Patient engagement in a Canadian health research funding institute: implementation and impact

被引:0
|
作者
Richards, Dawn P. [1 ,2 ]
Twomey, Rosie [1 ]
Flynn, Trudy [1 ,3 ]
Hunter, Linda [1 ,4 ]
Lui, Eunice [1 ]
Stordy, Allan [1 ,5 ]
Thomas, Christine [1 ,4 ]
Khan, Karim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Canadian Inst Hlth Res Inst Musculoskeletal Hlth &, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Patient Partner, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Patient Partner, Halifax, NS, Canada
[4] Patient Partner, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Patient Partner, Calgary, AB, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 07期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Community-Based Participatory Research; Implementation Science; Patient Participation; Community Participation;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082502
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Patient engagement (PE) or involvement in research is when patient partners are integrated onto teams and initiatives (not participants in research). A number of health research funding organisations have PE frameworks or rubrics but we are unaware of them applying and reporting on their own internal PE efforts. We describe our work at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research's Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis (CIHR IMHA) to implement, evaluate and understand the impact of its internal PE strategy.Methods A co-production model was used involving patient partners, a PE specialist and staff from IMHA. A logic model was co-developed to guide implementing and evaluating IMHA's PE strategy. Some of evaluating the PE strategy and understanding its impact was a collaboration between the Public and Patient Engagement Collaborative (McMaster University) and IMHA.Results IMHA convened a PE Research Ambassador (PERA) group which co-led this work with the support of a PE specialist. In doing so, PERA had a number of meetings since 2020, set its own priorities and co-produced a number of outputs (video, publications, webinars, blog and modules called the How-to Guide for PE in Research). This work to evaluate and measure impacts of IMHA's PE strategy revealed positive results, for example, on PERA members, Institute Advisory Board members and staff, as well as beyond the institute based on uptake and use of the modules. Areas for improvement are mainly related to increasing the diversity of PERA and to improving accessibility of the PE outputs (more languages and formats).Conclusions Implementing a PE strategy within CIHR IMHA resulted in several PE activities and outputs with impacts within and beyond the institute. We provide templates and outputs related to this work that may inform the efforts of other health research funding organisations. We encourage health research funders to move beyond encouraging or requiring PE in funded projects to fully 'walk the talk' of PE by implementing and evaluating their own PE strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Interplay between Participatory Health Research and Implementation Research: Canadian Research Funding Perspectives
    Di Ruggiero, Erica
    Edwards, Nancy
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [2] Patient engagement in health implementation research: A logic model
    Bisson, Mathieu
    Aubrey-Bassler, Kris
    Chouinard, Maud-Christine
    Doucet, Shelley
    Ramsden, Vivian R.
    Dumont-Samson, Olivier
    Howse, Dana
    Lambert, Mireille
    Schwarz, Charlotte
    Luke, Alison
    Rabbitskin, Norma
    Gaudreau, Andre
    Porter, Jude
    Rubenstein, Donna
    Taylor, Jennifer
    Warren, Mike
    Hudon, Catherine
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2023, 26 (05) : 1854 - 1862
  • [3] Funding for Canadian health care research
    Orkin, Aaron M.
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2008, 178 (04) : 439 - 439
  • [4] IMPACT OF THE PRIVATE NONPROFIT SECTOR ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF CANADIAN HEALTH RESEARCH FUNDING
    OBRECHT, M
    DOUTRIAUX, J
    [J]. CANADIAN PUBLIC POLICY-ANALYSE DE POLITIQUES, 1992, 18 (03): : 290 - 299
  • [5] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH FUNDING AND RESEARCH IMPACT IN ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY
    Loftin, A. H.
    Stavrakis, A., I
    Patel, A.
    Burke, Z.
    Dworsky, E. M.
    Silva, M.
    Bernthal, N. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 63 (01) : 161 - 161
  • [6] The Association between Scholarly Impact and Canadian Institutes of Health Research Funding in Psychiatry
    MacMaster, Frank
    Swansburg, Rose
    Rittenbach, Katherine
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 81 (10) : S412 - S412
  • [7] Patient research partner engagement in OMERACT: Enhancing engagement through the implementation of patient engagement in research tools
    Hofstetter, Catherine
    Grosskleg, Shawna
    Hamilton, Clayon B.
    Hoens, Alison M.
    Shea, Beverley
    Tugwell, Peter
    Beaton, Dorcas
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2024, 67
  • [8] The goals of National Institute for Health Research funding for trainees
    Neilson, James P.
    [J]. LANCET, 2014, 383 : 5 - 6
  • [9] The new millennium in health research funding: Introducing Canadian Institutes of Health Research
    Atkinson, SA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2000, 31 (04): : 333 - 334
  • [10] The Impact of Patient and Family Engagement in Child Health Research: A Scoping Review
    Vanderhout, Shelley M.
    Bhalla, Manav
    Van, Alicia
    Fergusson, Dean A.
    Potter, Beth K.
    Karoly, Aliza
    Ly, Valentina
    Macarthur, Colin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2023, 253 : 115 - 128