Impact of early primary care physician follow-up on hospital readmission following gastrointestinal cancer surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Khalil, Mujtaba [1 ]
Woldesenbet, Selamawit [1 ]
Munir, Muhammad Musaab [1 ]
Khan, Muhammad Muntazir Mehdi [1 ]
Rashid, Zayed [1 ]
Altaf, Abdullah [1 ]
Katayama, Erryk [1 ]
Dillhoff, Mary [1 ]
Tsai, Susan [1 ]
Pawlik, Timothy M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 395 W 12th Ave,Suite 670, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] James Comprehens Canc Ctr, 395 W 12th Ave,Suite 670, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
care coordination; cancer; primary care physician; readmission risk; surgical outcomes; 30-DAY READMISSION; MEDICARE; DISPARITIES; DISEASE; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1002/jso.27696
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: We sought to examine the association between primary care physician (PCP) follow-up on readmission following gastrointestinal (GI) cancer surgery. Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for GI cancer were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Multivariable regression was performed to examine the association between early PCP follow-up and hospital readmission. Results: Among 60 957 patients who underwent GI cancer surgery, 19 661 (32.7%) visited a PCP within 30-days after discharge. Of note, patients who visited PCP were less likely to be readmitted within 90 days (PCP visit: 17.4% vs. no PCP visit: 28.2%; p < 0.001). Median postsurgical expenditures were lower among patients who visited a PCP (PCP visit: $4116 [IQR: $670-$13 860] vs. no PCP visit: $6700 [IQR: $870-$21 301]; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, PCP follow-up was associated with lower odds of 90-day readmission (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.50-0.55) (both p < 0.001). Moreover, patients who followed up with a PCP had lower risk of death at 90-days (HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.40-0.51; p < 0.001). Conclusion: PCP follow-up was associated with a reduced risk of readmission and mortality following GI cancer surgery. Care coordination across in-hospital and community-based health platforms is critical to achieve optimal outcomes for patients.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 248
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Follow-up in gastrointestinal cancer
    Popper, Ulrich
    Dormann, Clemens
    Rumpold, Holger
    MEMO-MAGAZINE OF EUROPEAN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 7 (02) : 102 - 106
  • [22] Follow-up in gastrointestinal cancer
    Ulrich Popper
    Clemens Dormann
    Holger Rumpold
    memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology, 2014, 7 (2) : 102 - 106
  • [23] Breast cancer follow-up by primary care physician: patient satisfaction in the Metropolitan Paris region
    Fourcade, Aurelie
    Houzard, Sophie
    Dubot, Coraline
    Fourquet, Alain
    Fridmann, Sylvie
    Dagousset, Isabelle
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2012, 99 (10) : 915 - 925
  • [24] Primary Care Physician Follow-up of Distal Radius Buckle Fractures
    Koelink, Eric
    Schuh, Suzanne
    Howard, Andrew
    Stimec, Jennifer
    Barra, Lorena
    Boutis, Kathy
    PEDIATRICS, 2016, 137 (01)
  • [25] Linked Hospital and Primary Care Database Analysis of the Incidence and Impact of Psychiatric Morbidity Following Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery in England
    Bouras, George
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    Burns, Elaine M.
    Mackenzie, Hugh A.
    Bottle, Alex
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    Hanna, George B.
    Darzi, Ara
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 264 (01) : 93 - 99
  • [26] Follow-up care for gastrointestinal tumors
    Ebert, M.
    ONKOLOGE, 2018, 24 (07): : 561 - 569
  • [27] Follow-up care for gastrointestinal tumors
    Ebert, M.
    INTERNIST, 2018, 59 (05): : 453 - 463
  • [28] Follow-up care for gastrointestinal tumors
    Ebert M.
    best practice onkologie, 2019, 14 (1-2) : 38 - 45
  • [29] Follow-up care for gastrointestinal tumors
    Ebert M.
    Der Gastroenterologe, 2018, 13 (6): : 457 - 467
  • [30] Hospital readmission risks in older adults following inpatient subacute care: A six-month follow-up study
    Lee, Den-Ching A.
    Williams, Cylie
    Lalor, Aislinn F.
    Brown, Ted
    Haines, Terry P.
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2018, 77 : 142 - 149