Use of modelling tools to assess climate change impacts on smallholder oil seed yields in South Africa

被引:1
|
作者
Kephe, Priscilla Ntuchu [1 ,2 ]
Mkuhlani, Siyabusa [3 ]
Rusere, Farirai [4 ]
Chemura, Abel [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Assoc, Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, Potsdam, Germany
[2] Univ Limpopo, Risk & Vulnerabil Sci Ctr, Polokwane, South Africa
[3] Int Inst Trop Agr, ICIPE, Nairobi, Kenya
[4] Univ Witwatersrand, Fac Sci, Sch Anim Plant & Environm Sci, Wits Rural Knowledge Hub, Johannesburg, South Africa
[5] Univ Twente, Fac Geoinformat Sci & Earth Observat, Nat Resources Dept, Enschede, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 05期
关键词
CROP; PHOTOINHIBITION; ADAPTATION; CAMELINA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0301254
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Oil seed crops are the second most important field crops after cereals in the agricultural economy globally. The use and demand for oilseed crops such as groundnut, soybean and sunflower have grown significantly, but climate change is expected to alter the agroecological conditions required for oilseed crop production. This study aims to present an approach that utilizes decision-making tools to assess the potential climate change impacts on groundnut, soybean and sunflower yields and the greenhouse gas emissions from the management of the crops. The Decision Support Tool for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT v4.7), a dynamic crop model and the Cool Farm Tool, a GHG calculator, was used to simulate yields and estimate GHG emissions from these crops, respectively. Four representative concentration pathways (RCPs 2.6, 4.5, 6.0, and 8.5), three nitrogen (0, 75, and 150 kg/ha) and phosphorous (0, 30 and 60 P kg/ha) fertilizer rates at three sites in Limpopo, South Africa (Ofcolaco, Syferkuil and Punda Maria) were used in field trials for calibrating the models. The highest yield was achieved by sunflower across all crops, years and sites. Soybean yield is projected to decrease across all sites and scenarios by 2030 and 2050, except at Ofcolaco, where yield increases of at least 15.6% is projected under the RCP 4.5 scenario. Positive climate change impacts are predicted for groundnut at Ofcolaco and Syferkuil by 2030 and 2050, while negative impacts with losses of up to 50% are projected under RCP8.5 by 2050 at Punda Maria. Sunflower yield is projected to decrease across all sites and scenarios by 2030 and 2050. A comparison of the climate change impacts across sites shows that groundnut yield is projected to increase under climate change while notable yield losses are projected for sunflower and soybean. GHG emissions from the management of each crop showed that sunflower and groundnut production had the highest and lowest emissions across all sites respectively. With positive climate change impacts, a reduction of GHG emissions per ton per hectare was projected for groundnuts at Ofcolaco and Syferkuil and for sunflower in Ofcolaco in the future. However, the carbon footprint from groundnut is expected to increase by 40 to 107% in Punda Maria for the period up to 2030 and between 70-250% for 2050, with sunflower following a similar trend. We conclude that climate change will potentially reduce yield for oilseed crops while management will increase emissions. Therefore, in designing adaptation measures, there is a need to consider emission effects to gain a holistic understanding of how both climate change impacts on crops and mitigation efforts could be targeted.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessing climate change impacts on sorghum and millet yields in the Sudanian and Sahelian savannas of West Africa
    Sultan, B.
    Roudier, P.
    Quirion, P.
    Alhassane, A.
    Muller, B.
    Dingkuhn, M.
    Ciais, P.
    Guimberteau, M.
    Traore, S.
    Baron, C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 8 (01):
  • [32] The socio-economic impacts of climate change on water resources in South Africa
    Juana, James S.
    Mangadi, Kagiso T.
    Strzepek, Kenneth M.
    WATER INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 37 (03) : 265 - 278
  • [33] Use and misuse of modelling for projections of climate change impacts on crops and pastures
    Soussana, Jean-Francois
    Tubiello, Francesco N.
    Graux, Anne-Isabelle
    COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY A-MOLECULAR & INTEGRATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 153A (02): : S223 - S224
  • [34] Improving the use of modelling for projections of climate change impacts on crops and pastures
    Soussana, Jean-Francois
    Graux, Anne-Isabelle
    Tubiello, Francesco N.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2010, 61 (08) : 2217 - 2228
  • [35] Modelling impacts of climate change on wheat yields in England and Wales: assessing.drought risks
    Richter, GM
    Semenov, MA
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2005, 84 (01) : 77 - 97
  • [36] North-South divide: contrasting impacts of climate change on crop yields in Scotland and England
    Butterworth, Michael H.
    Semenov, Mikhail A.
    Barnes, Andrew
    Moran, Dominic
    West, Jonathan S.
    Fitt, Bruce D. L.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2010, 7 (42) : 123 - 130
  • [37] Climate Change Grounded on Empirical Evidence as Compared with the Perceptions of Smallholder Farmers in Vhembe District, South Africa
    Kom, Zongho
    Nethengwe, Nthaduleni S.
    Mpandeli, Sylvester
    Chikoore, Hector
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN AND AFRICAN STUDIES, 2020, 55 (05) : 683 - 698
  • [38] The Perceived Impact of Climate Change on the Livelihoods of Smallholder Farmers in Kwazulu-Natal Province, South Africa
    Maziya, Mbongeni
    Nkonki-Mandleni, Busisiwe
    Mbizana, Nandipha
    Tirivanhu, Precious
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [39] Modelling physiological costs to assess impacts of climate change on amphibians in Yellowstone National Park, USA
    Bartelt, Paul E.
    Thornton, Peter E.
    Klaver, Robert W.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 135
  • [40] An inverse-modelling approach to assess the impacts of climate change in the Seyhan River basin, Turkey
    Fujihara, Yoichi
    Simonovic, Slobodan P.
    Topaloglu, Fatih
    Tanaka, Kenji
    Watanabe, Tsugihiro
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2008, 53 (06): : 1121 - 1136