Neurophysiological markers of printed word processing and reading fluency in adolescence

被引:2
|
作者
Markevich, Maksim [1 ]
Rebreikina, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Logvinenko, Tatiana [1 ,4 ]
Sysoeva, Olga [1 ,2 ]
Grigorenko, Elena L. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sirius Univ Sci & Technol, Ctr Cognit Sci, Sirius 354340, Krasnodar, Russia
[2] RAS, Inst Higher Nervous Act & Neurophysiol, Lab Human Higher Nervous Act, Moscow, Russia
[3] Univ Houston, Dept Psychol, 126 Heyne Bldg, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[4] Ludwig Maximilian Univ Munich, Univ Hosp, Munich, Germany
关键词
ERP; reading fluency; P100; N170; adolescence; TIME-COURSE; CHILDREN; ERP; DYSLEXIA; RECOGNITION; N1; SENSITIVITY; CHILDHOOD; FREQUENCY; ATTENTION;
D O I
10.1080/23273798.2024.2375217
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Reading fluency is one of key facets of reading performance. At the neurophysiological level, as reading skills improve, latencies of P100 and N170 shorten, and the functional role of these ERPs components is expanding. While in primary schoolchildren, only orthographic N170 effects are observed, lexical and grammatical N170 effects are traceable in adulthood. However, previous studies neglect the adolescent sample. The goal of this study was to determine whether adolescents exhibit lexical and grammatical N170 effects and explore the link between reading fluency and P100 and N170 components. We assessed 32 adolescents in the context of a grammaticality judgment ERP experiment and estimated reading fluency. We registered lexical N170 effects indicative of the presence of an adult-like lexical representation system. Moreover, we observed negative correlations between reading fluency and P100 and N170 latencies, which suggest that reading fluency is affected by the speed of visual processing captured by these latencies.
引用
收藏
页码:1249 / 1262
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Smoking and neurophysiological markers of information processing in schizophrenia
    Saperstein, A.
    Avila, M. T.
    Hong, E.
    Summerfelt, A.
    Thaker, G. K.
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2007, 33 (02) : 223 - 223
  • [32] Neurophysiological Markers of Emotion Processing in Burnout Syndrome
    Golonka, Krystyna
    Mojsa-Kaja, Justyna
    Popiel, Katarzyna
    Marek, Tadeusz
    Gawlowska, Magda
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [33] Fostering Reading Success: Investigating Connected Phonation as a Key Strategy for Word Reading Fluency
    Hassler, Kathleen M.
    Cook, Sara E. C.
    Meng, Paul M.
    READING & WRITING QUARTERLY, 2025,
  • [34] Reading comprehension, word recognition, and reading fluency in sixth grade elementary school children
    Arancibia Gutierrez, Beatriz
    Leon, Hernan
    Castro Yanez, Ginette Gabriela
    Bizama Munoz, Marcela
    Saez Carrillo, Katia
    ONOMAZEIN, 2022, (55): : 156 - 173
  • [35] The Relationships of Oral Reading Fluency at Word, Sentence, and Passage Levels and Reading Comprehension in Chinese
    Jhuo, Rong-An
    Hui, Carr-Ie
    Chen, Ji-Kang
    Wang, Li-Chih
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2024, 53 (03)
  • [36] Rapid Automatized Naming, Processing Speed, and Reading Fluency
    Pape-Neumann, J.
    van-Ermingen-Marbach, M.
    Verhalen, N.
    Heim, S.
    Grande, M.
    SPRACHE-STIMME-GEHOR, 2015, 39 (01): : 30 - 35
  • [37] SEQUENTIAL PROCESSING IN READING WORD PAIRS
    SCARBOROUGH, D
    LANDAUER, T
    GUTSCHERA, K
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1979, 14 (04) : 258 - 258
  • [38] Word Reading as a Predictor of Verbal Fluency: Implications for Estimating Premorbid Functioning
    Davis, A.
    Nogin, R.
    Moss, L.
    Drapeau, C.
    Malm, S.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 27 (06) : 669 - 670
  • [39] Predicting verbal fluency using Word Reading: Implications for premorbid functioning
    Davis, Andrew S.
    Finch, W. Holmes
    Drapeau, Christopher
    Nogin, Margarita
    Moss, Lauren E.
    Moore, Brittney
    APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT, 2016, 23 (06) : 403 - 410
  • [40] From letter names to word reading: The nascent role of sublexical fluency
    Ritchey, KD
    Speece, DL
    CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 31 (03) : 301 - 327