Ultra-Hypofractionated Prostate Radiotherapy With Online Adaptive Technique: A Case Report

被引:2
|
作者
Yoganathan, S. A. [1 ]
Riyas, Mohamed [1 ]
Sukumaran, Renilmon [1 ]
Hammoud, Rabih [1 ]
Al-Hammadi, Noora [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Med Corp, Radiat Oncol, Doha, Qatar
关键词
cyberknife; ethos; adaptive; online; ultra-hypofractionated; prostate; CANCER;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.64101
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF RT) is revolutionizing the treatment approach for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. This study reports the planning process of UHF RT utilizing the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based online adaptive radiotherapy (OART) treatment with the Ethos system, focusing on a comparative analysis between OART and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) plans. We also assessed the pre-planning capabilities of the Ethos system against the CyberKnife (CK) (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA) system. A 66-year-old patient, diagnosed with prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma confirmed via biopsy and presenting with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, underwent UHF OART treatment using the Ethos system. The planning encompassed delineating the gross target volume (GTV) as the prostate, while the clinical target volume (CTV) comprised the prostate and proximal seminal vesicle. The planning target volume (PTV) was derived from the CTV with a 5 mm external margin except for a 3 mm posterior margin. A simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique was employed, delivering 40 Gy in five fractions (8 Gy per fraction) to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and 36.25 Gy in five fractions (7.25 Gy per fraction) to the remaining part of the planning target volume (PTV), with treatments scheduled biweekly. We compared OART and IGRT plans and conducted a comparative analysis between Ethos planning and the CK system for pre-planning assessment. When comparing Ethos planning and CK plans, Ethos demonstrated slightly better target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. However, CK plans showed superior containment of low-dose spillage, particularly at 50% and 25% iso-doses, due to non-coplanar beam arrangements. Our results demonstrated that OART plans yielded superior target coverage and improved OAR sparing compared to IGRT plans. Notably, the entire OART process, from planning to delivery, was accomplished within 27 minutes. The Ethos OART system's ability to adapt to daily anatomical changes, efficient workflow, and superior OAR-sparing capabilities make it a promising option for prostate cancer treatment using UHF RT.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Weekly ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy in localised prostate cancer
    Sundahl, Nora
    Brand, Douglas
    Parker, Chris
    Dearnaley, David
    Tree, Alison
    Pathmanathan, Angela
    Suh, Yae-eun
    Van As, Nicholas
    Eeles, Rosalind
    Khoo, Vincent
    Huddart, Robert
    Murray, Julia
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 47
  • [2] Intrafraction Prostate Motion Management for Ultra-Hypofractionated Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer
    Oehler, Christoph
    Roehner, Nina
    Sumila, Marcin
    Curschmann, Juergen
    Storelli, Fabrizio
    Zwahlen, Daniel Rudolf
    Schneider, Uwe
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (09) : 6314 - 6324
  • [3] Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy in High risk localised prostate cancer
    Colom Pla, Claudia
    Navarro Aznar, Victoria
    Garcia Aguilera, Cristina
    Cerrolaza Pascual, Maria
    Lanuza Carnicer, Alberto
    Galan Garcia, Ana
    Mendez Villamon, Agustina
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S2568 - S2569
  • [4] Diagnostic image-based treatment planning for online adaptive ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer radiotherapy with MR-Linac
    Xu, Yuan
    Lu, Ningning
    Li, Qiao
    Men, Kuo
    Zhao, Xinming
    Dai, Jianrong
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025,
  • [5] Treatment outcomes of postoperative ultra-hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy in prostate cancer
    Ozyigit, Gokhan
    Onal, Cem
    Esen, Caglayan Selenge Beduk
    Tilki, Burak
    Hurmuz, Pervin
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 41 (05) : 252.e1 - 252.e8
  • [6] Treatment Outcomes of Postoperative Ultra-Hypofractionated Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer
    Ozyigit, G.
    Onal, C.
    Hurmuz, P.
    Esen, S. Beduk
    Tilki, B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : E237 - E238
  • [7] Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: Results, limits and prospects
    Graff, P.
    Crehange, G.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2021, 25 (6-7): : 684 - 691
  • [8] Machine learning-based models of toxicity in prostate cancer ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy
    Pepa, M.
    Zaffaroni, M.
    Volpe, S.
    Marvaso, G.
    Isaksson, J. L.
    Barzaghi, S.
    Benigni, F.
    Callegari, M.
    Gismundi, A.
    La Fauci, F. M.
    Corrao, G.
    Augugliaro, M.
    Cattani, F.
    Baroni, G.
    De Momi, E.
    Orecchia, R.
    Jereczek-Fossa, B. A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S1522 - S1523
  • [9] The prognostic value of PI-RADS score in ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Miszczyk, M.
    Magrowski, L.
    Rembak-Szynkiewicz, J.
    Rajwa, P.
    Namysl-Kaletka, A.
    Paradysz, A.
    Napieralska, A.
    Wozniak, G.
    Glowacki, G.
    Stapor-Fudzinska, M.
    Miszczyk, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S1117 - S1118
  • [10] Daily Adaptive Replanning with Dose Accumulation for Prostate Ultra-Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Using Machine Learning Automated Planning On CBCT
    Golshan, M.
    Khalifa, A.
    Winter, J.
    Xie, J.
    McIntosh, C.
    Purdie, T.
    Malkov, V.
    Tadic, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E465 - E466