The effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient- and nurse-related outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

被引:0
|
作者
Geltmeyer, Klara [1 ]
Duprez, Veerle [1 ]
Blondeel, Marie [2 ]
Serraes, Brecht [2 ]
Eeckloo, Kristof [3 ,4 ]
Malfait, Simon [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Nursing Dept, Bldg Pinterpk 2,Route 7529,Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] VITAZ Gen Hosp & Hlth Care, Clin Nursing & Allied Hlth Res & Dev Grp, St Niklaas, Belgium
[3] Ghent Univ Hosp, Strateg Policy Cell, Ghent, Belgium
[4] Univ Ghent, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
care delivery models; effectiveness; hospital setting; nursing; outcomes; systematic review; JOB-SATISFACTION; QUALITY; ALLOCATION; WARD;
D O I
10.1111/jan.16271
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimTo synthesize and assess the effectiveness of different care delivery models in a hospital setting, taking into account patient- and nurse-related outcomes.DesignA systematic review with narrative synthesis in which a comparison was made between different care delivery models.MethodsThe search string consisted of four clusters: 'nursing', 'care delivery models', 'hospital setting' and 'quantitative research designs'. Four electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to January 2023: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science.ResultsIn total, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. The most commonly compared care delivery models were functional nursing to primary nursing (n = 6), patient allocation to team nursing (n = 4), team nursing to primary nursing (n = 3) and functional nursing to modular nursing (n = 3). Only one randomized crossover trial was found, other included studies were pretest-posttest designs or quasi-experimental designs. The implementation of a nursing care delivery model was the study intervention. The following aspects of the intervention were not reported or inadequately described by the majority of the authors; tailoring of an intervention, modifications to an intervention and the adherence or fidelity to the intervention. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. Due to a high heterogeneity in outcome measures between the studies, a meta-analysis of the included studies was not possible. All included studies had a high risk of overall bias.ConclusionThis systematic review found mixed evidence, inconsistent reporting of certain elements of the interventions, high heterogeneity in outcome measures and low methodological quality. Although this systematic review could not answer which nursing care delivery model is the most effective or most promising, other important findings from this review may inform future research.Impact There are differences in care delivery model descriptions and a lack of agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of the care delivery models. No clear-cut answer can be given about the effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient- and nurse-related outcomes. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. This review can support the development of future care delivery redesign strategies.Reporting methodThe systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).Patient or public contributionNo patient or public contribution.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 155
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] State Nurse Practitioner Practice Regulations and US Health Care Delivery Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    Yang, Bo Kyum
    Johantgen, Mary E.
    Trinkoff, Alison M.
    Idzik, Shannon R.
    Wince, Jessica
    Tomlinson, Carissa
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2021, 78 (03) : 183 - 196
  • [22] A systematic review on the effect of the organisation of hospital discharge on patient health outcomes
    Couturier, Berengere
    Carrat, Fabrice
    Hejblum, Gilles
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (12):
  • [23] Patient safety vulnerabilities for children with intellectual disability in hospital: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Mimmo, Laurel
    Harrison, Reema
    Hinchcliff, Reece
    BMJ PAEDIATRICS OPEN, 2018, 2 (01)
  • [24] Implications of interprofessional primary care team characteristics for health services and patient health outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis
    Wranik, Wieslawa Dominika
    Price, Sheri
    Haydt, Susan M.
    Edwards, Jeanette
    Hatfield, Krista
    Weir, Julie
    Doria, Nicole
    HEALTH POLICY, 2019, 123 (06) : 550 - 563
  • [25] Effects of Different Models of Dialysis Care on Patient-Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ramar, Priya
    Ahmed, Ahmed T.
    Wang, Zhen
    Chawla, Sagar S.
    Suarez, Maria Lourdes Gonzalez
    Hickson, LaTonya J.
    Farrell, Ann
    Williams, Amy W.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Thorsteinsdottir, Bjorg
    POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2017, 20 (06) : 495 - 505
  • [26] Can prediction models for hospital readmission be improved by incorporating patient-reported outcome measures? A systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Yu, Maggie
    Harrison, Mark
    Bansback, Nick
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (07) : 1767 - 1779
  • [27] Effectiveness of person- and family-centred care transition interventions on patient- oriented outcomes: A systematic review
    Backman, Chantal
    Chartrand, Julie
    Crick, Michelle
    Devey Burry, Robin
    Dingwall, Orvie
    Shea, Beverley
    NURSING OPEN, 2021, 8 (02): : 721 - 754
  • [28] Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review
    Kim, Mi Ok
    Coiera, Enrico
    Magrabi, Farah
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2017, 24 (02) : 246 - 260
  • [29] Patients' experiences of patient-centred care in hospital setting: A systematic review of qualitative studies
    Havana, Tiina
    Kuha, Suvi
    Laukka, Elina
    Kanste, Outi
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2023, 37 (04) : 1001 - 1015
  • [30] Advance care planning in different settings for people with dementia: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Kelly, Adele J.
    Luckett, Tim
    Clayton, Josephine M.
    Gabb, Liam
    Kochovska, Slavica
    Agar, Meera
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2019, 17 (06) : 707 - 719