Examining How Urban Public Spaces and Virtual Spaces Affect Public Opinion in Beijing, China

被引:0
|
作者
Shao, Lingfang [1 ]
Liu, Zhengxian [1 ]
Zhou, Zijin [2 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Architecture, 2 Sipailou Rd, Nanjing 210026, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg & Real Estate, Phase 8 Block Z, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China
关键词
Friedman testing; public perceptions; SEM analysis; urban environments; virtual reality;
D O I
10.3390/su16125249
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban public spaces significantly influence public perceptions and experiences. This study, conducted in Beijing, China, employs structural equation modeling (SEM) and Friedman testing to analyze key criteria-safety, attractiveness, facilities, activities, and social environment-that impact perceptions of both virtual and physical public spaces. The findings reveal that attractiveness is the most influential criterion, significantly shaping public opinion. Facilities and activities follow, highlighting the necessity for well-equipped amenities and engaging social activities. The social environment also plays a crucial role, emphasizing the need for spaces that foster social interactions. Safety, while important, is less influential compared to the other criteria. These results underscore the importance of aesthetic considerations, well-equipped amenities, and vibrant social environments in urban design. This study provides actionable insights for urban designers and planners, advocating for a balanced approach that prioritizes these criteria to enhance the quality of life in urban areas. By focusing on these aspects, urban planners can create more effective and satisfying public spaces that meet the diverse needs of the community, ensuring that both physical and virtual spaces contribute positively to urban living.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How Does Risk-Information Communication Affect the Rebound of Online Public Opinion of Public Emergencies in China?
    Gao, Shan
    Zhang, Ye
    Liu, Wenhui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (15)
  • [42] How Much Are Public Spaces Worth? Non-Market Valuation Methods in Valuing Public Spaces
    Adamus, Jagoda
    GOSPODARKA NARODOWA-THE POLISH JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2023, 314 (02): : 66 - 89
  • [43] Public and Their Spaces
    不详
    IN BO-RICERCHE E PROGETTI PER IL TERRITORIO LA CITTA E L ARCHITETTURA, 2013, 4 (01): : 46 - 54
  • [44] Public Spaces - Public Life
    Brian Goodey
    URBAN DESIGN International, 1997, 2 (1) : 61 - 62
  • [45] PUBLIC SPACE, PUBLIC SPACES
    da Costa Gomes, Paulo Cesar
    GEOGRAPHIA-UFF, 2018, 20 (44): : 115 - 119
  • [46] Social relationships and patterns of use in urban public spaces in China and the United Kingdom
    Cao, Jingwen
    Kang, Jian
    CITIES, 2019, 93 : 188 - 196
  • [47] Public Spaces, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: Connecting Disabled Entrepreneurs to Urban Spaces
    Smith, Helen Lawton
    LAND, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [48] Opinion : Design Competition as a Means of Producing Public Cultural Spaces
    Ahyeon, Kim
    Hyunsu, Kim
    Sangmoon, Nam
    Pilsoo, Maing
    Geunju, Yoon
    Jeonghoon, Lee
    Chihoon, Lee
    Dongwoo, Yim
    Sunghun, Lim
    Namho, Cho
    Jaewon, Cho
    Hangman, Zo
    Doojin, Hwang
    SPACE, 2024, (684): : 130 - 143
  • [49] Exploring Virtual Environments to Assess the Quality of Public Spaces
    Belaroussi, Rachid
    Issa, Elie
    Cameli, Leonardo
    Lantieri, Claudio
    Adele, Sonia
    ALGORITHMS, 2024, 17 (03)
  • [50] Virtual walls? The law of pseudo-public spaces
    Mac Sithigh, DaithI
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW IN CONTEXT, 2012, 8 (03) : 394 - 412