Impact of surgical aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve implantation on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular controls: A pilot study

被引:0
|
作者
Bari, Vlasta [1 ,2 ]
Gelpi, Francesca [1 ]
Cairo, Beatrice [1 ]
Anguissola, Martina [2 ]
Acerbi, Elena [3 ]
Squillace, Mattia [3 ]
De Maria, Beatrice [4 ]
Bertoldo, Enrico Giuseppe [5 ]
Fiolo, Valentina [5 ]
Callus, Edward [1 ,5 ]
De Vincentiis, Carlo [6 ]
Bedogni, Francesco [3 ]
Ranucci, Marco [2 ]
Porta, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Milan, Italy
[2] IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Dept Cardiothorac Vasc Anesthesia & Intens Care, Milan, Italy
[3] IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Dept Clin & Intervent Cardiol, Milan, Italy
[4] IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientif Maugeri, Milan, Italy
[5] IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Clin Psychol Serv, Milan, Italy
[6] IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Dept Cardiac Surg, Milan, Italy
来源
PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS | 2024年 / 12卷 / 17期
关键词
active standing; aortic valve stenosis; autonomic nervous system; baroreflex; blood flow; cerebral autoregulation; heart rate variability; mean arterial blood pressure; HEAD-UP TILT; SYMPATHETIC-NERVE ACTIVITY; CEREBRAL AUTOREGULATION; BAROREFLEX SENSITIVITY; RATE-VARIABILITY; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; PERIOD VARIABILITY; AUTONOMIC FUNCTION; BLOOD-PRESSURE; FLOW-VELOCITY;
D O I
10.14814/phy2.70028
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are options in severe aortic valve stenosis (AVS). Cardiovascular (CV) and cerebrovascular (CBV) control markers, derived from variability of heart period, systolic arterial pressure, mean cerebral blood velocity and mean arterial pressure, were acquired in 19 AVS patients (age: 76.8 +/- 3.1 yrs, eight males) scheduled for SAVR and in 19 AVS patients (age: 79.9 + 6.5 yrs, 11 males) scheduled for TAVI before (PRE) and after intervention (POST, <7 days). Left ventricular function was preserved in both groups. Patients were studied at supine resting (REST) and during active standing (STAND). We found that: (i) both SAVR and TAVI groups featured a weak pre-procedure CV control; (ii) TAVI ensured better CV control; (iii) cerebral autoregulation was working in PRE in both SAVR and TAVI groups; (iv) SAVR and TAVI had no impact on the CBV control; (v) regardless of group, CV and CBV control markers were not influenced by STAND in POST. Even though the post-procedure preservation of both CV and CBV controls in TAVI group might lead to privilege this procedure in patients at higher risk, the missing response to STAND suggests that this advantage could be insignificant.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Cardiac Repolarization After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Longitudinal Study
    Satoru Chino
    Eriko Yamanaka
    Toshifumi Takasusuki
    Shinsuke Hamaguchi
    Shigeki Yamaguchi
    Cardiology and Therapy, 2020, 9 : 97 - 105
  • [42] Hemodynamic consequences following surgical aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation - a randomized study
    Ryhammer, Pia Katarina
    Greisen, Jakob
    Jakobsen, Carl-Johan
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2015, 59 : 11 - 11
  • [43] Report on outcomes of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation and redo surgical aortic valve replacement in the Netherlands
    van Steenbergen, G. J.
    van Straten, B.
    Lam, K. Y.
    van Veghel, D.
    Dekker, L.
    Tonino, P. A.
    NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 30 (02) : 106 - 112
  • [44] Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus repeat surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with a failed aortic bioprosthesis
    Majmundar, Monil
    Doshi, Rajkumar
    Kumar, Ashish
    Johnston, Douglas
    Brockett, James
    Kanaa'N, Anmar
    Lahorra, Joseph A.
    Svensson, Lars G.
    Krishnaswamy, Amar
    Reed, Grant W.
    Puri, Rishi
    Kapadia, Samir R.
    Kalra, Ankur
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2022, 17 (15) : 1227 - +
  • [45] Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in the Era of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Jahangiri, Marjan
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 116 (04): : 767 - 767
  • [46] Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Octogenerians in the Era of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Yamauchi, Takashi
    Hiroshi, Takano
    Toda, Koichi
    Sawa, Yoshiki
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2018, 82 (06) : 1592 - 1597
  • [47] Similar clinical outcomes with transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement in octogenarians with aortic stenosis
    Kolar, Tadeja
    Lakic, Nikola
    Kotnik, Alesa
    Stubljar, David
    Fras, Zlatko
    Bunc, Matjaz
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [48] Will Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Echo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Durability?
    Little, Stephen H.
    Reardon, Michael J.
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 2 (11) : 1206 - 1207
  • [49] Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: a meta analysis
    Wu Yi-cheng
    Zhang Jian-feng
    Shen Wei-feng
    Zhao Qiang
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 126 (06) : 1171 - 1177
  • [50] Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Severe Aortic Stenosis
    Barbanti, Marco
    Ussia, Gian Paolo
    Capodanno, Davide
    Mignosa, Carmelo
    Cammalleri, Valeria
    Scarabelli, Marilena
    Aruta, Patrizia
    Pistritto, Anna Maria
    Imme, Sebastiano
    Gulino, Simona
    Bonura, Salvatore
    Cadoni, Alessandra
    Di Pasqua, Maria Concetta
    Bonanno, Claudio
    Gentile, Maurizio
    Cannata, Stefano
    Tamburino, Corrado
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 58 (20) : B38 - B38