Testing a Brief Quitline Intervention for Tobacco Cannabis Co-Users: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

被引:1
|
作者
Carpenter, Kelly M. [1 ]
Walker, Denise D. [2 ]
Mullis, Kristina [1 ]
Berlin, Helena M. [1 ]
Short, Etta [3 ]
Javitz, Harold S.
Carlini, Beatriz H. [2 ]
机构
[1] RVO Hlth, Ctr Wellbeing Res, 1101 Red Ventures Dr, Ft Mill, SC 29707 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA USA
[3] RVO Hlth, Ft Mills, SC USA
来源
TOBACCO USE INSIGHTS | 2024年 / 17卷
关键词
Tobacco; cessation; quitlines; cannabis; coaching; interventions; PRIMARY-CARE; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1177/1179173X241261302
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Tobacco cannabis co-use is common and becoming more prevalent. Frequent and heavy users of cannabis may struggle to quit smoking. Quitlines offer free cessation treatment in the United States and 25% of quitline callers may also be cannabis users. The present paper describes a randomized pilot study of a tailored intervention for cannabis and cigarette co-users. The intervention combines the quitline smoking cessation treatment with a motivational enhancement therapy-based cannabis intervention. Methods: The randomized pilot study was conducted within four state-funded quitlines with quitline coaches as interventionists. 102 quitline callers who were cannabis and cigarette co-users were randomized to receive treatment as usual (TAU) or the new Quitline Check-Up (QLCU) intervention. Outcomes were collected 90 days post-randomization. Primary outcomes included feasibility and acceptability of delivering the QLCU in the quitline setting. Secondary outcomes included 7-day point prevalence tobacco abstinence, past 30-day cannabis use, and Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test scores.Results: Study participants were heavy cannabis users, averaging 25 days of use in the past 30; nearly 70% used at a level considered hazardous. Fidelity ratings indicated coaches were successful at delivering the intervention. Treatment engagement was high for both groups (TAU m = 3.4 calls; QLCU m = 3.6 calls) as was treatment satisfaction. Intent-to-treat quit rates (with survey non-responders classified as smokers) were 28.6% for the TAU control group and 24.5% for the QLCU group (P = .45). Discussion: Hazardous cannabis use rates were high in this sample of tobacco cannabis co-users calling quitlines to quit smoking. The intervention for co-users was acceptable and feasible to deliver. No improvements in tobacco cessation outcomes were observed. Pragmatic intervention development within a real-world clinical setting can streamline the intervention development process. More research is needed on tobacco cannabis co-users and who can benefit from a tailored intervention. Registered: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04737772, February 4, 2021.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Promoting assertiveness in youth in foster care: Pilot testing a brief intervention in a randomized trial
    Blocker, Madeline S.
    Noell, George H.
    Clark, Kelly N.
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2021, 126
  • [32] A Brief Psychological Intervention for Chronic Pain in Primary Care: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Miller-Matero, Lisa R.
    Hecht, Leah M.
    Miller, Mary Kate
    Autio, Kirsti
    Pester, Bethany D.
    Tobin, Erin T.
    Patel, Shivali
    Braciszewski, Jordan M.
    Maye, Melissa
    Ahmedani, Brian K.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (07) : 1603 - 1611
  • [33] Tobacco cessation mobile app intervention (Just Kwit! study): protocol for a pilot randomized controlled pragmatic trial
    Chu, Kar-Hai
    Escobar-Viera, Cesar G.
    Matheny, Sara J.
    Davis, Esa M.
    Primack, Brian A.
    TRIALS, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [34] Tobacco cessation mobile app intervention (Just Kwit! study): protocol for a pilot randomized controlled pragmatic trial
    Kar-Hai Chu
    César G. Escobar-Viera
    Sara J. Matheny
    Esa M. Davis
    Brian A. Primack
    Trials, 20
  • [35] On-Line Personalized Feedback Intervention for Negative Affect an Cannabis: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Buckner, Julia D.
    Zvolensky, Michael J.
    Lewis, Elizabeth M.
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 28 (02) : 143 - 149
  • [36] The role of tobacco smoking in the efficacy of brief alcohol intervention: Results from a randomized controlled trial
    Krolo, Filipa
    Baumann, Sophie
    Tiede, Anika
    Krause, Kristian
    Meyer, Christian
    Bischof, Gallus
    John, Ulrich
    Gaertner, Beate
    Freyer-Adam, Jennis
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2022, 45 (SUPPL 3) : 44 - 44
  • [37] Randomized controlled trial of bottle weaning intervention: A pilot study
    Kahn, Richard
    Bonuck, Karen
    Trombley, Michelle
    CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 2007, 46 (02) : 163 - 174
  • [38] A cluster randomized controlled trial of a brief tobacco cessation intervention for low-income communities in India: study protocol
    Sarkar, Bidyut K.
    Shahab, Lion
    Arora, Monika
    Lorencatto, Fabiana
    Reddy, K. Srinath
    West, Robert
    ADDICTION, 2014, 109 (03) : 371 - 378
  • [39] The Role of Tobacco Smoking in the Efficacy of Brief Alcohol Intervention: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Krolo, Filipa
    Baumann, Sophie
    Tiede, Anika
    Bischof, Gallus
    Krause, Kristian
    Meyer, Christian
    John, Ulrich
    Gaertner, Beate
    Freyer-Adam, Jennis
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (10)
  • [40] Brief intervention for regular ecstasy (MDMA) users: Pilot randomized trial of a Check-up model
    Martin, Greg
    Copeland, Jan
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE, 2010, 15 (02) : 131 - 142