Conditional Syntax Splitting for Non-monotonic Inference Operators

被引:0
|
作者
Heyninck, Jesse [1 ]
Kern-Isberner, Gabriele [2 ]
Meyer, Thomas [3 ,4 ]
Haldimann, Jonas Philipp [5 ]
Beierle, Christoph [5 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ, Heerlen, Netherlands
[2] Tech Univ Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
[3] Univ Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa
[4] CAIR, Rondebosch, South Africa
[5] FernUniv, Hagen, Germany
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Syntax splitting is a property of inductive inference operators that ensures we can restrict our attention to parts of the conditional belief base that share atoms with a given query. To apply syntax splitting, a conditional belief base needs to consist of syntactically disjoint conditionals. This requirement is often too strong in practice, as conditionals might share atoms. In this paper we introduce the concept of conditional syntax splitting, inspired by the notion of conditional independence as known from probability theory. We show that lexicographic inference and system W satisfy conditional syntax splitting, and connect conditional syntax splitting to several known properties from the literature on non-monotonic reasoning, including the drowning effect.
引用
收藏
页码:6416 / 6424
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] On non-monotonic strategic reasoning
    Catonini, Emiliano
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2020, 120 : 209 - 224
  • [32] Robust inference for longitudinal data analysis with non-ignorable and non-monotonic missing values
    Tseng, Chi-hong
    Elashoff, Robert
    Li, Ning
    Li, Gang
    STATISTICS AND ITS INTERFACE, 2012, 5 (04) : 479 - 490
  • [33] Monotonic and Non-monotonic Embeddings of Anselm's Proof
    Archambault, Jacob
    LOGICA UNIVERSALIS, 2017, 11 (01) : 121 - 138
  • [34] Monotonic and Non-monotonic Embeddings of Anselm’s Proof
    Jacob Archambault
    Logica Universalis, 2017, 11 : 121 - 138
  • [35] Evaluation of monotonic and non-monotonic dissipation test results
    Imre, Emoke
    Rozsa, Pal
    Bates, Lachlan
    Fityus, Stephen
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2010, 37 (7-8) : 885 - 904
  • [36] Wellfoundedness proofs by means of non-monotonic inductive definitions II: First order operators
    Arai, Toshiyasu
    ANNALS OF PURE AND APPLIED LOGIC, 2010, 162 (02) : 107 - 143
  • [37] Choice and prohibition in non-monotonic contexts
    Gotzner, Nicole
    Romoli, Jacopo
    Santorio, Paolo
    NATURAL LANGUAGE SEMANTICS, 2020, 28 (02) : 141 - 174
  • [38] Storage capacity of non-monotonic neurons
    Crespi, B
    NEURAL NETWORKS, 1999, 12 (10) : 1377 - 1389
  • [39] Is non-monotonic reasoning always harder?
    Egly, U
    Tompits, H
    LOGIC PROGRAMMING AND NONMONOTONIC REASONING, 1997, 1265 : 60 - 75
  • [40] On the non-monotonic behaviour of fire spread
    Viegas, Domingos Xavier Filomeno Carlos
    Raposo, Jorge Rafael Nogueira
    Ribeiro, Carlos Fernando Morgado
    Reis, Luis Carlos Duarte
    Abouali, Abdelrahman
    Viegas, Carlos Xavier Pais
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2021, 30 (09) : 702 - 719