Performance Comparisons of Association Rule Learning Algorithms on a Supermarket Data

被引:0
|
作者
Alawadh, Monerah Mohammed [1 ]
Barnawi, Ahmed Mohammed [1 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Association Rule Learning; Algorithm Comparison; Machine Learning; Apriori; pattern reconstruction; FP-Growth Algorithm; PATTERN;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-45642-8_49
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In today's business environment, sustaining growth and profitability is never a guarantee. This concept of instability encourages business owners to seek new opportunities using technological and scientific advances to grasp the sustainability and maximizing profit. Nowadays, Machine Learning is helping the retail sector in many ways. Such improved life cycles of products, services, and business models. Association Rule Learning (ARL) is an unsupervised machine learning technique having great potential to extract interesting and useful associations and/or correlations among frequent item sets in transactional dataset. ARL techniques are widely employed in a variety of applications, including web click data, medical diagnostics, consumer behavior analysis, bioinformatics, and many more. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive performance analysis of six distinct ARL algorithms, which was carried out to find the best fit algorithm for our data. The data is a large transactional dataset of one of the biggest supermarket chains in Saudi Arabia. Those algorithms are; Apriori, FP-Growth, GCD, Top-K Rules, TNR, and Closed AR. Note that these algorithms are uniquely different in terms of the number of datasets scanning which influences performance. The evaluation study shows that FP-growth algorithm based on FP-Tree outperformed other algorithms. FP-growth was more efficient and scalable than other algorithms for the given data in terms of memory usage and processing time.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 517
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Survey of Association Rule Hiding Algorithms
    Garg, Vikram
    Singh, Anju
    Singh, Divakar
    2014 FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES (CSNT), 2014, : 404 - 407
  • [22] Performance Analysis of Association Rule Mining Algorithms: Evidence from the Retailing Industry
    Mohanty B.
    Tripathy M.
    Champati S.
    Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 2023, 16 (05) : 108 - 122
  • [23] The hybrid of association rule algorithms and genetic algorithms for tree induction: an example of predicting the student course performance
    Hsu, PL
    Lai, R
    Chiu, CC
    Hsu, CI
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2003, 25 (01) : 51 - 62
  • [24] Performance Comparisons between Force-directed Algorithms on Structured Data Analysis
    Hua, Jie
    Huang, Mao Lin
    Wang, Guohua
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL REALITY AND VISUALIZATION (ICVRV 2017), 2017, : 166 - 167
  • [25] Comparisons between data clustering algorithms
    Abu Abbas, Osama
    INTERNATIONAL ARAB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 5 (03) : 320 - 325
  • [26] Performance comparisons for spectral unmixing algorithms
    Keshava, N
    IMAGING SPECTROMETRY VII, 2001, 4480 : 40 - 48
  • [27] A Comparison Between Rule Based and Association Rule Mining Algorithms
    Mazid, Mohammed M.
    Ali, A. B. M. Shawkat
    Tickle, Kevin S.
    NSS: 2009 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORK AND SYSTEM SECURITY, 2009, : 452 - 455
  • [28] Association rule learning in neuropsychological data analysis for Alzheimer's disease
    Happawana, Keith A.
    Diamond, Bruce J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 16 (01) : 116 - 130
  • [29] Realistic synthetic data for testing association rule mining algorithms for market basket databases
    Cooper, Colin
    Zito, Michele
    KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY IN DATABASES: PKDD 2007, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4702 : 398 - +
  • [30] Association rule mining - Models and algorithms - Introduction
    Zhang, CQ
    Zhang, SC
    ASSOCIATION RULE MINING: MODELS AND ALGORITHMS, 2002, 2307 : 1 - +