Novel dosimetric validation of a commercial CT scanner based deep learning automated contour solution for prostate radiotherapy

被引:0
|
作者
Berenato, Salvatore [1 ]
Williams, Matthew [1 ]
Woodley, Owain [1 ]
Moehler, Christian [2 ]
Evans, Elin [3 ]
Millin, Anthony E. [1 ]
Wheeler, Philip A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Velindre Canc Ctr, Radiotherapy Phys Dept, Cardiff CF14 2TL, Wales
[2] Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany
[3] Velindre Canc Ctr, Med Directorate, Cardiff, Wales
关键词
AI; Automation; Prostate cancer; VMAT; IMRT; Delineation; Segmentation; CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103339
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: OAR delineation accuracy influences: (i) a patient's optimised dose distribution (PD), (ii) the reported doses (RD) presented at approval, which represent plan quality. This study utilised a novel dosimetric validation methodology, comprehensively evaluating a new CT-scanner-based AI contouring solution in terms of PD and RD within an automated planning workflow. Methods: 20 prostate patients were selected to evaluate AI contouring for rectum, bladder, and proximal femurs. Five planning 'pipelines' were considered; three using AI contours with differing levels of manual editing (nominally none (AI(Std)), minor editing in specific regions (AI(MinEd)), and fully corrected (AI(FullEd))). Remaining pipelines were manual delineations from two observers (MDOb1, MDOb2). Automated radiotherapy plans were generated for each pipeline. Geometric and dosimetric agreement of contour sets AI(Std), AI(MinEd), AI(FullEd) and MDOb2 were evaluated against the reference set MDOb1. Non-inferiority of AI pipelines was assessed, hypothesising that compared to MDOb1, absolute deviations in metrics for AI contouring were no greater than that from MDOb2. Results: Compared to MDOb1, organ delineation time was reduced by 24.9 min (96 %), 21.4 min (79 %) and 12.2 min (45 %) for AI(Std), AI(MinEd) and AI(FullEd) respectively. All pipelines exhibited generally good dosimetric agreement with MDOb1. For RD, median deviations were within +/- 1.8 cm(3), +/- 1.7 % and +/- 0.6 Gy for absolute volume, relative volume and mean dose metrics respectively. For PD, respective values were within +/- 0.4 cm(3), +/- 0.5 % and +/- 0.2 Gy. Statistically (p < 0.05), AI(MinEd) and AI(FullEd) were dosimetrically non-inferior to MDOb2. Conclusions: This novel dosimetric validation demonstrated that following targeted minor editing (AI(MinEd)), AI contours were dosimetrically non-inferior to manual delineations, reducing delineation time by 79 %.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multicenter evaluation of deep-learning based deliverable automated radiotherapy planning
    Yu, Lei
    Wang, Jiazhou
    Hu, Weigang
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 197 : S401 - S403
  • [42] An Independent Evaluation of a Deep Learning Research Tool for Autocontouring CT Images of Prostate Radiotherapy Patients
    Granville, D.
    Wilson, B.
    Sutherland, J.
    La Russa, D.
    MacPherson, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E206 - E206
  • [43] Comparison of Deep Learning synthetic CT methods for CBCT-guided adaptive prostate radiotherapy
    de Hond, Y.
    Kerckhaert, C.
    van Haaren, P.
    Tijssen, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S1383 - S1384
  • [44] Contour-guided deep learning based deformable image registration for dose monitoring during CBCT-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer
    Hemon, Cedric
    Rigaud, Bastien
    Barateau, Anais
    Tilquin, Florian
    Noblet, Vincent
    Sarrut, David
    Meyer, Philippe
    Bert, Julien
    De Crevoisier, Renaud
    Simon, Antoine
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (08):
  • [45] Cone-Beam CT to CT Image Translation Using a Transformer-Based Deep Learning Model for Prostate Cancer Adaptive Radiotherapy
    Koike, Yuhei
    Takegawa, Hideki
    Anetai, Yusuke
    Nakamura, Satoaki
    Yoshida, Ken
    Yoshida, Asami
    Yui, Midori
    Hirota, Kazuki
    Ueda, Kenichi
    Tanigawa, Noboru
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING INFORMATICS IN MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [46] What is the dosimetric Advantage of daily CT-based Imaging for Radiotherapy Position Monitoring in Patients with Prostate Cancer?
    Bostel, T.
    Splinter, M.
    Haering, P.
    Lang, C.
    Bougatf, N.
    Sachpazidis, I
    Baltas, D.
    Jaekel, O.
    Debus, J.
    Nicolay, N. H.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2019, 195 : S86 - S86
  • [47] Evaluation of the accuracy of automated segmentation based on deep learning for prostate cancer patients
    Miura, Hideharu
    Ishihara, Soichiro
    Kenjo, Masahiro
    Nakao, Minoru
    Ozawa, Shuichi
    Kagemoto, Masayuki
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2025, 50 (01) : 91 - 95
  • [48] deepPERFECT: Novel Deep Learning CT Synthesis Method for Expeditious Pancreatic Cancer Radiotherapy
    Hooshangnejad, Hamed
    Chen, Quan
    Feng, Xue
    Zhang, Rui
    Ding, Kai
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [49] A formal validation of a deep learning-based automated workflow for the interpretation of the echocardiogram
    Tromp, Jasper
    Bauer, David
    Claggett, Brian L.
    Frost, Matthew
    Iversen, Mathias Botcher
    Prasad, Narayana
    Petrie, Mark C.
    Larson, Martin G.
    Ezekowitz, Justin A.
    Solomon, Scott D.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [50] Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Based Automated Minirhizotron Image Analysis Pipeline
    Bauer, Felix Maximilian
    Laerm, Lena
    Morandage, Shehan
    Lobet, Guillaume
    Vanderborght, Jan
    Vereecken, Harry
    Schnepf, Andrea
    PLANT PHENOMICS, 2022, 2022