Ultra-Hypofractionated Prostate Radiotherapy With Online Adaptive Technique: A Case Report

被引:2
|
作者
Yoganathan, S. A. [1 ]
Riyas, Mohamed [1 ]
Sukumaran, Renilmon [1 ]
Hammoud, Rabih [1 ]
Al-Hammadi, Noora [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Med Corp, Radiat Oncol, Doha, Qatar
关键词
cyberknife; ethos; adaptive; online; ultra-hypofractionated; prostate; CANCER;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.64101
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF RT) is revolutionizing the treatment approach for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. This study reports the planning process of UHF RT utilizing the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based online adaptive radiotherapy (OART) treatment with the Ethos system, focusing on a comparative analysis between OART and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) plans. We also assessed the pre-planning capabilities of the Ethos system against the CyberKnife (CK) (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA) system. A 66-year-old patient, diagnosed with prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma confirmed via biopsy and presenting with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, underwent UHF OART treatment using the Ethos system. The planning encompassed delineating the gross target volume (GTV) as the prostate, while the clinical target volume (CTV) comprised the prostate and proximal seminal vesicle. The planning target volume (PTV) was derived from the CTV with a 5 mm external margin except for a 3 mm posterior margin. A simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique was employed, delivering 40 Gy in five fractions (8 Gy per fraction) to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and 36.25 Gy in five fractions (7.25 Gy per fraction) to the remaining part of the planning target volume (PTV), with treatments scheduled biweekly. We compared OART and IGRT plans and conducted a comparative analysis between Ethos planning and the CK system for pre-planning assessment. When comparing Ethos planning and CK plans, Ethos demonstrated slightly better target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. However, CK plans showed superior containment of low-dose spillage, particularly at 50% and 25% iso-doses, due to non-coplanar beam arrangements. Our results demonstrated that OART plans yielded superior target coverage and improved OAR sparing compared to IGRT plans. Notably, the entire OART process, from planning to delivery, was accomplished within 27 minutes. The Ethos OART system's ability to adapt to daily anatomical changes, efficient workflow, and superior OAR-sparing capabilities make it a promising option for prostate cancer treatment using UHF RT.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ultra-hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy with integrated boost for early breast cancer
    Montero, A.
    Ciervide, R.
    Garcia-Aranda, M.
    Alvarez, B.
    Prado, A.
    Chen-Zhao, X.
    Alonso, R.
    Lopez, M.
    Sanchez, E.
    Hernando, O.
    Valero, J.
    Nunez, M.
    Izquierdo, M.
    Rossi, K.
    Canadillas, C.
    Fernandez-Leton, P.
    Rubio, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S942 - S943
  • [42] A dosimetric comparison of ultra-hypofractionated passively scattered proton radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Kole, Thomas P.
    Nichols, R. Charles
    Lei, Song
    Wu, Binbin
    Huh, Soon N.
    Morris, Christopher G.
    Lee, Sang
    Tong, Michael
    Mendenhall, Nancy P.
    Dritschilo, Anatoly
    Collins, Sean P.
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2015, 54 (06) : 825 - 831
  • [43] Ultra-hypofractionated Breast Radiotherapy in patients receiving Systemic Treatment: A risky combination?
    Mezghani, M.
    Ben Rejeb, M.
    Hamdoun, A.
    Bouguerra, G.
    Haddad, R.
    Ghorbal, L.
    Kochbati, L.
    BREAST, 2025, 80
  • [44] The efficacy and tolerability of ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy in low-intermediate risk prostate cancer patients: single center experience
    Dincer, Selvi
    Uysal, Emre
    Berber, Tanju
    Akboru, Mustafa Halil
    AGING MALE, 2021, 24 (01): : 50 - 57
  • [45] Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherpy in elderly prostate cancer patients: a single center experience
    Repetti, Ilaria
    Corrao, Giulia
    Marvaso, Giulia
    Lorubbio, Chiara
    Mastroleo, Federico
    Vincini, Maria Giulia
    Zaffaroni, Mattia
    Fodor, Cristiana
    Pierini, Vanessa
    Mazzola, Giovanni Carlo
    Pedone, Cristiana
    Zerini, Dario
    Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S2483 - S2485
  • [46] Are ultra-hypofractionated prostate treatments worse in some patients? - an in-silico study
    Claassen, F.
    Coen, V.
    Jacobs, I.
    Harthoorn, T.
    De Marco, I.
    Mous-Van der Wegen, B.
    Van den Heuvel, F.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S831 - S832
  • [47] Dosimetric Features of Ultra-Hypofractionated Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Gao, Robert W.
    Ma, Jiasen
    Pisansky, Thomas M.
    Kruse, Jon J.
    Stish, Bradley J.
    Kowalchuk, Roman O.
    McMenomy, Brendan P.
    Waddle, Mark R.
    Phillips, Ryan M.
    Choo, Richard
    Davis, Brian J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2024, 12
  • [48] Acute toxicity outcomes in Egyptian early-stage breast cancer: ultra-hypofractionated versus hypofractionated radiotherapy
    Ahmed Magdy
    Emad Sadaka
    Rasha Abd el Ghani
    Taha Ahmed
    Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 37 (1)
  • [49] Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy for low- and intermediate risk prostate cancer: High-dose-rate brachytherapy vs stereotactic ablative radiotherapy
    Tsang, Yat Man
    Tharmalingam, Hannah
    Belessiotis-Richards, Katherine
    Armstrong, Shreya
    Ostler, Peter
    Hughes, Robert
    Alonzi, Roberto
    Hoskin, Peter J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 158 : 184 - 190
  • [50] Cost-effectiveness analysis of ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for intermediate- to high-risk localized prostate cancer
    He, Jiaoxue
    Wang, Qingfeng
    Hu, Qiancheng
    Li, Changlin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 12