Life Cycle Assessment of an Avocado: Grown in South Africa-Enjoyed in Europe

被引:0
|
作者
Blaauw, Sheldon A. [1 ,2 ]
Broekman, Andre [2 ,3 ]
Maina, James W. [2 ]
Steyn, Wynand J. v. d. M. [2 ]
Haddad, William A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Arup, East West Bldg,1 Tollhouse Hill, Nottingham NG1 5AT, England
[2] Univ Pretoria, Dept Civil Engn, Private Bag X20, ZA-0028 Hatfield, South Africa
[3] Zutari, Riverwalk Off Pk,41 Matroosberg Rd,Ashlea Gardens, ZA-0081 Pretoria, South Africa
[4] ZZ2 Grp, Ecosyst Serv, POB 19, ZA-0825 Mooketsi, Limpopo, South Africa
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Agriculture; Carbon dioxide equivalent; Avocado farming; Climate change; EMISSIONS; CARBON;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-024-02009-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Food production is known to have significant environmental impacts, with the main contributors residing in the farming and transportation life cycle phases. Of the various food products transported around the world, avocados have increasingly gained attention as a high-commodity superfood. Avocados require specific climatic and agricultural conditions for farming, with the most fertile land and conditions located outside Europe. Consequently, most avocados consumed in Europe are imported over vast geographical distances, with little information available to quantify the environmental impacts of this imported superfood. This paper aims to present the most detailed life cycle assessment results of an avocado cultivated, grown and harvested in the Limpopo Province of South Africa and exported to the European market for sale and consumption. A life cycle assessment was developed for the farming, harvesting, handling, packaging, ripening, transportation, and carbon sequestration potential of the avocado, and it was used to conduct a holistic life cycle assessment. Input data was obtained through an 18-month data collection campaign across the relevant stakeholders. A baseline 'business-as-usual' scenario is focused on throughout this study, and scope for optimisation is identified for each life cycle phase where applicable, accompanied by uncertainty analyses. Results show a total carbon input of 904.85 kg CO2e/tonne. Mitigating this, 521.88 kg CO2e/tonne is offset, resulting in a net carbon footprint of 382.97 kg CO2e/tonne with uncertainty ranges of -23.22 to +58.69 kg CO2e/tonne, normalised to 57.45 g CO2e/avocado grown in South Africa and sold in Europe. The environmental impacts of the avocado industry under consideration are largely mitigated by the "nature first" philosophy of the farming and logistics enterprises, which have made significant investments in reducing emissions. Sensitivity analyses indicate that implementing large-scale renewable energy, using alternative packaging instead of cardboard, and selling avocados unripened could further enable the farming enterprise to achieve Net Zero objectives. These measures could reduce baseline emissions from 382.97 kg CO2e/tonne to a theoretical -68.54 kg CO2e/tonne, representing a 117.9% decrease. Although this study does not quantify climate change impacts, qualitative analyses suggest that climate change will have a net negative effect on the avocado industry in South Africa. These regions, typically located in micro-climates, are projected to become wetter and warmer, adversely affecting crop phenology, pest control, road conditions, management complexity, farmer livelihoods, and food security. The study recommends large-scale implementation of the optimisation strategies identified to achieve Net Zero objectives and the development of proactive climate change mitigation strategies to enhance the resilience of avocado supply chains to future stressors. These insights are crucial for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and consumers aiming to promote sustainability in the avocado market.
引用
收藏
页码:989 / 1005
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental life cycle assessment of water supply in South Africa: The Rosslyn industrial area as a case study
    Landu, Landu
    Brent, Alan C.
    WATER SA, 2006, 32 (02) : 249 - 256
  • [22] Erratum to: Life cycle assessment of chitosan production in India and Europe
    Ivan Muñoz
    Cristina Rodríguez
    Dominique Gillet
    Bruno M. Moerschbacher
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 1161 - 1162
  • [23] Life cycle assessment of selected future energy crops for Europe
    Rettenmaier, Nils
    Koeppen, Susanne
    Gaertner, Sven O.
    Reinhardt, Guido A.
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2010, 4 (06): : 620 - 636
  • [24] SETAC Europe Award for Lifetime Achievement in Life Cycle Assessment
    Joost Dewaele
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 1714 - 1714
  • [25] SETAC Europe Award for Lifetime Achievement in Life Cycle Assessment
    Dewaele, Joost
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (08): : 1714 - 1714
  • [26] In pursuit of environmentally friendly straws: a comparative life cycle assessment of five straw material options in South Africa
    Chitaka, Takunda Y.
    Russo, Valentina
    von Blottnitz, Harro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (09): : 1818 - 1832
  • [27] In pursuit of environmentally friendly straws: a comparative life cycle assessment of five straw material options in South Africa
    Takunda Y. Chitaka
    Valentina Russo
    Harro von Blottnitz
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2020, 25 : 1818 - 1832
  • [28] Environmental sustainability assessment of hydropower plant in Europe using life cycle assessment
    Mahmud, M. A. P.
    Huda, N.
    Farjana, S. H.
    Lang, C.
    2017 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RELIABILITY ENGINEERING (ICRE 2017), 2018, 351
  • [29] BIM-based life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of an office building in Western Europe
    Santos, Ruben
    Costa, Antonio Aguiar
    Silvestre, Jose D.
    Vandenbergh, Thomas
    Pyl, Lincy
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 169
  • [30] Social Life Cycle Inventory for Pavements – A Case Study of South Africa
    Blaauw S.A.
    Maina J.W.
    Grobler L.J.
    Transportation Engineering, 2021, 4