A Comparison of Amyloid Deposition in Endoscopic and Open Carpal Tunnel Release

被引:1
|
作者
Ozdag, Yagiz [1 ]
Koshinski, Jessica L. [1 ]
Carry, Brendan J. [2 ]
Gardner, Jerad M. [3 ,4 ]
Garcia, Victoria C. [1 ]
Dwyer, C. Liam [1 ]
Akoon, Anil [1 ]
Klena, Joel C. [1 ]
Grandizio, Louis C. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Geisinger Commonwealth Sch Med, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Inst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Danville, PA USA
[2] Geisinger Hlth Syst, Heart Inst, Dept Cardiol, Danville, PA USA
[3] Geisinger Hlth Syst, Dept Lab Med, Danville, PA USA
[4] Geisinger Hlth Syst, Dept Dermatol, Danville, PA USA
[5] Geisinger Commonwealth Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 16 Woodbine Lane, Danville, PA 17821 USA
来源
关键词
Amyloidosis; biopsy; carpal tunnel syndrome; endoscopic carpal tunnel release; open carpal tunnel release; CARDIAC AMYLOIDOSIS; SYSTEMIC AMYLOIDOSIS; DIAGNOSIS; LIGAMENT; SOCIETY; TENDON; COMMON;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.01.002
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Previous investigations assessing the incidence of amyloidosis detected with biopsy during carpal tunnel release (CTR) have focused on open CTR (OCTR). Prior authors have suggested that biopsy may be more technically challenging during endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR). Our purpose was to compare differences in the incidence of amyloid deposition detected during ECTR versus OCTR. Methods We reviewed all primary ECTR and OCTR during which a biopsy for amyloid was obtained between February 2022 and June 2023. All procedures were performed by fi ve upperextremity surgeons from a single institution. Congo red staining was used to determine the presence of amyloid deposition in either the transverse carpal ligament (TCL) or tenosynovium. All positive cases underwent subtype analysis and protein identi fi cation through liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry. Baseline demographics were recorded for each case, and the incidence of positive biopsy was compared between ECTR and OCTR cases. Results A total of 282 cases were included for analysis (143 ECTR and 139 OCTR). The mean age was 67 years, and 45% of cases were women. Baseline demographics were similar except for a signi fi cantly higher incidence of diabetes in OCTR cases (13% vs 33%). Overall, 13% of CTR cases had a positive biopsy. There was a statistically signi fi cant difference in the incidence of amyloid deposition detected during biopsy in ECTR cases (3.5%) compared with OCTR cases (23%). Conclusions Biopsy performed during ECTR may result in a lower incidence of amyloid detection. Future basic science investigation may be necessary to determine histologic differences between tenosynovium proximal and distal to the leading edge of the TCL. When surgeons plan a biopsy during surgical release of the carpal tunnel, an open approach may be advantageous. (J Hand Surg Am. 2024;49(4):301 - 309. Copyright (c) 2024 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 309
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of morphologic consequences of open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release
    Aslani, Hamidreza
    Zafarani, Zohreh
    Najafi, Arvin
    Alizadeh, Khalil
    Farjad, Reza
    Ghahremani, Saman
    Mosavvari, Masoud
    Lahiji, Farivar Abdollahzadeh
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 120 : 96 - 98
  • [2] ENDOSCOPIC CARPAL-TUNNEL RELEASE - A COMPARISON OF 2 TECHNIQUES WITH OPEN RELEASE
    PALMER, DH
    PAULSON, JC
    LANELARSEN, CL
    PEULEN, VK
    OLSON, JD
    ARTHROSCOPY, 1993, 9 (05): : 498 - 508
  • [3] Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: Techniques, Controversies, and Comparison to Open Techniques
    Hacquebord, Jacques H.
    Chen, Jeffrey S.
    Rettig, Michael E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (07) : 292 - 301
  • [4] Open vs endoscopic carpal tunnel release
    Gibbs, KE
    Rand, W
    Ruby, LK
    ORTHOPEDICS, 1996, 19 (12) : 1025 - 1028
  • [5] Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release
    Abrams, Reid
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 34A (03): : 535 - 539
  • [6] Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release
    Vasiliadis, Haris S.
    Xenakis, Theodoros A.
    Mitsionis, Grigorios
    Paschos, Nikolaos
    Georgoulis, Anastasios
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2010, 26 (01): : 26 - 33
  • [7] Endoscopic compared with open carpal tunnel release
    Brown, LG
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A (05): : 964 - 964
  • [8] Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release
    Mintalucci, Dominic J.
    Leinberry, Charles F., Jr.
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 43 (04) : 431 - +
  • [9] Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release
    Shin, Eon K.
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (04) : 509 - 514
  • [10] Complications of endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release
    Benson, Leon S.
    Bare, Aaron A.
    Nagle, Daniel J.
    Harder, Valerie S.
    Williams, Craig S.
    Visotsky, Jeffrey L.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2006, 22 (09): : 919 - 924