Task complexity and L2 writing performance of young learners: Contributions of cognitive and affective factors

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Chengchen [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Li [2 ]
Lu, Xiaojun [3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Foreign Languages, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] UCL, Inst Educ, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, England
[3] Univ Southampton, Dept Languages Cultures & Linguist, Southampton, England
来源
MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL | 2024年 / 108卷 / 03期
关键词
integrated task-mediated cognitive-affective model of L2 writing; positive psychology; task complexity; task emotion; task motivation; working memory; WORKING-MEMORY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ACHIEVEMENT EMOTIONS; 2ND-LANGUAGE; ANXIETY; ENJOYMENT; MODALITY;
D O I
10.1111/modl.12954
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The study investigated the effect of task complexity (TC) on second language (L2) learners' affective responses and writing performance and how these were modulated by cognitive and affective individual difference (ID) factors. A total of 412 Chinese 8th-grade English-as-a-foreign-language learners completed a working memory (WM) test, a scale measuring trait-like L2 writing enjoyment, a simple (n = 206) or complex (n = 206) argumentative writing task, and posttask scales measuring task-specific enjoyment and motivation. Independent t-test results showed that increased TC contributed to a slight but significant enhancement in task motivation and enjoyment and a significant performance improvement in content and organization but not in language. Structural equation modeling results showed that the cognitive and affective ID factors predicted writing performance jointly: WM and task motivation predicted writing performance consistently in both simple and complex tasks, task-specific enjoyment only played its role in the complex task, and trait-like enjoyment became insignificant in predicting task performance. These findings support the integrated task-mediated cognitive-affective model of L2 writing we propose by synthesizing and extending existing models. This study highlights the need to pay attention to the affective dimension of tasks and suggests TC as an intervention strategy to make a task more motivating and enjoyable. image
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 770
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Role of Degree of Attention on L2 Learners' Oral Task Performance
    Salimi, Asghar
    Rahimpour, Massoud
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (INTCESS14), VOLS I AND II, 2014, : 1028 - 1037
  • [32] Task Sequencing and Task Complexity Effects on L2 Writing: Does Task Order Really Matter?
    Lee, Jiyong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIA TEFL, 2021, 18 (04): : 1088 - 1107
  • [33] The effects of task complexity and task sequencing on L2 performance: a systematic review
    Jin, Chaoyang
    Yan, Jing
    [J]. LANGUAGE LEARNING JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [34] Effects of Task Complexity and Planning Conditions on L2 Argumentative Writing Production
    Rahimi, Muhammad
    Zhang, Lawrence Jun
    [J]. DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 2018, 55 (08) : 726 - 742
  • [36] Learners' uses of two types of written feedback on a L2 writing revision task
    Sachs, Rebecca
    Polio, Charlene
    [J]. STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2007, 29 (01) : 67 - 100
  • [37] Cognitive task complexity and second language writing performance
    Kuiken, Folkert
    Mos, Maria
    Vedder, Ineke
    [J]. EUROSLA YEARBOOK, VOL 5 2005, 2005, 5 : 195 - 222
  • [38] Phraseological complexity and low- and intermediate-level L2 learners' writing quality
    Jiang, Jingyang
    Bi, Peng
    Xie, Nana
    Liu, Haitao
    [J]. IRAL-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING, 2023, 61 (03): : 765 - 790
  • [39] The effects of task complexity and language aptitude on EFL learners' writing performance
    Liu, Chun-yan
    Sun, Li-ting
    He, Yan
    Wu, Nian-zhe
    [J]. ASSESSING WRITING, 2023, 58
  • [40] Automated analysis of cohesive features in L2 writing: Examining effects of task complexity and task repetition
    Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi
    Johnson, Mark D.
    Farahanynia, Mahsa
    [J]. ASSESSING WRITING, 2023, 58