What is Quantum in probabilistic explanations of the sure-thing principle violation?

被引:0
|
作者
Mahalli, Nematollah Farhadi [1 ]
Pusuluk, Onur [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Koc Univ, Dept Phys, TR-34450 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Kadir Has Univ, Fac Engn & Nat Sci, TR-34083 Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Prisoner's dilemma; Sure thing principle; Quantum coherence; Generalized probabilistic theories; UNCERTAINTY; NONLOCALITY; DYNAMICS; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105180
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Prisoner's Dilemma game (PDG) is one of the simple test -beds for the probabilistic nature of the human decision -making process. Behavioral experiments have been conducted on this game for decades and show a violation of the so-called sure -thing principle , a key principle in the rational theory of decision. Quantum probabilistic models can explain this violation as a second -order interference effect, which cannot be accounted for by classical probability theory. Here, we adopt the framework of generalized probabilistic theories and approach this explanation from the viewpoint of quantum information theory to identify the source of the interference. In particular, we reformulate one of the existing quantum probabilistic models using density matrix formalism and consider different amounts of classical and quantum uncertainties for one player's prediction about another player's action in PDG. This enables us to demonstrate that what makes possible the explanation of the violation is the presence of quantum coherence in the player's initial prediction and its conversion to probabilities during the dynamics. Moreover, we discuss the role of other quantum informationtheoretical quantities, such as quantum entanglement, in the decision -making process. Finally, we propose a three -choice extension of the PDG to compare the predictive powers of quantum probability theory and a more general probabilistic theory that includes it as a particular case and exhibits third -order interference.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Sure-thing vs. probabilistic charitable giving: Experimental evidence on the role of individual differences in risky and ambiguous charitable decision-making
    Schoenegger, Philipp
    Costa-Gomes, Miguel
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (09):
  • [33] Can qualitative utility criteria obey the sure thing principle?
    Fargier, H
    Sabbadin, R
    TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONSTRUCTING INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS 1: TASKS, 2002, 89 : 167 - 177
  • [35] The quantum pigeonhole principle as a violation of the principle of bivalence
    Arkady Bolotin
    Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations, 2019, 6 : 55 - 60
  • [36] Equivalence principle violation for quantum particles
    Eroshenko, Yu N.
    PHYSICS-USPEKHI, 2020, 63 (12) : 1266 - 1266
  • [37] Quantum violation of the pigeonhole principle and the nature of quantum correlations
    Aharonov, Yakir
    Colombo, Fabrizio
    Popescu, Sandu
    Sabadini, Irene
    Struppa, Daniele C.
    Tollaksen, Jeff
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (03) : 532 - 535
  • [38] POSSIBILISTIC REASONING FROM PARTIALLY ORDERED BELIEF BASES WITH THE SURE THING PRINCIPLE
    Cayrol, Claudette
    Dubois, Didier
    Touazi, Faycal
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED LOGICS-IFCOLOG JOURNAL OF LOGICS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS, 2018, 5 (01): : 5 - 39
  • [39] Possibilistic reasoning from partially ordered belief bases with the sure thing principle
    Cayrol, Claudette
    Dubois, Didier
    Touazi, Fayçal
    Journal of Applied Logics, 2018, 5 (01): : 5 - 39
  • [40] The sure thing principle and the value of information (vol 42, pg 21, 1997)
    Schlee, EE
    THEORY AND DECISION, 1998, 45 (02) : 199 - 200