The Impact of Firm Technology on Carbon Disclosure: The Critical Role of Stakeholder Pressure

被引:0
|
作者
Adetutu, Morakinyo O. [1 ]
Odusanya, Kayode A. [1 ]
Stathopoulou, Eleni [2 ]
Weyman-Jones, Thomas G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Loughborough Univ, Loughborough Business Sch, Sir Richard Morris Bldg, Leicester LE11 3TU, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Econ, 9 Mappin St, Sheffield S1 4DT, England
关键词
CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; INDUCED INNOVATION; ENERGY-EFFICIENCY; ENDOGENEITY; PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; MATTER; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1111/obes.12633
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The demand for transparency about the microeconomic sources of environmental pollution has surged recently, causing carbon disclosure to rise to the top of the global climate change discourse. In this study, we empirically investigate how the environmental performance of firm production technologies shapes their voluntary carbon disclosure behaviour and how key stakeholders influence the performance-disclosure relationship. Using a panel of 1,547 firms across 24 countries covering 2006-20, we find that firms with the most efficient technologies for reducing emissions tend to disclose their carbon impact, especially when they face more stringent environmental regulations. These high-performing firms demonstrate a tendency for non-disclosure when faced with intense shareholder and environmental activist pushback against pollution. Our findings also highlight the existence of a profitability penalty for transparent high-efficiency firms relative to comparable firms that adopt strategic silence.
引用
收藏
页码:1438 / 1471
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How Firm Performs Under Stakeholder Pressure: Unpacking the Role of Absorptive Capacity and Innovation Capability
    Singh, Sanjay Kumar
    Del Giudice, Manlio
    Nicotra, Melita
    Fiano, Fabio
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (06) : 3802 - 3813
  • [22] Impact of carbon productivity on firm performance: moderating role of industry type and firm size
    Ghose, Biswajit
    Makan, Leo Themjung
    Kabra, Kailash Chandra
    MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2023, 49 (05) : 866 - 883
  • [23] Adoption of Cleaner Technology for Climate Proactivity: a Technology-Firm-Stakeholder Framework
    Sangle, Shirish
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 20 (06) : 365 - 378
  • [24] The impact mechanism of interactive carbon disclosure on firm value moderated by investors' online social networks
    Zhu, Jing
    Zhang, Chen
    Sun, Jiaojiao
    Ding, Jiajun
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2025, 75
  • [25] Impact of stakeholder pressure on the adoption of carbon management strategies Evidence from Australia
    Yunus, Somiaya
    Elijido-Ten, Evangeline O.
    Abhayawansa, Subhash
    SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 2020, 11 (07) : 1189 - 1212
  • [26] Diverse boards and firm performance: The strategic role of carbon disclosure in heavily polluting companies in Bangladesh
    Dhar, Bablu Kumar
    Hosen, Mosharrof
    Bagis, Mehmet
    Sousa, Maria Jose
    Khatun, Kazi Masuma
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 7 (04):
  • [27] The impact of ESG disclosure on mitigating financial distress: exploring the moderating role of firm life cycle
    Suprabha, K. R.
    Sreepriya, J.
    Prasad, Krishna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISCLOSURE AND GOVERNANCE, 2024,
  • [28] The impact of voluntary environmental disclosure on firm value: Does organizational visibility play a mediation role?
    Hassan, Omaima A. G.
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 27 (08) : 1569 - 1582
  • [29] Stakeholder Pressure and Its Effect on Environmental Proactiveness and Firm Performance: The Mediating Role of Dynamic Managerial Capabilities
    Pusparini, Elok Savitri
    Soetjipto, Budi Widjaja
    Rachmawati, Riani
    Sudhartio, Lily
    PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES, 2018, 26 : 197 - 212
  • [30] THE IMPACT OF COSTLY INFORMATION INTERPRETATION ON FIRM DISCLOSURE DECISIONS
    INDJEJIKIAN, RJ
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1991, 29 (02) : 277 - 301