Lower Bounds for Learning in Revealing POMDPs

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Fan [1 ]
Wang, Huan [2 ]
Xiong, Caiming [2 ]
Mei, Song [3 ]
Bai, Yu [2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Salesforce AI Res, San Francisco, CA 94105 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper studies the fundamental limits of reinforcement learning (RL) in the challenging partially observable setting. While it is well-established that learning in Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) requires exponentially many samples in the worst case, a surge of recent work shows that polynomial sample complexities are achievable under the revealing condition-A natural condition that requires the observables to reveal some information about the unobserved latent states. However, the fundamental limits for learning in revealing POMDPs are much less understood, with existing lower bounds being rather preliminary and having substantial gaps from the current best upper bounds. We establish strong PAC and regret lower bounds for learning in revealing POMDPs. Our lower bounds scale polynomially in all relevant problem parameters in a multiplicative fashion, and achieve significantly smaller gaps against the current best upper bounds, providing a solid starting point for future studies. In particular, for multi-step revealing POMDPs, we show that (1) the latent state-space dependence is at least Omega(S-1.5) in the PAC sample complexity, which is notably harder than the (Theta) over tilde (S) scaling for fully-observable MDPs; (2) Any polynomial sublinear regret is at least Omega(T-2/3), suggesting its fundamental difference from the single-step case where (O) over tilde(root T) regret is achievable. Technically, our hard instance construction adapts techniques in distribution testing, which is new to the RL literature and may be of independent interest. We also complement our results with new sharp regret upper bounds for strongly B-stable PSRs, which include single-step revealing POMDPs as a special case.
引用
收藏
页数:58
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Minimax Lower Bounds on Dictionary Learning for Tensor Data
    Shakeri, Zahra
    Bajwa, Waheed U.
    Sarwate, Anand D.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2018, 64 (04) : 2706 - 2726
  • [32] Error Awareness by Lower and Upper Bounds in Ensemble Learning
    Liu, Yong
    Zhao, Qiangfu
    Pei, Yan
    2015 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NATURAL COMPUTATION (ICNC), 2015, : 14 - 18
  • [33] Upper and Lower Bounds on the Learning Curve for Gaussian Processes
    Christopher K.I. Williams
    Francesco Vivarelli
    Machine Learning, 2000, 40 : 77 - 102
  • [34] Superpolynomial lower bounds for decision tree learning and testing
    Koch, Caleb
    Strassle, Carmen
    Tan, Li-Yang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 ANNUAL ACM-SIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS, SODA, 2023, : 1962 - 1994
  • [35] Error Awareness by Lower and Upper Bounds in Ensemble Learning
    Liu, Yong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATTERN RECOGNITION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2016, 30 (09)
  • [36] Upper and lower bounds on the learning curve for Gaussian processes
    Williams, CKI
    Vivarelli, F
    MACHINE LEARNING, 2000, 40 (01) : 77 - 102
  • [37] Lower Bounds for Agnostic Learning via Approximate Rank
    Klivans, Adam R.
    Sherstov, Alexander A.
    COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY, 2010, 19 (04) : 581 - 604
  • [38] Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithms for Personalized Federated Learning
    Hanzely, Filip
    Hanzely, Slavomir
    Horvath, Samuel
    Richtarik, Peter
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 33, NEURIPS 2020, 2020, 33
  • [39] Quantum learning algorithms imply circuit lower bounds
    Arunachalam, Srinivasan
    Grilo, Alex B.
    Gur, Tom
    Oliveira, Igor C.
    Sundaram, Aarthi
    Proceedings - Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS, 2022, 2022-February : 562 - 573
  • [40] Reinforcement Learning in POMDPs Without Resets
    Even-Dar, Eyal
    Kakade, Sham M.
    Mansour, Yishay
    19TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IJCAI-05), 2005, : 690 - 695