Efficacy and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with different frequencies on neuropathic orofacial pain: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Liao, Manxia [1 ,2 ]
Diao, Yingxiu [1 ,3 ]
Pan, Jiaxin [1 ,3 ]
Wong, Ling Shing [2 ]
Subramaniam, Geetha [2 ]
Vasanthi, Rajkumar Krishnan [2 ]
Liao, Linrong [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Med Univ, Dongguan Affiliated Hosp 1, Rehabil Med Ctr, Dongguan 523710, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] INTI Int Univ, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Nilai 71800, NS, Malaysia
[3] Gannan Med Univ, Sch Rehabil Med, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Med Univ, Sch Clin Med 2, Dept Rehabil Med, Dongguan 518100, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Dongguan Key Lab Intelligent Rehabil, Dongguan 523710, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Neuropathic orofacial pain; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; Rehabilitation; Meta-analysis; Neuromodulation; MOTOR CORTEX; DOUBLE-BLIND; RTMS; SLEEP; MULTICENTER; MECHANISMS; RELIEF; MODELS;
D O I
10.22514/jofph.2024.013
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive technique used to treat neuropathic orofacial pain (NOP). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rTMS in managing NOP and reducing health risks. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in various databases, including PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase and Clinical Trials.gov. Thirteen relevant articles were identified and assessed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was utilized to evaluate the evidence rating for the studies. The analysis of the thirteen randomized controlled trials, involving 355 eligible patients, demonstrated moderate evidence supporting the significant effect of rTMS in reducing pain intensity (Mean Difference (MD): -1.01, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) -2.39 to -1.48, p < 0.001) and improving the quality of life (QOL) based on various instruments (MD: -9.23, 95% CI -11.91 to -6.54, p < 0.001; MD: -2.1, 95% CI -3.74 to -0.45, p <0.05). Patients also reported favorable improvements in global impression (MD: -0.54, 95% CI -1.02 to -0.07, p < 0.05) and sensory status (Standardized Mean Difference (SMD): -1.30, 95% CI -1.74 to -0.87, p < 0.001). However, there were no significant improvements in sleep quality (MD: -1.72, 95% CI -4.13 to 0.68, p > 0.05) or psychological status (p> 0.05). Overall, the study demonstrated that rTMS is an effective and safe way to reduce pain, improve QOL, enhance sensory status, and create a positive clinical impression in patients with NOP. Further research is needed to investigate the effects of rTMS on sleep and psychological well-being in individuals with NOP.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 67
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on empathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, C. -C.
    Khalifa, N.
    Vollm, B.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 48 (05) : 737 - 750
  • [22] The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun, Nianyi
    He, Yu
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    Zou, Wenchen
    Liu, Xueyong
    [J]. SLEEP MEDICINE, 2021, 77 : 226 - 237
  • [23] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
    Sun, Pingping
    Fang, Lei
    Zhang, Jianzhong
    Liu, Yang
    Wang, Guodong
    Qi, Rui
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (03) : 499 - 514
  • [24] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Fibromyalgia: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Toh, Ezekiel Y. J.
    Ng, Jarret S. P.
    McIntyre, Roger S.
    Tran, Bach X.
    Ho, Roger C.
    Ho, Cyrus S. H.
    Tam, Wilson W. S.
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2022, 84 (04) : 400 - 409
  • [25] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yin, Lianjun
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    Chen, Lianghua
    Liu, Dandan
    Li, Haihong
    Liu, Zhaoxing
    Huang, Yong
    Chen, Junqi
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [26] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for pain after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gao, Feng
    Chu, Hongyu
    Li, Jianjun
    Yang, Mingliang
    Du, Liangjie
    Li, Jun
    Chen, Liang
    Yang, Degang
    Zhang, Hong
    Chan, Chetwyn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 61 (05) : 514 - 522
  • [27] Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Su, Yu-Chi
    Guo, Yao-Hong
    Hsieh, Pei-Chun
    Lin, Yu-Ching
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (20)
  • [28] The efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic orofacial pain: A systematic review
    Ferreira, Natalia R.
    Junqueira, Ygor N.
    Correa, Nathalia B.
    Fonseca, Estevao O.
    Brito, Nathalia B. M.
    Menezes, Thayna A.
    Magini, Marcio
    Fidalgo, Tatiana K. S.
    Ferreira, Daniele M. T. P.
    de Lima, Rodrigo L.
    Carvalho, Antonio C.
    DosSantos, Marcos F.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (08):
  • [29] Efficacy and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for generalised anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis
    Cui, Huiru
    Jiang, Lijuan
    Wei, Yanyan
    Li, Wei
    Li, Hui
    Zhu, Junjuan
    Pang, Jiaoyan
    Wang, Jijun
    Li, Chunbo
    [J]. GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 32 (05)
  • [30] Efficacy and safety of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in memory deficits in patients with Alzheimer's disease: Meta-analysis and systematic review
    Fernandes, Sara M.
    Mendes, Augusto J.
    Rodrigues, Pedro F. S.
    Conde, Ana
    Rocha, Magda
    Leite, Jorge
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 24 (02)