Pulmonary vein reconnection and repeat ablation characteristics following cryoballoon-compared to radiofrequency-based pulmonary vein isolation

被引:3
|
作者
Obergassel, J. [1 ,2 ]
Nies, M. [1 ,2 ]
Taraba, S. [1 ]
Rottner, L. [1 ]
Lemoine, M. D. [1 ]
My, I. [1 ]
Moser, F. [1 ]
Riess, J. L. [1 ,2 ]
Schenker, N. [1 ]
Dinshaw, L. [1 ]
Schleberger, R. [1 ]
Reissmann, B. [1 ]
Meyer, C. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Willems, S. [2 ,5 ]
Rillig, A. [1 ]
Kirchhof, P. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Metzner, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Univ Heart & Vasc Ctr Hamburg, Dept Cardiol, Martinistr 52, D-20253 Hamburg, Germany
[2] German Ctr Cardiovasc Res DZHK, Partner Site Hamburg Kiel Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany
[3] EVK Dusseldorf, Cardiac Neuro & Electrophysiol Res Consortium, Dept Cardiol Angiol & Intens Care, cNEP, Dusseldorf, Germany
[4] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Inst Neural & Sensory Physiol, cNEP, Med Fac,Cardiac Neuro & Electrophysiol Res Consort, Dusseldorf, Germany
[5] Asklepios Klin St Georg, Dept Cardiol, Hamburg, Germany
[6] Univ Birmingham, Inst Cardiovasc Sci, Birmingham, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cryoballoon ablation; energy; pulmonary vein reconnection; radiofrequency ablation; reisolation; repeat ablation; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; 2ND-GENERATION CRYOBALLOON; CATHETER ABLATION; TACHYCARDIA;
D O I
10.1111/jce.16343
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Despite advances in efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after PVI remains common. PV-reconnection is the main finding during repeat PVI procedures performed to treat recurrent AF. Objective: To analyze pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection patterns during repeat ablation procedures in a large cohort of consecutive patients undergoing radio frequency or cryoballoon-based PVI. Methods: Retrospective analysis of PV-reconnection patterns and analysis of re-ablation strategies in consecutive index RF- and CB-based PVI and their respective re-ablation procedures during concomitant usage of both energy sources at a single high-volume center in Germany. Results: A total of 610 first (06/2015-10/2022) and 133 s (01/2016-11/2022) repeat ablation procedures after 363 (60%) RF- and 247 (40%) CB-based index PVIs between 01/2015 and 12/2021 were analyzed. PV-reconnection was found in 509/610 (83%) patients at first and 74/133 (56%) patients at second repeat procedure. 465 of 968 (48%) initially via CB isolated PVs were reconnected at first re-ablation but 796 of 1422 initially RF-isolated PV (56%) were reconnected (OR: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.62-0.86]; p < .001). This was driven by fewer reconnections of the left PVs (LSPV: OR: 0.60 [95% CI: 0.42-0.86]; p = .005 and LSPV: 0.67 [0.47-0.95]; p = .026). PV-reconnection was more likely after longer, RF-based index PVI and in older females. Repeat procedures were shorter after CB-compared to after RF-PVI. Conclusions: Reconnection remains the most common reason for repeat AF ablation procedures after PVI. Our data suggest to preferentially use of the cryoballoon during index PVI, especially in older women.
引用
收藏
页码:1766 / 1778
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of pulmonary vein reconnection patterns after multielectrode phased radiofrequency- and cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation
    Marcus Wieczorek
    Kiarash Sassani
    Reinhard Hoeltgen
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 20
  • [42] Arrhythmia-free survival and pulmonary vein reconnection patterns after second-generation cryoballoon and contact-force radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation
    Thomas J. Buist
    Ahmet Adiyaman
    Jaap Jan J. Smit
    Anand R. Ramdat Misier
    Arif Elvan
    Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2018, 107 : 498 - 506
  • [43] Arrhythmia-free survival and pulmonary vein reconnection patterns after second-generation cryoballoon and contact-force radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation
    Buist, Thomas J.
    Adiyaman, Ahmet
    Smit, Jaap Jan J.
    Misier, Anand R. Ramdat
    Elvan, Arif
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 107 (06) : 498 - 506
  • [44] Is Cryoballoon Ablation Preferable to Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by Pulmonary Vein Isolation? A Meta-Analysis
    Xu, Junxia
    Huang, Yingqun
    Cai, Hongbin
    Qi, Yue
    Jia, Nan
    Shen, Weifeng
    Lin, Jinxiu
    Peng, Feng
    Niu, Wenquan
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02):
  • [45] Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation without pulmonary venography
    Haqqani, Haris M.
    Mengel, Caleb
    Betts, John
    Ingram, Rensche
    Lee, Xiang Wen
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (03) : 774 - 775
  • [46] Characterization of radiofrequency redo procedures for recurrence of atrial fibrillation following cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation
    Godin, B.
    Gardey, K.
    Savoure, A.
    Anselme, F.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 33 : 986 - 986
  • [47] Pulmonary Hemorrhage After Cryoballoon Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
    Marti-Almor, Julio
    Jauregui-Abularach, Miguel E.
    Benito, Begona
    Valles, Ermengol
    Bazan, Victor
    Sanchez-Font, Albert
    Vollmer, Ivan
    Altaba, Carmen
    Guijo, Miguel A.
    Hervas, Manel
    Bruguera-Cortada, Jordi
    CHEST, 2014, 145 (01) : 156 - 157
  • [48] Pulmonary vein isolation using laser balloon as compared to standard radiofrequency catheter ablation
    Koopman, Pieter
    Vanhentenrijk, Simon
    Schurmans, Joris
    Dining, Dagmara
    Vijgen, Johan
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2017, 72 (01) : 89 - 90
  • [49] Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using Laser Balloon as Compared to Standard Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation
    Koopman, Pieter
    Vanhentenrijk, Simon
    Schurmans, Joris
    Dilling, Dagmara
    Vijgen, Johan
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 28 (05) : 600 - 601
  • [50] Characterization of atrial flutter after pulmonary vein isolation by cryoballoon ablation
    Jayson R. Baman
    Rachel M. Kaplan
    Celso L. Diaz
    Graham Peigh
    Aakash A. Bavishi
    Amar Trivedi
    Jeremiah Wasserlauf
    Alexandru B. Chicos
    Rishi Arora
    Susan Kim
    Albert Lin
    Nishant Verma
    Bradley P. Knight
    Rod S. Passman
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2020, 57 : 233 - 240