Artificial Intelligence in Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review

被引:0
|
作者
Mueller, Simon [1 ]
Jain, Mohit [2 ]
Sachdeva, Bhuvan [2 ,3 ]
Shah, Payal N. [3 ]
Holz, Frank G. [1 ]
Finger, Robert P. [1 ,4 ]
Murali, Kaushik [3 ]
Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M. [1 ,7 ]
Schultz, Thomas [5 ,6 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bonn, Dept Ophthalmol, Venusberg Campus 1, D-53127 Bonn, Germany
[2] Microsoft Res, Bengaluru, India
[3] Sankara Eye Hosp, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Dept Ophthalmol, Mannheim, Germany
[5] Univ Bonn, B IT, Bonn, Germany
[6] Univ Bonn, Dept Comp Sci, Bonn, Germany
[7] Augenzentrum Grischun, Chur, Switzerland
[8] Lamarr Inst Machine Learning & Artificial Intellig, Dortmund, Germany
来源
关键词
cataract surgery; phacoemulsification; deep learning; convolutional neural networks; recurrent neural networks; video analysis; tracking; ophthalmology; vision transformers; risk assessment; surgical outcomes; review; SURGICAL TASKS; RECOGNITION;
D O I
10.1167/tvst.13.4.20
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the current use and reliability of artificial intelligence (AI) -based algorithms for analyzing cataract surgery videos. Methods: A systematic review of the literature about intra-operative analysis of cataract surgery videos with machine learning techniques was performed. Cataract diagnosis and detection algorithms were excluded. Resulting algorithms were compared, descriptively analyzed, and metrics summarized or visually reported. The reproducibility and reliability of the methods and results were assessed using a modified version of the Medical Image Computing and Computer -Assisted (MICCAI) checklist. Results: Thirty-eight of the 550 screened studies were included, 20 addressed the challenge of instrument detection or tracking, 9 focused on phase discrimination, and 8 predicted skill and complications. Instrument detection achieves an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC AUC) between 0.976 and 0.998, instrument tracking an mAP between 0.685 and 0.929, phase recognition an ROC AUC between 0.773 and 0.990, and complications or surgical skill performs with an ROC AUC between 0.570 and 0.970. Conclusions: The studies showed a wide variation in quality and pose a challenge regarding replication due to a small number of public datasets (none for manual small incision cataract surgery) and seldom published source code. There is no standard for reported outcome metrics and validation of the models on external datasets is rare making comparisons difficult. The data suggests that tracking of instruments and phase detection work well but surgical skill and complication recognition remains a challenge for deep learning. Translational Relevance: This overview of cataract surgery analysis with AI models provides translational value for improving training of the clinician by identifying successes and challenges.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Artificial intelligence applications and cataract management: A systematic review
    Tognetto, Daniele
    Giglio, Rosa
    Vinciguerra, Alex Lucia
    Milan, Serena
    Rejdak, Robert
    Rejdak, Magdalena
    Zaluska-Ogryzek, Katarzyna
    Zweifel, Sandrine
    Toro, Mario Damiano
    [J]. SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 67 (03) : 817 - 829
  • [2] Artificial intelligence in cardiac surgery: A systematic review
    Sulague, Ralf Martz
    Beloy, Francis Joshua
    Medina, Jillian Reeze
    Mortalla, Edward Daniel
    Cartojano, Thea Danielle
    Macapagal, Sharina
    Kpodonu, Jacques
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024,
  • [3] Artificial intelligence in cataract and refractive surgery
    Grzybowski, Andrzej
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2024, 102
  • [4] Conversational Artificial Intelligence in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Zargaran, A.
    Sousi, S.
    Ahmed, Z.
    Zargaran, D.
    Mosahebi, A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [5] The role of artificial intelligence in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review
    Schlanger, D.
    Graur, F.
    Popa, C.
    Mois, E.
    Al Hajjar, N.
    [J]. UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2022, 74 (02) : 417 - 429
  • [6] The State of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Elahmedi, Mohamed
    Sawhney, Riya
    Guadagno, Elena
    Botelho, Fabio
    Poenaru, Dan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2024, 59 (05) : 774 - 782
  • [7] The role of artificial intelligence in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review
    D. Schlanger
    F. Graur
    C. Popa
    E. Moiș
    N. Al Hajjar
    [J]. Updates in Surgery, 2022, 74 : 417 - 429
  • [8] Artificial Intelligence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Firriolo, Joseph M.
    Nuzzi, Laura C.
    Labow, Brian I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2019, 229 (04) : S219 - S220
  • [9] Artificial intelligence in cornea, refractive, and cataract surgery
    Siddiqui, Aazim A.
    Ladas, John G.
    Lee, Jimmy K.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 31 (04) : 253 - 260
  • [10] Evolution and Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Cataract Surgery
    Lindegger, Daniel Josef
    Wawrzynski, James
    Saleh, George Michael
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY SCIENCE, 2022, 2 (03):