo, Ce
    Luk, Wayne
    2021 IEEE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (AICAS), 2021,
  • [47] Mitigating the Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation Using Agent-Based Modeling and Delays in Information Diffusion
    Alassad, Mustafa
    Agarwal, Nitin
    SOCIAL NETWORKS ANALYSIS AND MINING, ASONAM 2024, PT II, 2025, 15212 : 264 - 273
  • [48] Agent-based Modeling as a Tool for Predicting the Spatial-temporal Diffusion of the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Olszewski, R.
    Palka, P.
    Wendland, A.
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEE IEEM21), 2021, : 11 - 15
  • [49] COVID-19 transmission in a resource dependent community with heterogeneous populations: An agent-based modeling approach
    Wood, Aaron D.
    Berry, Kevin
    ECONOMICS & HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2024, 52
  • [50] Agent-Based Modeling of COVID-19 Transmission: A Case Study of Housing Densities in Sankalitnagar, Ahmedabad
    French, Molly
    Patel, Amit
    Qureshi, Abid
    Saxena, Deepak
    Sengupta, Raja
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2024, 13 (06)