A Comparison of Amyloid Deposition in Endoscopic and Open Carpal Tunnel Release

被引:1
|
作者
Ozdag, Yagiz [1 ]
Koshinski, Jessica L. [1 ]
Carry, Brendan J. [2 ]
Gardner, Jerad M. [3 ,4 ]
Garcia, Victoria C. [1 ]
Dwyer, C. Liam [1 ]
Akoon, Anil [1 ]
Klena, Joel C. [1 ]
Grandizio, Louis C. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Geisinger Commonwealth Sch Med, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Inst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Danville, PA USA
[2] Geisinger Hlth Syst, Heart Inst, Dept Cardiol, Danville, PA USA
[3] Geisinger Hlth Syst, Dept Lab Med, Danville, PA USA
[4] Geisinger Hlth Syst, Dept Dermatol, Danville, PA USA
[5] Geisinger Commonwealth Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 16 Woodbine Lane, Danville, PA 17821 USA
来源
关键词
Amyloidosis; biopsy; carpal tunnel syndrome; endoscopic carpal tunnel release; open carpal tunnel release; CARDIAC AMYLOIDOSIS; SYSTEMIC AMYLOIDOSIS; DIAGNOSIS; LIGAMENT; SOCIETY; TENDON; COMMON;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.01.002
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Previous investigations assessing the incidence of amyloidosis detected with biopsy during carpal tunnel release (CTR) have focused on open CTR (OCTR). Prior authors have suggested that biopsy may be more technically challenging during endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR). Our purpose was to compare differences in the incidence of amyloid deposition detected during ECTR versus OCTR. Methods We reviewed all primary ECTR and OCTR during which a biopsy for amyloid was obtained between February 2022 and June 2023. All procedures were performed by fi ve upperextremity surgeons from a single institution. Congo red staining was used to determine the presence of amyloid deposition in either the transverse carpal ligament (TCL) or tenosynovium. All positive cases underwent subtype analysis and protein identi fi cation through liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry. Baseline demographics were recorded for each case, and the incidence of positive biopsy was compared between ECTR and OCTR cases. Results A total of 282 cases were included for analysis (143 ECTR and 139 OCTR). The mean age was 67 years, and 45% of cases were women. Baseline demographics were similar except for a signi fi cantly higher incidence of diabetes in OCTR cases (13% vs 33%). Overall, 13% of CTR cases had a positive biopsy. There was a statistically signi fi cant difference in the incidence of amyloid deposition detected during biopsy in ECTR cases (3.5%) compared with OCTR cases (23%). Conclusions Biopsy performed during ECTR may result in a lower incidence of amyloid detection. Future basic science investigation may be necessary to determine histologic differences between tenosynovium proximal and distal to the leading edge of the TCL. When surgeons plan a biopsy during surgical release of the carpal tunnel, an open approach may be advantageous. (J Hand Surg Am. 2024;49(4):301 - 309. Copyright (c) 2024 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 309
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Carpel tunnel syndrome: A review of endoscopic release of the transverse carpal ligament compared with open carpal tunnel release
    Janz, C
    Hammersen, S
    Brock, M
    NEUROSURGERY QUARTERLY, 2001, 11 (01) : 17 - 25
  • [22] Multistate Comparison of Cost, Trends, and Complications in Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release
    Williamson, Emilie R. C.
    Vasquez Montes, Dennis
    Melamed, Eitan
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2021, 16 (01): : 25 - 31
  • [23] Morphologic Analysis of the Carpal Tunnel and Median Nerve Following Open and Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release
    Peters, Blair R.
    Martin, Amanda M.
    Memauri, Brett F.
    Bock, Hardy W.
    Turner, Robert B.
    Murray, Kenneth A.
    Islur, Avinash
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2021, 16 (03): : 310 - 315
  • [24] Predictive Factors for Converting Endoscopic to Open Carpal Tunnel Release
    Coady-Fariborzian, Loretta
    Anstead, Christy
    PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024,
  • [25] The Environmental Impact of Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release
    Zhang, Dafang
    Dyer, George S. M.
    Blazar, Philip
    Earp, Brandon E.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2023, 48 (01): : 46 - 52
  • [26] Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A decision analysis
    Vasen, AP
    Kuntz, KM
    Simmons, BP
    Katz, JN
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 24A (05): : 1109 - 1117
  • [27] Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: A randomized trial
    MacDermid, JC
    Richards, RS
    Roth, JH
    Ross, DC
    King, GJW
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 28A (03): : 475 - 480
  • [28] Early Outcomes of Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release
    Miles, Megan R.
    Shetty, Pragna N.
    Bhayana, Kovid
    Yousaf, Imran S.
    Sanghavi, Kavya K.
    Giladi, Aviram M.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2021, 46 (10): : 868 - 876
  • [29] Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Open or Endoscopic Release Surgery Method?
    Hajibarati, Babak
    Molaei, Hojjat
    Hasanzadeh, Alireza
    Ahmadzade, Ali
    Mirshahi, Maryam
    Abdorrazzaghi, Hosseinali
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2022, 10 (08): : 677 - 682
  • [30] Differential indication for open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release
    Mailander, P
    Berger, A
    CHIRURG, 1997, 68 (11): : 1106 - 1111