Can Supercooled Phase Transitions Explain the Gravitational Wave Background Observed by Pulsar Timing Arrays?

被引:14
|
作者
Athron, Peter [1 ]
Fowlie, Andrew [2 ]
Lu, Chih-Ting [1 ]
Morris, Lachlan [3 ]
Wu, Lei [1 ]
Wu, Yongcheng [1 ]
Xu, Zhongxiu [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Normal Univ, Inst Theoret Phys, Dept Phys, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Sch Math & Phys, Dept Phys, Suzhou 215123, Peoples R China
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Phys & Astron, Melbourne, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
BUBBLE NUCLEATION; PERCOLATION; GROWTH; MODEL;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.221001
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Several pulsar timing array collaborations recently reported evidence of a stochastic gravitational wave background (SGWB) at nHz frequencies. While the SGWB could originate from the merger of supermassive black holes, it could be a signature of new physics near the 100 MeV scale. Supercooled first-order phase transitions (FOPTs) that end at the 100 MeV scale are intriguing explanations, because they could connect the nHz signal to new physics at the electroweak scale or beyond. Here, however, we provide a clear demonstration that it is not simple to create a nHz signal from a supercooled phase transition, due to two crucial issues that could rule out many proposed supercooled explanations and should be checked. As an example, we use a model based on nonlinearly realized electroweak symmetry that has been cited as evidence for a supercooled explanation. First, we show that a FOPT cannot complete for the required transition temperature of around 100 MeV. Such supercooling implies a period of vacuum domination that hinders bubble percolation and transition completion. Second, we show that even if completion is not required or if this constraint is evaded, the Universe typically reheats to the scale of any physics driving the FOPT. The hierarchy between the transition and reheating temperature makes it challenging to compute the spectrum of the SGWB.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Searching for a generic gravitational wave background via Bayesian nonparametric analysis with pulsar timing arrays
    Deng, Xihao
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2014, 90 (10):
  • [22] Accurate characterization of the stochastic gravitational-wave background with pulsar timing arrays by likelihood reweighting
    Hourihane, Sophie
    Meyers, Patrick
    Johnson, Aaron
    Chatziioannou, Katerina
    Vallisneri, Michele
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2023, 107 (08)
  • [23] Effect of small interpulsar distances in stochastic gravitational wave background searches with pulsar timing arrays
    Mingarelli, Chiara M. F.
    Sidery, Trevor
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2014, 90 (06):
  • [24] Stochastic gravitational wave background phenomenology in a pulsar timing array
    Bernardo, Reginald Christian
    Ng, Kin-Wang
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2023, 107 (04)
  • [25] Detecting the stochastic gravitational wave background using pulsar timing
    Jenet, FA
    Hobbs, GB
    Lee, KJ
    Manchester, RN
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 625 (02): : L123 - L126
  • [26] Axion curvaton model for the gravitational waves observed by pulsar timing arrays
    Inomata, Keisuke
    Kawasaki, Masahiro
    Mukaida, Kyohei
    Yanagida, Tsutomu T.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2024, 109 (04)
  • [27] Principles of Gravitational-Wave Detection with Pulsar Timing Arrays
    Maiorano, Michele
    De Paolis, Francesco
    Nucita, Achille A.
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2021, 13 (12):
  • [28] Geodesic noise and gravitational wave observations by pulsar timing arrays
    Golat, Sebastian
    Contaldi, Carlo R.
    PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2021, 818
  • [29] Charting the nanohertz gravitational wave sky with pulsar timing arrays
    Bernardo, Reginald Christian
    Ng, Kin-Wang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS D, 2025,
  • [30] Towards robust gravitational wave detection with pulsar timing arrays
    Cornish, Neil J.
    Sampson, Laura
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2016, 93 (10)