Standardizing male pelvic anatomy teaching using a clinical enrichment video

被引:1
|
作者
MacDonald, Landan [1 ]
Ory, Jesse [1 ]
Pulakunta, Thejodhar [2 ]
MacLellan, Dawn L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Urol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Neurosci, Halifax, NS, Canada
来源
关键词
MEDICAL-STUDENTS; EDUCATION; USAGE;
D O I
10.5489/cuaj.8712
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Evolving trends in medical education and modern curricular changes have reduced the amount of time and resources allocated for anatomy education. As the amount of dedicated anatomy education time decreases, more self-directed learning is required. Cadaveric dissection and didactic teaching have been supplemented with multimedia, clinical anatomy, and imaging for over 20 years, with mixed results. Specifically, the use of video- based anatomy teaching increases medical learning, if done methodically. METHODS: A 20-minute video was produced highlighting surgical anatomy using the following operative cases: perineal anatomy (artificial urinary sphincter case), inguinal and testicular anatomy (scrotal orchidopexy for acute testicular torsion), prostate anatomy (robotic radical prostatectomy), and bladder anatomy (endoscopy). The annotated video was shown to first-year medical students. Pre- and post-video multiple choice question quizzes were given to the students. Once submitted, the students completed a survey. RESULTS: Overall, 191 first-year medical students participated in our study. Average scores were similar between each quiz (50 +/- 16% vs. 49 +/- 17%) and there was no statistically significant change. Seventy-seven percent of participants felt the video improved their knowledge of urologic anatomy and 83% agreed the video should be shown to future classes. Sixty percent of participants felt the video solidified their anatomy knowledge, 78% felt the video was stimulating and entertaining, and 43% of the students felt the video increased their interest in pursuing urology as a career choice. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomy teaching can be supplemented using surgical videos, especially in a time when in-person anatomy teaching is limited. Further study is required to determine whether this teaching modality improves long-term anatomy knowledge retention.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 279
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CLINICAL RADIOGRAPHS OF THE CADAVER AS A TEACHING AID IN ANATOMY
    PANTOJA, E
    NAGY, F
    ZAMBERNARD, J
    RADIOLOGY, 1985, 155 (01) : 28 - 28
  • [32] Learning pelvic examination with clinical teaching associates
    Xu, Bo
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 42 (04) : 441 - 441
  • [33] Geneva road map for clinical anatomy teaching
    Fasel, J. H. D.
    JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 2016, 229 (05) : 710 - 710
  • [34] Teaching of clinical anatomy in rheumatology: a review of methodologies
    Karina D. Torralba
    Pablo Villaseñor-Ovies
    Christine M. Evelyn
    R. Michelle Koolaee
    Robert A. Kalish
    Clinical Rheumatology, 2015, 34 : 1157 - 1163
  • [35] How can clinical anatomy teaching be rationalized?
    Sinha, Sankar
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 84 (11) : 805 - 806
  • [36] Teaching of clinical anatomy in rheumatology: a review of methodologies
    Torralba, Karina D.
    Villasenor-Ovies, Pablo
    Evelyn, Christine M.
    Koolaee, R. Michelle
    Kalish, Robert A.
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2015, 34 (07) : 1157 - 1163
  • [37] Professional Storytelling in Clinical Dental Anatomy Teaching
    Kieser, Jules
    Livingstone, Vicki
    Meldrum, Alison
    ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2008, 1 (02) : 84 - 89
  • [38] Body Painting as a Tool in Clinical Anatomy Teaching
    McMenamin, Paul G.
    ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2008, 1 (04) : 139 - 144
  • [39] Automatic segmentation of male pelvic anatomy on computed tomography images: a comparison with multiple observers in the context of a multicentre clinical trial
    Geraghty, John P.
    Grogan, Garry
    Ebert, Martin A.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8
  • [40] Automatic segmentation of male pelvic anatomy on computed tomography images: a comparison with multiple observers in the context of a multicentre clinical trial
    John P Geraghty
    Garry Grogan
    Martin A Ebert
    Radiation Oncology, 8