Evaluating targeted COVID-19 vaccination strategies with agent-based modeling

被引:0
|
作者
Hladish, Thomas J. [1 ,2 ]
Pillai, Alexander N. [1 ]
Pearson, Carl A. B. [3 ,4 ]
Ben Toh, Kok [5 ]
Tamayo, Andrea C. [1 ]
Stoltzfus, Arlin [6 ]
Longini, Ira M. [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Biol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Emerging Pathogens Inst, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Infect Dis Epidemiol, London, England
[4] Stellenbosch Univ, South African DSI NRF Ctr Excellence Epidemiol Mod, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[5] Northwestern Univ, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL USA
[6] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Off Data & Informat, Gaithersburg, MD USA
[7] Univ Florida, Dept Biostat, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
STATES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012128
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We evaluate approaches to vaccine distribution using an agent-based model of human activity and COVID-19 transmission calibrated to detailed trends in cases, hospitalizations, deaths, seroprevalence, and vaccine breakthrough infections in Florida, USA. We compare the incremental effectiveness for four different distribution strategies at four different levels of vaccine supply, starting in late 2020 through early 2022. Our analysis indicates that the best strategy to reduce severe outcomes would be to actively target high disease-risk individuals. This was true in every scenario, although the advantage was greatest for the intermediate vaccine availability assumptions and relatively modest compared to a simple mass vaccination approach under high vaccine availability. Ring vaccination, while generally the most effective strategy for reducing infections, ultimately proved least effective at preventing deaths. We also consider using age group as a practical surrogate measure for actual disease-risk targeting; this approach also outperforms both simple mass distribution and ring vaccination. We find that quantitative effectiveness of a strategy depends on whether effectiveness is assessed after the alpha, delta, or omicron wave. However, these differences in absolute benefit for the strategies do not change the ranking of their performance at preventing severe outcomes across vaccine availability assumptions. We use our agent-based model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to evaluate alternative vaccine distribution strategies over a range of vaccine supply scenarios. We find that strategies targeting transmission (e.g., ring vaccination) perform best in preventing infections, but targeting disease risk prevents more instances of severe outcomes. Specifically, strategies based on age, or age and comorbidities-which do not require contact tracing-resulted in the fewest hospitalizations in our model. These strategy rankings held true across all vaccine supply scenarios and were robust to the introduction of SARS-CoV-2 variants. While the quantitative results cannot be directly applied to other settings (as we used a synthetic population calibrated to the State of Florida), the rankings of strategies should be more generalizable.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Testing Different COVID-19 Vaccination Strategies Using an Agent-Based Modeling Approach
    Trad F.
    El Falou S.
    SN Computer Science, 3 (4)
  • [2] Targeted COVID-19 Vaccination (TAV-COVID) Considering Limited Vaccination Capacities-An Agent-Based Modeling Evaluation
    Jahn, Beate
    Sroczynski, Gaby
    Bicher, Martin
    Rippinger, Claire
    Muehlberger, Nikolai
    Santamaria, Julia
    Urach, Christoph
    Schomaker, Michael
    Stojkov, Igor
    Schmid, Daniela
    Weiss, Guenter
    Wiedermann, Ursula
    Redlberger-Fritz, Monika
    Druml, Christiane
    Kretzschmar, Mirjam
    Paulke-Korinek, Maria
    Ostermann, Herwig
    Czasch, Caroline
    Endel, Gottfried
    Bock, Wolfgang
    Popper, Nikolas
    Siebert, Uwe
    VACCINES, 2021, 9 (05)
  • [3] Agent-based model for COVID-19: The impact of social distancing and vaccination strategies
    de Andrade, Bruno S. S.
    Espindola, Aquino L. L.
    Faria Junior, Aydamari
    Penna, Thadeu J. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS C, 2023, 34 (10):
  • [4] Agent-based modeling of the COVID-19 pandemic in Florida
    Pillai, Alexander N.
    Ben Toh, Kok
    Perdomo, Dianela
    Bhargava, Sanjana
    Stoltzfus, Arlin
    Longini Jr, Ira M.
    Pearson, Carl A. B.
    Hladish, Thomas J.
    EPIDEMICS, 2024, 47
  • [5] An Agent-Based Modeling of COVID-19: Validation, Analysis, and Recommendations
    Shamil, Md. Salman
    Farheen, Farhanaz
    Ibtehaz, Nabil
    Khan, Irtesam Mahmud
    Rahman, M. Sohel
    COGNITIVE COMPUTATION, 2024, 16 (04) : 1723 - 1734
  • [6] Agent-based epidemiological modeling of COVID-19 in localized environments
    Ciunkiewicz, P.
    Brooke, W.
    Rogers, M.
    Yanushkevich, S.
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2022, 144
  • [7] COVID-19 Epidemic Modeling Advantages of an Agent-Based Approach
    Makarov, Valerii L.
    Bakhtizin, Al'bert R.
    Sushko, Elena D.
    Ageeva, Alina F.
    ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CHANGES-FACTS TRENDS FORECAST, 2020, 13 (04) : 58 - 73
  • [8] Agent-Based Modeling of COVID-19 Transmission in Philippine Classrooms
    Macalinao, Rojhun O.
    Malaguit, Jcob C.
    Lutero, Destiny S.
    FRONTIERS IN APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS, 2022, 8
  • [9] An Agent-Based Model of COVID-19
    Wolfram, Christopher
    COMPLEX SYSTEMS, 2020, 29 (01): : 87 - 105
  • [10] Agent-based modelling of reactive vaccination of workplaces and schools against COVID-19
    Faucher, Benjamin
    Assab, Rania
    Roux, Jonathan
    Levy-Bruhl, Daniel
    Kiem, Cecile Tran
    Cauchemez, Simon
    Zanetti, Laura
    Colizza, Vittoria
    Boelle, Pierre-Yves
    Poletto, Chiara
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)