Clarifying Mendelian vs non-Mendelian inheritance

被引:0
|
作者
Strome, Susan [1 ]
Bhalla, Needhi [1 ]
Kamakaka, Rohinton [1 ]
Sharma, Upasna [1 ]
Sullivan, William [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Mol Cell & Dev Biol, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
genetics; Mendel's laws; Mendelian inheritance; genotypic and phenotypic ratios; MATERNAL INHERITANCE; SEGREGATION; COMPLEX;
D O I
10.1093/genetics/iyae078
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Gregor Mendel developed the principles of segregation and independent assortment in the mid-1800s based on his detailed analysis of several traits in pea plants. Those principles, now called Mendel's laws, in fact, explain the behavior of genes and alleles during meiosis and are now understood to underlie "Mendelian inheritance" of a wide range of traits and diseases across organisms. When asked to give examples of inheritance that do NOT follow Mendel's laws, in other words, examples of non-Mendelian inheritance, students sometimes list incomplete dominance, codominance, multiple alleles, sex-linked traits, and multigene traits and cite as their sources the Khan Academy, Wikipedia, and other online sites. Against this background, the goals of this Perspective are to (1) explain to students, healthcare workers, and other stakeholders why the examples above, in fact, display Mendelian inheritance, as they obey Mendel's laws of segregation and independent assortment, even though they do not produce classic Mendelian phenotypic ratios and (2) urge individuals with an intimate knowledge of genetic principles to monitor the accuracy of learning resources and work with us and those resources to correct information that is misleading.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条