Assessing the Healthfulness of University Food Environments: A Systematic Review of Methods and Tools

被引:1
|
作者
Dahl, Alicia Anne [1 ]
Fandetti, Stacy M. [1 ]
Ademu, Lilian O. [2 ]
Harris, Ryan [3 ]
Racine, Elizabeth F. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Coll Hlth & Human Serv, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Inst Adv Hlth Agr, Texas A&M AgriLife Res Ctr El Paso, El Paso, TX 79927 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, J Murrey Atkins Lib, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Texas A&M AgriLife Res Ctr El Paso, El Paso, TX 79927 USA
关键词
food environment; food supply; food services; access to healthy foods; assessment; measurement; social ecological model; emerging adults; university students; VENDING MACHINES; NUTRITION INFORMATION; BEVERAGES SOLD; HEALTHY; CAMPUS; QUALITY; SNACKS; DIET;
D O I
10.3390/nu16101426
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
The availability, promotion, and price of healthy foods within the university food environment may impact students' dietary choices. This systematic review summarizes the tools and methods used to assess the healthfulness of university food environments where many students spend a significant portion of their emerging adulthood. Thirty-six global studies published between 2012 and 2022 were sourced from PubMed (NNLM), Cochrane Library (Wiley), Web of Science (Clarivate), APA PsycInfo (EBSCO), CINHAL Complete (EBSCO), ProQuest Nursing, and Allied Health, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Of the included studies, 58% were institutional-level audits, 17% examined individual-level perceptions, and 25% combined both. Most institutional-level audits focused on one aspect of the food environment (e.g., eateries, vending machines). For studies examining multiple spaces within the campus environment (38%), comprehensive assessments were limited, and most studies had to employ a combination of assessment tools. Surveys were most often used to gather individual perceptions about the food environment. The Nutrition Environment Measures Survey (NEMS) was the most commonly used tool across all studies. This review highlights the need for a standardized tool, method, or a "healthy" benchmark for specific use at universities to improve methodological rigor and comparability of findings across institutions.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A systematic review on university instructors' roles and competencies in online teaching environments
    Khodabandelou, Rouhollah
    Chaharbashloo, Hossein
    Ghaderi, Mostafa
    Zeinabadi, Hassanreza
    Karimi, Leila
    [J]. INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2022,
  • [42] Characteristics of built food environments associated with alternative protein food choices: a systematic review
    Zaleskiewicz, Hanna
    Kulis, Ewa
    Siwa, Maria
    Szczuka, Zofia
    Banik, Anna
    Grossi, Francesca
    Chrysochou, Polymeros
    Nystrand, Bjorn Tore
    Perrea, Toula
    Samoggia, Antonella
    Xhelili, Arlind
    Krystallis, Athanasios
    Luszczynska, Aleksandra
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2024, 21 (01)
  • [43] Exploring the influence of local food environments on food behaviours: a systematic review of qualitative literature
    Pitt, Erin
    Gallegos, Danielle
    Comans, Tracy
    Cameron, Cate
    Thornton, Lukar
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2017, 20 (13) : 2393 - 2405
  • [44] Food Compass is a nutrient profiling system using expanded characteristics for assessing healthfulness of foods
    Mozaffarian, Dariush
    El-Abbadi, Naglaa H.
    O'Hearn, Meghan
    Erndt-Marino, Josh
    Masters, William A.
    Jacques, Paul
    Shi, Peilin
    Blumberg, Jeffrey B.
    Micha, Renata
    [J]. NATURE FOOD, 2021, 2 (10): : 809 - 818
  • [45] Food Compass is a nutrient profiling system using expanded characteristics for assessing healthfulness of foods
    Dariush Mozaffarian
    Naglaa H. El-Abbadi
    Meghan O’Hearn
    Josh Erndt-Marino
    William A. Masters
    Paul Jacques
    Peilin Shi
    Jeffrey B. Blumberg
    Renata Micha
    [J]. Nature Food, 2021, 2 : 809 - 818
  • [46] Methods for Assessing the Preventability of Adverse Drug Events A Systematic Review
    Hakkarainen, Katja Marja
    Sundell, Karolina Andersson
    Petzold, Max
    Hagg, Staffan
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2012, 35 (02) : 105 - 126
  • [47] Methods for Assessing the Preventability of Adverse Drug EventsA Systematic Review
    Katja Marja Hakkarainen
    Karolina Andersson Sundell
    Max Petzold
    Staffan Hägg
    [J]. Drug Safety, 2012, 35 : 105 - 126
  • [48] Methods for Assessing the Preventability of Adverse Drug Events - A Systematic Review
    Hakkarainen, Katja M.
    Andersson, Karolina
    Petzold, Max
    Hagg, Staffan
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2010, 19 : S309 - S309
  • [49] Assessing the Cost of Healthy and Unhealthy Diets: A Systematic Review of Methods
    Cherie Russell
    Jillian Whelan
    Penelope Love
    [J]. Current Nutrition Reports, 2022, 11 : 600 - 617
  • [50] Assessing the Cost of Healthy and Unhealthy Diets: A Systematic Review of Methods
    Russell, Cherie
    Whelan, Jillian
    Love, Penelope
    [J]. CURRENT NUTRITION REPORTS, 2022, 11 (04) : 600 - 617