The EC50 of propofol with different doses of dexmedetomidine during gastrointestinal endoscopy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, Hong-Chun [1 ]
Ye, Qin [2 ]
Wu, Le [1 ]
An, Tian-Tian [1 ]
Wang, Fang-Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] North Sichuan Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Affiliated Hosp, Nanchong 637000, Peoples R China
[2] Zi Gong Fourth Peoples Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Zigong, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
dexmedetomidine; dose relationship; EC50; gastrointestinal endoscopy; optimal dose; propofol; TARGET-CONTROLLED INFUSION; SEDATION; COLONOSCOPY; SURGERY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000038421
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose:The goal of this study was to evaluate the dose-response relationship between dexmedetomidine and propofol in sedating patients and to determine the optimal dosage of dexmedetomidine during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods:One hundred fifty patients were divided into 5 groups, each receiving a loading dose of dexmedetomidine (0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 mu g/kg) or saline, with propofol for sedation. The median effective concentration (EC50) of propofol was calculated using the modified Dixon up-and-down approach. Adverse effects, vital signs, procedure, and recovery times were recorded. Results:The EC50 of propofol in groups NS, D0.4, D0.6, D0.8, and D1.0 were 3.02, 2.44, 1.97, 1.85, and 1.83 mu g/mL, respectively. Heart rate in the dexmedetomidine groups decreased more than the NS group (P < .001). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) in the NS group experienced a decline compared to groups D0.8 and D1.0 when the plasma concentration and effect-site concentration reached equilibrium. Additionally, the respiratory rate was found to be lower in groups NS, D0.4, D0.6, and D0.8 (P < .05). Recovery time in groups D0.8 and D1.0 was longer than the NS group (P < .05). Bruggemann comfort scales score was higher in group D1.0 (P < .05). No significant difference was found in the incidences of hypotension and bradycardia, and the dose of ephedrine and atropine. Respiratory depression was significantly reduced in groups D0.8 and D1.0 compared to the NS group. Conclusion:A single dose of 0.6 to 0.8 mu g/kg of dexmedetomidine should be recommended in combination with propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy. And the EC50 of propofol is 1.97 to 1.85 mu g/mL.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of modafinil for cocaine dependence
    Dackis, Charles A.
    Kampman, Kyle M.
    Lynch, Kevin G.
    Plebani, Jennifer G.
    Pettinati, Helen M.
    Sparkman, Thorne
    O'Brien, Charles P.
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2012, 43 (03) : 303 - 312
  • [42] A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of dextromethorphan for heroin detoxification
    Lin, S. -K.
    Pan, C. -H.
    Chen, C. -H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 11 : 245 - 245
  • [43] A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of risperidone in autistic disorder
    McDougle, C
    Aman, MG
    McCracken, JT
    Scahill, L
    Tierney, E
    Vitiello, B
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 13 : S327 - S328
  • [44] A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of nabumetone in the prophylaxis of migraine
    Diamond, S
    Freitag, FG
    Diamond, ML
    Urban, GJ
    Pepper, BJ
    HEADACHE QUARTERLY-CURRENT TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 1996, 7 (04): : 326 - 329
  • [45] DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF NAPROXEN FOR THE TREATMENT OF DYSMENORRHEA
    DAWOOD, MY
    RIMANDORAMOS, J
    SPANN, J
    NILAND, N
    HALLADAY, S
    FRANCISCO, C
    SKARE, K
    BARTIZEK, R
    SORRENTINO, J
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1995, 57 (02) : 166 - 166
  • [46] Marfan Sartan: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Milleron, Olivier
    Arnoult, Florence
    Ropers, Jacques
    Aegerter, Philippe
    Detaint, Delphine
    Delorme, Gabriel
    Attias, David
    Tubach, Florence
    Dupuis-Girod, Sophie
    Plauchu, Henry
    Barthelet, Martine
    Sassolas, Francois
    Pangaud, Nicolas
    Naudion, Sophie
    Thomas-Chabaneix, Julie
    Dulac, Yves
    Edouard, Thomas
    Wolf, Jean-Eric
    Faivre, Laurence
    Odent, Sylvie
    Basquin, Adeline
    Habib, Gilbert
    Collignon, Patrick
    Boileau, Catherine
    Jondeau, Guillaume
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (32) : 2160 - U37
  • [47] Gabapentin for Parkinsonism: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial
    Olson, WL
    Gruenthal, M
    Mueller, ME
    Olson, WH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 102 (01): : 60 - 66
  • [48] Olanzapine in Cocaine Dependence: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Hamilton, Joseph D.
    Nguyen, Quang X.
    Gerber, Robert M.
    Rubio, Nancy B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL ON ADDICTIONS, 2009, 18 (01): : 48 - 52
  • [49] A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Topiramate for Pathological Gambling
    Berlin, Heather A.
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 69 (09) : 37S - 37S
  • [50] A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of modafinil in cocaine dependence
    Dackis, CA
    Kampman, KM
    Lynch, KG
    Pettinati, HM
    Klein, LJ
    McAllister, MH
    Smith, KJ
    O'Brien, CP
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 29 : S72 - S73