Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following degenerative spine surgery: a narrative review

被引:0
|
作者
Patel, Dhiraj [1 ]
Best, Shawn [1 ]
Ziino, Chason [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Robert Larner MD Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, 95 Carrigan Dr,Robert T Stafford Hall,4th Floor, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
来源
AME MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2024年 / 9卷
关键词
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT); pulmonary embolism (PE); chemoprophylaxis; hematoma; degenerative spinal surgery; DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS; MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN; VENA-CAVA FILTERS; LOW-DOSE HEPARIN; RISK-FACTORS; PULMONARY-EMBOLISM; CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS; CORD-INJURY; EPIDURAL HEMATOMA; TRAUMA PATIENTS;
D O I
10.21037/amj-23-149
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objective: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are feared thromboembolic complications following spinal surgery. Thromboembolism prophylaxis includes either mechanical prophylaxis or chemoprophylaxis with various pharmacological agents. Although mechanical prophylaxis is recommended by several evidence-based guidelines, chemoprophylaxis use remains controversial within the spine literature. Spinal surgeons face the difficult task of weighing the benefits of chemoprophylaxis against the risk of hemorrhagic complications. The aim of this critical review is to address the clinical consensus on the most appropriate thromboprophylaxis for degenerative spine surgery. Methods: A non-systematic search of the PubMed database was conducted in August 2023 utilizing the key words: [spine surgery], [thromboembolism], [prophylaxis]. Inclusion criteria included studies reporting on DVT or PE following degenerative spine surgery and those published in English, between the years 1980 and August 2023. Key Content and Findings: Upon review of the 200 resulting studies, we observed a broad range for venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence (0.2-43%). Although prior literature demonstrates that both mechanical and chemical anticoagulation are efficacious in reducing thromboembolic complications, chemoprophylaxis use remains widely contested across the studies analyzed in this review. Due to the variability in thromboembolism management preference, surgeons must maintain a high index of suspicion for post-operative thromboembolic complications. Conclusions: Based on safety and efficacy profiles uncovered through this review, it is our practice that all patients receive intermittent pneumatic compression throughout their hospital course and patients at high risk for thrombotic complications due to underlying hypercoagulability or poor mobilization are considered for chemoprophylaxis, in the form of low molecular-weight heparin as early as post-operative day one. Though compressive devices have been shown to be efficacious for thromboprophylaxis, there remains a lack of high-level evidence regarding the most appropriate form of chemoprophylaxis in spine surgery. Future investigations may aim to develop guidelines for chemical anticoagulation administration in degenerative spine surgery as well as a perioperative model to identify risk for VTE in patients that can be integrated into electronic health records.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Prophylaxis 24 to 36 Hours After Degenerative Spine Surgery Risk of Hemorrhage and Venous Thromboembolism
    Strom, Russell G.
    Frempong-Boadu, Anthony K.
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (23) : E1498 - E1502
  • [32] An Evidence-Based Algorithm for Determining Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Degenerative Spinal Surgery
    Shapiro, Joshua A.
    Stillwagon, Matthew R.
    Padovano, Alexander G.
    Moll, Stephan
    Lim, Moe R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 (04): : 599 - 606
  • [33] Chemical prophylaxis and venous thromboembolism following elective spinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rahmani, Roman
    Eaddy, Samuel
    Stegelmann, Samuel D.
    Skrobot, Gabriel
    Andreshak, Thomas
    NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2024, 17
  • [34] Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a systematic review
    Agarwal, Rajender
    Hecht, Todd E. H.
    Lazo, Myra C.
    Umscheid, Craig A.
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2010, 6 (02) : 213 - 220
  • [35] A systematic review of venous thromboembolism mechanical prophylaxis devices during surgery
    Herring, Brianna
    Lowen, Darren
    Ho, Prahlad
    Hodgson, Russell
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2023, 408 (01)
  • [36] The venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients receiving thoracic surgery: A systematic review
    Wang, Qin
    Ding, Jiefang
    Yang, Rusong
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 (05) : E142 - E152
  • [37] A systematic review of venous thromboembolism mechanical prophylaxis devices during surgery
    Brianna Herring
    Darren Lowen
    Prahlad Ho
    Russell Hodgson
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 408
  • [38] A review of completed audit cycles of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in ENT surgery
    Huang, W. H.
    Keane, E.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 186 : S99 - S99
  • [39] Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism following orthopedic surgery: Mechanical and pharmacological approaches and the need for extended prophylaxis
    Pineo, GF
    Hull, RD
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 1999, 82 (02) : 918 - 924
  • [40] Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in urology: A review
    Saluja, Manmeet
    Gilling, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (08) : 589 - 593