The efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 prophylaxis and clinical assessment: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials

被引:0
|
作者
Han, Xudong [1 ]
Shi, Wei [1 ]
Yang, Ya [1 ]
机构
[1] Dahua Hosp, Nursing Dept, 901 Laohumin Rd, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
关键词
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); hydroxychloroquine (HCQ); efficacy; adverse events; prophylaxis; CORONAVIRUS; CHLOROQUINE; BIAS;
D O I
10.21037/jtd-24-144
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a disease that affected tens of millions of people, upended the lives of countless individuals around the globe. The chloroquine (CQ) and its analogue hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) were the most frequently cited as potential treatments and preventatives against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The primary aim of this investigation was to scrutinize the effectiveness and safety of HCQ for COVID-19 prevention and to present powerful evidence and reference for clinical practice. Methods: PubMed, Ovid and the Cochrane COVID-19 Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were systematically searched from inception to January 31, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) trials that included participants who were SARS-CoV-2 negative at the time of registration were enrolled in this metaanalysis. The intervention group took HCQ or CQ orally. The control group was not blinded by quinine or placebo. Pooled relative risk (RR) of SARS-CoV-2 infection, mortality, hospitalization, adverse events, and compliance were calculated. The software tools utilized for statistical analyses were Stata 14 and Review Manager 5.3. Results: A total of 9 studies including 7,825 participants were enrolled. Bias of individual studies were assessed as low risk. The pooled RR for SARS-CoV-2 infection was 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-0.83] (z=-4.01, P<0.0001; I-2=11%). The pooled RR for hospitalization was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.35-1.50) (z=0.87, P=0.39; I-2=0.0%). The pooled RR for mortality and adverse events were 3.26 (95% CI: 0.13-79.74) (z=0.72, P=0.47; I-2=0.0%) and 1.90 (95% CI: 1.20-3.02) (z=2.73, P=0.0063; I-2=94%). Conclusions: Results of this meta-analysis indicated significant impact of HCQ on SARS-CoV-2 infection with higher risk of adverse events. These findings must be considered with caution, and further research is necessary to delineate the specific circumstances where HCQ may be effective for COVID-19 prevention.
引用
收藏
页码:2983 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hydroxychloroquine safety: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Eljaaly, Khalid
    Alireza, Kasim Huseein
    Alshehri, Samah
    Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A.
    TRAVEL MEDICINE AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2020, 36
  • [32] No benefit of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19: Results of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Pathak, Subodh Kumar
    Salunke, Abhijeet Ashok
    Thivari, Praveen
    Pandey, Apurva
    Nandy, Kunal
    Ratna, Harish V. K.
    Pandey, Sanjay
    Chawla, Jasneet
    Mujawar, Jalil
    Dhanwate, Anant
    Menon, Vivek
    DIABETES & METABOLIC SYNDROME-CLINICAL RESEARCH & REVIEWS, 2020, 14 (06) : 1673 - 1680
  • [33] Hydroxychloroquine for treatment of COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe
    Marra, Alexandre Rodrigues
    Matos, Leandro Luongo
    Serpa Neto, Ary
    Rizzo, Luiz Vicente
    Cendoroglo Neto, Miguel
    Lenza, Mario
    EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO, 2022, 20 : eRW0045
  • [34] Safety and Efficacy of Camostat Mesylate for Covid-19: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of Randomized controlled trials
    Khan, Ubaid
    Mubariz, Muhammad
    Khlidj, Yehya
    Nasir, Muhammad Moiz
    Ramadan, Shrouk
    Saeed, Fatima
    Muhammad, Aiman
    Abuelazm, Mohamed
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [35] Safety and efficacy of colchicine in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials
    Yasmin, Farah
    Najeeb, Hala
    Moeed, Abdul
    Hassan, Wardah
    Khatri, Mahima
    Asghar, Muhammad Sohaib
    Naveed, Ahmed Kunwer
    Ullah, Waqas
    Surani, Salim
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (04):
  • [36] Efficacy and Safety of Molnupiravir Treatment for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Tian, Fangyuan
    Feng, Qiyi
    Chen, Zhaoyan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2023, 62 (02)
  • [37] Efficacy and safety of antiplatelet therapy in COVID-19: Insights from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Kao, Guoying
    Chen, Yunlin
    Fan, Jinqi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 62 (05) : 195 - 203
  • [38] Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines in Phase III Trials: A Meta-Analysis
    Cheng, Haoyue
    Peng, Zhicheng
    Luo, Wenliang
    Si, Shuting
    Mo, Minjia
    Zhou, Haibo
    Xin, Xing
    Liu, Hui
    Yu, Yunxian
    VACCINES, 2021, 9 (06)
  • [39] Efficacy and Safety of Saroglitazar in the Management of Atherogenic Dyslipidemia: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Oliveira, Vinicius M.
    Oliveira, Izadora C.
    Menezes Junior, Antonio da Silva
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [40] Efficacy and safety of colchicine in COVID-19: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Mehta, Kedar Gautambhai
    Patel, Tejas
    Chavda, Paragkumar D.
    Patel, Parvati
    RMD OPEN, 2021, 7 (03):