Health-related quality of life after total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Song, Ke [1 ,2 ]
Qi, Liping [2 ]
Mu, Zongyou [2 ]
Sun, Houyi [1 ]
Zhai, Shenhao [2 ]
Liu, Dehua [1 ]
Li, Shihao [1 ]
Luo, Yange [1 ]
Liu, Peilai [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Dept Orthoped, Qilu Hosp, 07 West Wenhua Rd, Jinan 250012, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Qilu Hosp, Dezhou Hosp, Dezhou Peoples Hosp, Dezhou, Peoples R China
关键词
osteoarthritis; health-related quality of life; total knee arthroplasty; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY; FOLLOW-UP; MATCHED PATIENTS; REPLACEMENT; REVISION; OUTCOMES; ENGLAND; UNICONDYLAR; DISABILITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/10225536241256245
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundWhile previous research has demonstrated potential advantages of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) over total knee arthroplasty (TKA), particularly in terms of clinical outcomes such as function and pain relief, the specific impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to address this gap by comparing HRQOL outcomes between UKA and TKA, providing valuable insights for clinical decision-making.MethodsWe conducted a literature search in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases up to July 15, 2023. Eligible studies assessed HRQOL using EQ-5D, SF-36, or SF-12 and were assessed for methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).ResultsSeven eligible studies were included, comprising a total of 64,585 patients with 35,809 undergoing TKA and 28,776 undergoing UKA. Patient age ranged from 52.0 to 67.7 years with an average BMI ranging from 27.2 to 31.0 kg/m2. Follow-up periods ranged from 6 months to 10 years. Five studies (63,829 patients) that evaluated HRQOL using EQ-5D showed significantly better outcomes for UKA compared to TKA (MD -0.04, 95% CI -0.05 to -0.02). Two studies (756 patients) that evaluated HRQOL using SF-36 showed no significant difference between TKA and UKA. Five studies (63,286 patients) that evaluated functional outcomes using Oxford Knee Score (OKS) showed significantly better functional scores for UKA compared to TKA (MD -1.29, 95% CI -1.86 to -0.72). Four studies (24,570 patients) that reported patient satisfaction showed no statistically significant difference between TKA and UKA (MD 0.97, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.05). Further subgroup analysis did not affect the conclusions.ConclusionsOur meta-analysis suggests that UKA is associated with better HRQOL and knee function, as well as similar patient satisfaction, compared to TKA for patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of HRQL Between Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis
    Sweeney, Katie
    Grubisic, Maja
    Marra, Carlo A.
    Kendall, Richard
    Li, Linda C.
    Lynd, Larry D.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (09): : 187 - 190
  • [42] Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Migliorini, Filippo
    Bosco, Francesco
    Schaefer, Luise
    Cocconi, Federico
    Kaemmer, Daniel
    Bell, Andreas
    Vaish, Abhishek
    Koettnitz, Julian
    Eschweiler, Joerg
    Vaishya, Raju
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [43] Hip abductor muscle strength in patients receiving total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stocker, Roman
    Wittauer, Matthias
    Halbeisen, Florian
    Nuesch, Corina
    Kvarda, Peter
    Mundermann, Annegret
    Ismailidis, Petros
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2023, 153 : 86S - 86S
  • [44] Revision After Total Knee Arthroplasty and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in the Medicare Population
    Curtin, Brian
    Malkani, Arthur
    Lau, Edmund
    Kurtz, Steven
    Ong, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (08): : 1480 - 1486
  • [45] Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Jelle P. van der List
    Harshvardhan Chawla
    Leo Joskowicz
    Andrew D. Pearle
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2016, 24 : 3482 - 3495
  • [46] Cryotherapy Treatment After Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review
    Chughtai, Morad
    Sodhi, Nipun
    Jawad, Michael
    Newman, Jared M.
    Khlopas, Anton
    Bhave, Anil
    Mont, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (12): : 3822 - 3832
  • [47] Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    van der List, Jelle P.
    Chawla, Harshvardhan
    Joskowicz, Leo
    Pearle, Andrew D.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2016, 24 (11) : 3482 - 3495
  • [48] No Difference Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Medial Knee Osteoarthritis With or Without Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Du, Genfa
    Qiu, Hongtao
    Zhu, Jianzong
    Wang, Hongbo
    Xiao, Qinghua
    Zhang, Zhen
    Lin, Xiaosheng
    Zheng, Guangming
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (03): : 586 - +
  • [49] Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Lun
    Li, Juebei
    Wang, Yunlu
    Li, Xiyong
    Han, Pengfei
    Li, Xiaodong
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2024, 144 (09) : 4391 - 4403
  • [50] Patient satisfaction following robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hoveidaei, Amir Human
    Esmaeili, Sina
    Ghaseminejad-Raeini, Amirhossein
    Pirahesh, Seyed Kasra
    Hoveidaei, Armin
    Sandiford, Nemandra A.
    Lahner, Nina
    Citak, Mustafa
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2024, 32 (05) : 3625 - 3634