Ten Misunderstandings about Maturity Models

被引:12
|
作者
Andersen, Kim Normann [1 ]
Lee, Jungwoo [2 ]
Mettler, Tobias [3 ]
Moon, M. Jae [4 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Digitalizat, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Yonsei Univ, Ctr Work Sci, ICONS, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Univ Lausanne, Swiss Grad Sch Publ Adm, Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] Yonsei Univ, Dept Publ Adm, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Stage model; maturity model; electronic government; government digitalization; E-GOVERNMENT; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; DESIGN SCIENCE; EVOLUTION; MUNICIPALITIES;
D O I
10.1145/3396956.3396980
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this paper, we take the initial steps of re-formulating the research agenda on maturity models within the government context. Critiques on maturity models in government digitalization has been collected via a systematic review of academic literature. Synthesis of the articles (n=47) has resulted in a list of ten objections and critique of maturity models. The author team of this paper has been heavily involved in pioneering and leading research on maturity models. Standing on the shoulders of this track-record, we have coinedf a possible response on how maturity models might still have an important role to play in theorizing about why, how and where government progresses in their use of digital technologies. Also, we argue that maturity models have an important role to play for practice in their navigation in a yet more multifaceted technological dependent government.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 266
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条