Minimally invasive outpatient hysterectomy for a benign indication: A systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Emery, Shahzia Lambat [1 ,2 ]
Jeannot, Emilien [3 ]
Dallenbach, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
Petignat, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
Dubuisson, Jean [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Geneva Univ Hosp, Dept Paediat Gynaecol & Obstet, 30 Blvd Cluse, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, 30 Blvd Cluse, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Univ Geneva, Inst Global Hlth, Fac Med, CH-1202 Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
Outpatient surgery; Minimally invasive hysterectomy; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Cost reduction; Public health; SAME-DAY DISCHARGE; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ENHANCED RECOVERY; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102804
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Outpatient surgery in gynaecology may offer advantages including cost reduction, patient convenience and hospital bed optimisation without compromising patient safety and satisfaction. With the continual rise in health costs since 2000, outpatient surgery could be a line of action to improve financial resource utilisation and a solution for continuing to treat patients during crises such as the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Objective: This systematic review provides an overview of the literature on minimally invasive outpatient hysterectomy for benign indications. Method: A focused systematic review of the medical literature between 2018 and 2022 on outpatient gynaecological surgery for a benign indication was conducted using the PubMed and Google Scholar search engines. We then narrowed our selection to articles that referred to hysterectomy. Successful same-day discharge (SDD) was defined as the patient's return home on the day of the procedure without an overnight stay. Results: Fifteen articles that focused on minimally invasive surgery were included in this review. Most of the studies (n = 11) were conducted in the United States. Outpatient surgery had a mean success rate of 60 % and a mean readmission rate of 3 %. The main reasons for SDD failure were patient choice, failed voiding, the need for pain management, nausea or vomiting, or both and the late timing of surgery. SDD was not associated with more complications and readmissions compared with inpatient care. The three main attribute predictors of SDD were young age, early timing of surgery and short total operative time. Patient satisfaction with SDD was high in absolute terms and relative to satisfaction with hospitalisation. Conclusion: Minimally invasive outpatient hysterectomy for a benign indication is feasible and safe but is associated with a notable risk of failure. To increase the success rate of outpatient management, patients must be well selected and surgery pathways must be planned in advance. The implementation of enhanced recovery protocols may help promote outpatient hysterectomy for a benign indication.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Innovations in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
    Ridgeway, Beri
    Falcone, Tommaso
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 57 (01): : 83 - 94
  • [32] Outpatient Hysterectomy versus Inpatient Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ellinides, Andreas
    Manolopoulos, Philip P.
    Hajymiri, Melika
    Sergentanis, Theodoros N.
    Trompoukis, Pantelis
    Ntourakis, Dimitrios
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 29 (01) : 23 - +
  • [33] Minimally invasive hysterectomy same-day discharge: systematic review and meta-analysis of predictors
    Xue Dong
    Ai Zheng
    Xin Tan
    Tao Guo
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2024, 310 (6) : 2811 - 2822
  • [34] The effects of uterine manipulators in minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Meng, Yifan
    Liu, Yan
    Lin, Shitong
    Cao, Canhui
    Wu, Ping
    Gao, Peipei
    Zhi, Wenhua
    Peng, Ting
    Gui, Lingli
    Wu, Peng
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (07): : 1225 - 1232
  • [35] Prostate Artery Embolization as Minimally Invasive Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: An Updated Systematic Review
    Ini, Corrado
    Vasile, Tiziana
    Foti, Pietro Valerio
    Timpanaro, Concetta
    Castiglione, Davide Giuseppe
    Libra, Federica
    Falsaperla, Daniele
    Tiralongo, Francesco
    Giurazza, Francesco
    Mosconi, Cristina
    David, Emanuele
    Palmucci, Stefano
    Lavalle, Salvatore
    Venturini, Massimo
    Basile, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (09)
  • [36] Clinical effectiveness of minimally invasive interventions for benign prostatic enlargement: Evidence from a systematic review
    Lourenco, Tania
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 608 - 609
  • [37] Minimally Invasive Treatments for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Cornu, Jean-Nicolas
    Zantek, Paul
    Burtt, Glyn
    Martin, Chris
    Martin, Alison
    Springate, Cassandra
    Chughtai, Bilal
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 (06) : 534 - 547
  • [38] Minimally Invasive Treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Sajan, Abin
    Mehta, Tej
    Desai, Pratik
    Isaacson, Ari
    Bagla, Sandeep
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (04) : 359 - +
  • [39] Social determinants of access to minimally invasive hysterectomy: reevaluating the relationship between race and route of hysterectomy for benign disease
    Price, Joan T.
    Zimmerman, Lilli D.
    Koelper, Nathan C.
    Sammel, Mary D.
    Lee, Sonya
    Butts, Samantha F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 217 (05) : 572.e1 - 572.e10
  • [40] IMPLEMENTATION AND FEASIBILITY OF PROPHYLACTIC BILATERAL SALPINGECTOMY AT BENIGN, MINIMALLY INVASIVE HYSTERECTOMY IN STYRIA (AUSTRIA)
    Hutter, C.
    Tamussino, K.
    Simon, K.
    Kratky, M.
    Mutz-Eckhart, C.
    Blatt-Gunegger, M.
    Klammer, S.
    Bermann, C.
    Huber, A.
    Lessiak, V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 : A232 - A232