Development and Validation of an ICU-Venous Thromboembolism Prediction Model Using Machine Learning Approaches: A Multicenter Study

被引:1
|
作者
Jin, Jie [1 ]
Lu, Jie [1 ]
Su, Xinyang [2 ]
Xiong, Yinhuan [3 ]
Ma, Shasha [4 ]
Kong, Yang [5 ]
Xu, Hongmei [1 ]
机构
[1] Binzhou Med Univ, Sch Nursing, 525 Huanghe 3rd Rd, Binzhou 256600, Peoples R China
[2] Binzhou Med Univ Hosp, Dept Spine Surg, Binzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Binzhou Peoples Hosp, Dept Nursing, Binzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Binzhou Med Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Binzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Binzhou Med Univ, Sch Hlth Management, 346 Guanhai Rd, Yantai 264003, Peoples R China
关键词
venous thromboembolism; machine learning; algorithm; prediction model; intensive care unit; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; PULMONARY-EMBOLISM; RISK-ASSESSMENT; D-DIMER; PREVALENCE; VARIABLES;
D O I
10.2147/IJGM.S467374
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to establish and validate machine learning-based models for predicting the risk of venous Patients and Methods: The clinical data of 1494 ICU patients who underwent Doppler ultrasonography or venography between December 2020 and March 2023 were extracted from three tertiary hospitals. The Boruta algorithm was used to screen the essential variables associated with VTE. Five machine learning algorithms were employed: Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), and Logistic Regression (LR). Hyperparameter optimization was conducted on the predictive model of the training dataset. The performance in the validation dataset was measured using indicators, including the area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, specificity, and F1 score. Finally, the optimal model was interpreted using the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) package. Results: The incidence of VTE among the ICU patients in this study was 26.04%. We screened 19 crucial features for the risk prediction model development. Among the five models, the RF model performed best, with an AUC of 0.788 (95% CI: 0.738-0.838), an accuracy of 0.759 (95% CI: 0.709-0.809), a sensitivity of 0.633, and a Brier score of 0.166. Conclusion: A machine learning-based model for prediction of VTE in ICU patients were successfully developed, which could assist clinical medical staff in identifying high-risk populations for VTE in the early stages so that prevention measures can be implemented to reduce the burden on the ICU patients.
引用
收藏
页码:3279 / 3292
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development and validation of a cardiovascular risk prediction model for Sri Lankans using machine learning
    Mettananda, Chamila
    Sanjeewa, Isuru
    Arachchi, Tinul Benthota
    Wijesooriya, Avishka
    Chandrasena, Chiranjaya
    Weerasinghe, Tolani
    Solangaarachchige, Maheeka
    Ranasinghe, Achila
    Elpitiya, Isuru
    Sammandapperuma, Rashmi
    Kurukulasooriya, Sujeewani
    Ranawaka, Udaya
    Pathmeswaran, Arunasalam
    Kasturiratne, Anuradhini
    Kato, Nei
    Wickramasinghe, Rajitha
    Haddela, Prasanna
    de Silva, Janaka
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (10):
  • [32] Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Early Prognosis Prediction in ICU Patients with Malignant Tumors and Hyperkalemia
    Bu, Zhi-Jun
    Jiang, Nan
    Li, Ke-Cheng
    Lu, Zhi-Lin
    Zhang, Nan
    Yan, Shao-Shuai
    Chen, Zhi-Lin
    Hao, Yu-Han
    Zhang, Yu-Huan
    Xu, Run-Bing
    Chi, Han-Wei
    Chen, Zu-Yi
    Liu, Jian-Ping
    Wang, Dan
    Xu, Feng
    Liu, Zhao-Lan
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (30)
  • [33] Development and validation of prediction models for papillary thyroid cancer structural recurrence using machine learning approaches
    Wang, Hongxi
    Zhang, Chao
    Li, Qianrui
    Tian, Tian
    Huang, Rui
    Qiu, Jiajun
    Tian, Rong
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [34] Development and validation of inpatient mortality prediction models for patients with hyperglycemic crisis using machine learning approaches
    He, Rui
    Zhang, Kebiao
    Li, Hong
    Gu, Manping
    BMC ENDOCRINE DISORDERS, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [35] Early identification of lung cancer patients with venous thromboembolism: development and validation of a risk prediction model
    Di, Wenjuan
    Xu, Haotian
    Ling, Chunhua
    Xue, Ting
    THROMBOSIS JOURNAL, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [36] Early identification of lung cancer patients with venous thromboembolism: development and validation of a risk prediction model
    Wenjuan Di
    Haotian Xu
    Chunhua Ling
    Ting Xue
    Thrombosis Journal, 21
  • [37] Cancer Prediction With Machine Learning of Thrombi From Thrombectomy in Stroke: Multicenter Development and Validation
    Heo, JoonNyung
    Lee, Hyungwoo
    Seog, Young
    Kim, Sungeun
    Baek, Jang-Hyun
    Park, Hyungjong
    Seo, Kwon-Duk
    Kim, Gyu Sik
    Cho, Han-Jin
    Baik, Minyoul
    Yoo, Joonsang
    Kim, Jinkwon
    Lee, Jun
    Chang, Yoonkyung
    Song, Tae-Jin
    Seo, Jung Hwa
    Ahn, Seong Hwan
    Lee, Heow Won
    Kwon, Il
    Park, Eunjeong
    Kim, Byung Moon
    Kim, Dong Joon
    Kim, Young Dae
    Nam, Hyo Suk
    STROKE, 2023, 54 (08) : 2105 - 2113
  • [38] Personalized Risk Prediction for 30-Day Readmissions With Venous Thromboembolism Using Machine Learning
    Park, Jung In
    Kim, Doyub
    Lee, Jung-Ah
    Zheng, Kai
    Amin, Alpesh
    JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2021, 53 (03) : 278 - 287
  • [39] Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Diverse Populations Using Machine Learning and Structured Electronic Health Records
    Chen, Robert
    Petrazzini, Ben Omega
    Malick, Waqas A.
    Rosenson, Robert S.
    Do, Ron
    ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY, 2024, 44 (02) : 491 - 504
  • [40] International validation of the delirium prediction model for ICU patients (PREDELIRIC): a multicenter observational study
    M van den Boogaard
    L Schoonhoven
    E Maseda
    C Plowright
    C Jones
    A Luetz
    PV Sackey
    P Jorens
    LM Aitken
    F van Haren
    JG van der Hoeven
    P Pickkers
    Critical Care, 17 (Suppl 2):